Appologies if I sounded "snide"...I was only trying to point out that it might be an interesting challenge to play a pure ranger and that doing so does not neccessarily qualify one as an idiot (from the greek: idiotes; an ignorant person)...although, it might.
...Your point is well taken on the advantages of a dual class character. The secondary profession is an excellent way to add depth to a character...If, however, you choose to play a single class character, or make the error of joining the academy before acquiring a second profession, your character is NOT broken or unplayable. You may ascend as all other characters can, and make due with a pretty fair set of skills...it may be more difficult, sure, but challenge can be fun too.
I didn't mean to step on toes, just disagree (respectfuly, I thought) with the idea that the choice of no secondary is not viable...foolhardy for a new player...maybe even an error in judgement...but then, picking the wrong profession for your style of gameplay can be equally, if not more hazardous to character development. Thinking that a Monk/Warrior will be the ultimate tank with smiting skills, is an error I'm sure someone will make...but, live and learn. We all need to consider how we want to play based on our own skills and preferences...
I hope in disagreeing with a statement that I thought a bit harsh won't incure wrath or flame or mod intervention...just an opinion after all. I thought I put up a well-formed argument. No intent to provoke or sound snide...Maybe it's because I'm a teacher...some of my students, I'm sure, read arrogance into things where it wasn't intended...
I get Weezer_Blue's point, but think it's a bit overstated...I might say it like: ...going with ONLY Ranger and not getting a secondary class is not a great idea unless you want to cut your potential skill set in half. The character becomes somewhat limited until level 20, where you have another chance to pick up the secondary profession.
In the case of a Ranger with or without a secondary, I load up on skills points in this order: Marksmanship, Expertise, Wilderness Survival...with the secondary class of monk, I put in a couple of leftover points in Healing Prayers, with no secondary, I put them in Beast Mastery. All Rangers, in my humble opinion, should focus first and foremost on Marksmanship and Expertise...the rest will fall into place as you refine your playing style. There are some great Ranger builds listed in this forum, and I would reccomend giving most of them a shot...skills are mix-and-matchable beyond what most of us are used to, so there's plenty of room for experimentation...
I've gotta say it...in spite of all the reccomendations against it...I STILL plan on running a Ranger focused on Beast Mastery, just to see how sucessful it can be...I don't play PvP much, but I'd be interested in seeing how I could hold up just the same...Ultimately, it's easy to love the folly of the foolhardy and I intend to play the fool...after all, my guild is The Rook and Jester.
