Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Yuan
LOL...you fail to understand people's posts when they attack you. Try to be the smart person you try to look like when you make these posts. If protective bond was "broken" Anet would have already fixed it.
These "attack" posts mean that you are just on a personal and emotional battle against what you believe is a problem. And frankly, just because you are crying and babbling about it doesnt make it a problem.
Concratz on your assumptions. Who said i soloed with a monk? Who said im rich? Try to not base your arguments on assumptions, rather base them on fact. If you have to invent stuff to actually be able to argue back, save urself the trouble and dont argue.
And why do you care if people are farming like hell??? Even if it was "broken", why do you care? Let them farm, let them "spoil" the game for themselves. Obviously this about something more than just wanting to FIX A BUG. Go play with your cool little groups you say you play and let the farmers do what they want. It's not like they are preventing you from having fun. You have your concept of "fun" and others may not share your same concept. Dont be a little kid who wants eveyone to agree with you. Go have your fun and let other people have their fun too. If you are so worried about it, as I said, there is something more about your ranting than just fixing a bug.
Just look at your first post. Sounds like a little kid who cant control his emotions. And before you answer the same crap you've been answering to everyone who doesnt agree with you, like "get to the topic", this post means protective bond is not broken. GET THAT THROUGH YOUR HEAD.
|
From the way you structured this post and how you reacted to it, it seems to me like the OP hit you right on the head with their post. Also you are more of the child, you bring up points that have been stated, you show no proof or evidence to dismiss why a skill is unborken, you just call it that and believe what you say. The world does not revolve around you.
The answers that were provided were all constructive and well placed, they were not rants that simply attacked people, as you have been doing. Perhaps the OP attacked you, but you were quite the arrogant sob in your first post, and perhaps it was a called reaction. Also about the assumptions... read your own original post you assumed far more than the OP did, so do shut up.
Spoiling transfers over to others, again the economy or the fact that the only monks left in the game (minus a few steadfast true monks) are kids who jumped on a bandwagon and started farming. Sure you can say what economy, but the actions of farming in that great of manner and in UW (of all places) will make fixing the economy even harder. So good job to you, you clearly care about the game.
Onto another note:
I have no problem with realistic farming, but the 105/55 is not realistic farming, it is children thinking they are gods. I got the pleasure of meeting such a jack ass in UW today, he said he was a healer monk, but to my displeasure he was another one of the 105/55 monks, he started showing off like some idiot, so what did we do? We let him have his fun, ignored him completly, let him ruin the first part of UW and constantly b*tch to go to smites, thankfully(and finally) someone dropped NR, and we lost a useless monk. If this isn't a serious problem do answer to me, what is then. These piece of crap "uber/broken" monks ruin UW for people who don't want to see some kid show off by tanking 5 aatxe and ruin any idea of challenge in the early goings.
As I stated I have no problem with realistic farming, go make a nice build and farm things, but why the heck do you need to be invicible on an obviously broken skill? I doubt that Anet intended it to be there, if you look at the math for Prot Bond the way it was written I doubt it was meant to go to 1 energy, but the only problem is to really change the math you would make the skill extremly expensive at start to keep it balanced at 17, I doubt anet invisioned people abusing this slight flaw in mathematics. The easiest fix would be to simply make a cap to energy cost, so instead of continuing the mathematical equation at 16-17 it should simply cap at an editable assymptote, this will solve the problems. (I was looking at the data via graphing)