It is simple:
Rangers are probably the most hard to play class. Therefore, many fail to play them effectively. Therefore, this is one of the reasons they have a bad reputation.
E
|
Originally Posted by Charcoal Ann
also from a technical point of view rangers should not necesarily pull. that aggroes the mobs onto a character who spends much of their time near the casters. not too good. |
|
Originally Posted by ChoKILLate[FDG]
Why pull anymore....just send the warrior while everyone else stays out of agro. When they all attack, the ele can cast, the ranger can barrage, and the monk can balthazar's aura. Creatures dead in under 20sec!
The only time we ever pull now is when there are 3-4 groups that are on patrol in that particular area. If you pull make sure it is a small group because the ranger often runs back to the group and then everyone is is agro'ed. This is not always the ranger's fault, because often, the group does not back up far enough to give the ranger room to fall back. |
|
Originally Posted by wsmcasey
Unfortunately there's just no way to really tell if your getting a good or bad Ranger in a random pug until you start fighting (unless its a guildy or a friend). Allow me to dream for a moment: wouldn't it be nice if A-net incorportated a skill bar on a character for everyone else to see. Just like when your in a mission zone you can see the persons skill level and character combination (lvl20 E/MO), you would also see a skill bar ranging from 0-100% that would calculate numerous factors based on the person average performance in combat. That could be changed for healers as well on there performance to heal a party and so on.
|
|
Originally Posted by Shadowspawn X
There is no way to tell if anyone is any good regardless of class. The probelm is rangers are assumed to suck and everyone else is assumed to be good automatically.
|

|
Originally Posted by Eadwyn Mirwen
It is simple:
Rangers are probably the most hard to play class. Therefore, many fail to play them effectively. Therefore, this is one of the reasons they have a bad reputation. |
|
Originally Posted by ChoKILLate[FDG]
That's funny...the only class I assume sucks is the warrior. Too many first time users jump for the warrior class because they assumre that it is the strongest class. This is true early on, but changes as other classes gain the key skills that define them. From my many PUG quests I now assume that ~7 out of 10 warriors suck.
|
) but then they see me and are just awe'd.|
Originally Posted by pyrohex
The problem is, there are often as many retarded rangers out there as there are whammos - yes, a good ranger is worth his weight in gold, but they're about that rare as well. I am more than accomodating for mesmers and necros (though necros do seem to get retards occasionally), but I am often a little more hesitant with rangers. It's just...too hard to get a good one.
|