Is 22 avg FPS normal with a Nvidia Geforce 6800? Not unlocked, ill unlock the pipes soon to see if a difference occurs.
I once used the windows driver verifier to stop it from BSODing, dont know if that did the trick to make it slow.
Im running everything on high except for shadows (med) and 4x aa
3400+ AMD
1 GB ram
Win XP
22 Avg FPS with a Nvidia Geforce 6800
1 pages • Page 1
s
j
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ElRey
Is 22 avg FPS normal with a Nvidia Geforce 6800? Not unlocked, ill unlock the pipes soon to see if a difference occurs.
I once used the windows driver verifier to stop it from BSODing, dont know if that did the trick to make it slow. Im running everything on high except for shadows (med) and 4x aa 3400+ AMD 1 GB ram Win XP |
What version of Direct X 9c? (there was a june release)
Latest Drivers? (Version 91.31 is the latest)
Are you running anything in the background?
What resolution are you playing the game at?
s
I have a Geforce 6800 too, and although im not getting 22fps (i get around 60-80 on average) I also used to have BSOD problems too at least once a day untill i upgraded to the 91.31 drivers recently.
What still bothers me is how the fps can plunder from a smooth 85 to 10 no matter what graphics settings i have. One thing i have noticed is on all the GWforum tech help forums i see "poor performance" threads posted along with the poster owning a "Geforce 6800".
The rest of my specs :
Geforce 6800 128mb
2ghz AMD Athlon 64 3000+
DFI Lanparty Motherboard
1GB Ram
120GB HDD
Latest Nvidia drivers 91.31
Latest Dx9c
Windows XP SP2
What still bothers me is how the fps can plunder from a smooth 85 to 10 no matter what graphics settings i have. One thing i have noticed is on all the GWforum tech help forums i see "poor performance" threads posted along with the poster owning a "Geforce 6800".
The rest of my specs :
Geforce 6800 128mb
2ghz AMD Athlon 64 3000+
DFI Lanparty Motherboard
1GB Ram
120GB HDD
Latest Nvidia drivers 91.31
Latest Dx9c
Windows XP SP2
No matter if i turn AA off, move my settings to lowest, I still get the same FPS as if I had them turned up to their highest setting.
Ill try the no sound advice.
A bit of a prominent Fact - I was playing this game around 6 months ago at the highest settings with the same computer and it was running at a smooth 60 FPS always.
I also believe I am running this at the 91.31 drivers and at 1280x1024.
Ah and yes I am using some odd C-Media Integrated Sound device i believe, but I am not using a Sound card, so My best guess is that it is integrated :P
Ill try the no sound advice.
A bit of a prominent Fact - I was playing this game around 6 months ago at the highest settings with the same computer and it was running at a smooth 60 FPS always.
I also believe I am running this at the 91.31 drivers and at 1280x1024.
Ah and yes I am using some odd C-Media Integrated Sound device i believe, but I am not using a Sound card, so My best guess is that it is integrated :P
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Helll is for Heroes
its probably graphics card related, do you have integrated sound?
|
http://forums.gwonline.net/showthread.php?t=392189
It "most" probably is sound related
s
X
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ryld Baenre
-nosound should fix yout problem. I was having the same difficulties and once I used -nosound everything went away and I have no more performance issues.
|
I have almost the same setup. I also have a sound card instead of integrated sound which is probably why my system wasn't hit as bad with performance issues in GW. I still get certain spots where the FPS will drop to 7(maybe a badly designed area) but its normally a smooth high frame rate.
ive been running winamp with ff7 ost for like ever ? Ever since that sound update..
I rather listen to winamp then to lag in game with guildwar's music.
Btw, any1 not lagging at all ?
Mind telling us what directx version you're using.
I'm using the june revision. And yea, the lag is still evident.
I rather listen to winamp then to lag in game with guildwar's music.
Btw, any1 not lagging at all ?
Mind telling us what directx version you're using.
I'm using the june revision. And yea, the lag is still evident.
