Secondary? Why?

1 pages Page 1
J
Judas Hawksriff
Frost Gate Guardian
#1
Quick question,

Are there any bonuses for not choosing a secondary class?

In the past most RPG games reward the player by being loyal to one profession, i.e, not having to split exp, level up quicker, etc

I was just wondering if anything along the same lines applied to GW? obviously you don't have to split your skill points, but is that it????
Spooky
Spooky
Bokusatsu Tenshi
#2
There is no advantage to single classing, only the disadvantage of being significantly less flexible. If you don't want to use a second profession, you don't have to allocate any points to it, but it doesn't hurt to have it - if for nothing else, then take Monk for a real Resurrect spell, none of this Res Signet business.
J
Judas Hawksriff
Frost Gate Guardian
#3
Blimey fast response, cheers for that, I'm a warrior atm toying with which secondary profession, if any, to go with. I was just wondering if it came down to a Warrior Vs Warrior/Ranger fight - purely on warrior skills, wether the single class would be better off, even if the other player didn't spend any skill points on the ranger?
f
funbun
Wilds Pathfinder
#4
All classes are balanced. It doesn't matter what you choose.

Get a secondary. Just GET one. Think of what your role in the group will be and build a character around that. I am a healing monk/support unit. So, I got Monk/Mesmser. I can heal my group plus cast anti-buff, energy drain type spells.

There is no down side to taking a secondary. You only get advantages. Skills and versatility is the name of the game.
Z
Zintinix Shoupthalus
Academy Page
#5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas Hawksriff
Blimey fast response, cheers for that, I'm a warrior atm toying with which secondary profession, if any, to go with. I was just wondering if it came down to a Warrior Vs Warrior/Ranger fight - purely on warrior skills, wether the single class would be better off, even if the other player didn't spend any skill points on the ranger?
On pure warrior skills I'd say ranger woudl win unless he coudln't use the pet he gets.
A
Auntie I
Wilds Pathfinder
#6
Just for your consideration: The game will not let you enter the Academy without a 2nd profession.
I have found that there is usually at least one skill in another profession that I want. You will see a lot of W/Mo just for the 1 or 2 healing spells that are available from the monk list.
J
Judas Hawksriff
Frost Gate Guardian
#7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auntie I
Just for your consideration: The game will not let you enter the Academy without a 2nd profession.
I have found that there is usually at least one skill in another profession that I want. You will see a lot of W/Mo just for the 1 or 2 healing spells that are available from the monk list.
No fair, and there was me thinkin' I had free will ?!?!
confessor24
confessor24
Ascalonian Squire
#8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auntie I
Just for your consideration: The game will not let you enter the Academy without a 2nd profession.
This is kind of a bummer if you ask me. Granted, I'm sure that almost everyone will go with two professions, but what of the people who like to play pure classes or perhaps just want more of a challenge? (Most Warriors will probably go with Monk b/c of the healing, but it would be a much bigger challenge to play a straight up Warrior, which traditionally has no healing abilties at all) It's kind of unfair to force players into choosing two.
J
Judas Hawksriff
Frost Gate Guardian
#9
Exactly, confessor24, spot on, as well as being a pure single class, it does mean the hard-core players can opt of another level of difficulty, your right, there should be at least the option so the player can choose whether they want another class or not, why don't we just make all the players hermaphrodites while we're at it, they're already all human!
A
Auntie I
Wilds Pathfinder
#10
Just because you have to have another class doesn't mean you have to use any of their skills or put any of your attribute points into the subclass attributes. You can play a "pure" class.
Romac
Romac
Lion's Arch Merchant
#11
silly silly silly

if you want to be a 'pure' warrior just take any second profession, then load your skillbar with just warrior skills.

why do people have to invent issues and problems???
J
Jesso
Academy Page
#12
Because there are people out there who are not "happy" unless they are upset. Make sense ?
A
Auntie I
Wilds Pathfinder
#13
As much as any other expanation I guess.
J
Judas Hawksriff
Frost Gate Guardian
#14
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auntie I
Just because you have to have another class doesn't mean you have to use any of their skills or put any of your attribute points into the subclass attributes. You can play a "pure" class.
Yeah, but you'd know you wern't really "pure"
A
Auntie I
Wilds Pathfinder
#15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Judas Hawksriff
Yeah, but you'd know you we're really "pure"
Huh! Is there a word or three missing from this sentence? It doesn't make any sense.
J
Judas Hawksriff
Frost Gate Guardian
#16
Sorry typo, meant to say "wern't"
A
Auntie I
Wilds Pathfinder
#17
Ahhhh! Now it makes sense.
f
funbun
Wilds Pathfinder
#18
Quote:
Originally Posted by confessor24
This is kind of a bummer if you ask me. Granted, I'm sure that almost everyone will go with two professions, but what of the people who like to play pure classes or perhaps just want more of a challenge? (Most Warriors will probably go with Monk b/c of the healing, but it would be a much bigger challenge to play a straight up Warrior, which traditionally has no healing abilties at all) It's kind of unfair to force players into choosing two.

Then don't use those spells. You are not obligated to you the secondary spell, nor do you have to give attribute point to your secondary. You hero can still be a All warrior is you want. Just dont' give and attribute point or use any secondary powers.

YOU DONT LOSE ANYTHING BY TAKING A SECONDARY
m
mqstout
Wilds Pathfinder
#19
It wasn't forced in the betas. I think they started to force it because a lot of people were complaining they'd get to post-searing with one job and be stuck that way. I'd be happy with the requirement of a second profession were dropped -- let the whiners whine if they go searing and can't go back to get a second because they ignore the bright red text that tells them it's a one-way trip. Punishment.
f
funbun
Wilds Pathfinder
#20
Either way someone isn't gonna be happy. Screw it, leave it. They're gonn piss off somone anyway