Title says it all, I really don't see what the point of going around capping skills with just 1 character is.
You should cap warrior skills with your warrior, not with your mesmer! I don't see how any mesmer could ever use..say dwarven battle stance or bull charge.
So if any one else agrees with me sign this thread!
Good luck..
Make The skill hunter title account based!
1 pages • Page 1
fenix
Major-General Awesome
Ex Talionis [Law], Trinity of the Ascended [ToA] ????????????????&#
W/
Joined Aug 2005
T
T
T
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DFrost
There could be another title for having all skills unlocked (elites and normal ones), which might work as account-based.
|
T
Not signed sorry
I'm going for skill hunter with my warrior and pretty much have all the warriors elites. I just swap my secondary around and cap whatever else I can! Most skills are pretty useless but it's a challenge for me to go and get them with a secondary prof that has no use to me. Leave it as it is and like the one of the above posters points out all titles are pretty useless anyway
I'm going for skill hunter with my warrior and pretty much have all the warriors elites. I just swap my secondary around and cap whatever else I can! Most skills are pretty useless but it's a challenge for me to go and get them with a secondary prof that has no use to me. Leave it as it is and like the one of the above posters points out all titles are pretty useless anyway
P
/signed - it's stupid having to spend time/gold to cap elite skills on a character that won't or can't use them - you personnally have capped the elite and shouldn't matter on which character you did it, titles should be earned by the account holder not individual characters.
Although it'll never change - ANET like us having to do the exact same repetative tasks multiple times as it makes it seem as if there is more to do in the game than there really is - and what makes it worse is that the bosses you want don't always spawn (took me 4 clearances of perdition rock before I finally got the ranger elite i was after).
Although it'll never change - ANET like us having to do the exact same repetative tasks multiple times as it makes it seem as if there is more to do in the game than there really is - and what makes it worse is that the bosses you want don't always spawn (took me 4 clearances of perdition rock before I finally got the ranger elite i was after).
I got to 135, but after I got all the primary and all the elites from a few secondaries and then some no attribute and what not skills I might use later I quit at 135. I mean what's the point to getting the primary attribute elites if you'll probably never use them? The only fun exception I can think of is Unyielding Aura or if you just plain don't have them unlocked with faction. It is useless but you have the choice, and gladly it doesn't max out at 180 so you aren't going for it for KOABD... at least we don't know yet.
/signed.
All of the other titles are given for things that characters would do anyways. Getting all the bonuses? Exploring all of the map? ID'ing alot of golds? All things that characters were doing before titles even existed. But why should my warrior cap an elite based off of another classes primary attribute, like Ether Renewal or something, when its impossible for my warrior to ever use it? The title should be account based, so should wisdom, treasure hunting, cartographer, and drunkard.
All of the other titles are given for things that characters would do anyways. Getting all the bonuses? Exploring all of the map? ID'ing alot of golds? All things that characters were doing before titles even existed. But why should my warrior cap an elite based off of another classes primary attribute, like Ether Renewal or something, when its impossible for my warrior to ever use it? The title should be account based, so should wisdom, treasure hunting, cartographer, and drunkard.


