OMG! Cap ANY PVE creature as your pet! [petition]...

This is a long shot probably but:

Cap ANY PVE creature / monster as the look of your pet! Of course the sizes of some creatures will need to be adjusted. Anyone else like? Wouldn't it be cool have to have a pet kirin, ettin, vampire, etc?

(Edited by a moderator for emphasis)

OMG, unbalanced.

please don't sign this.

Um...
Temple Guardians?
no thanks.
/unsign

How would it be unbalanced if pets were still not allowed to have any skills, and it was only skins?

Imagine some one getting ran to droks capping a troll and pwning in ascalon arena...

hmm... I think i'll go cap Shiro as my pet. He's technically a creature. Or maybe the lich?

/unsign

Is everyone completely illiterate? Re-read my suggestion. It would obviously have to have no skills, and have an appropriate amount of hp and armor according to what level it was, and if you capped one over level 20, it would drop to be level 20. Not saying it's a good idea, just use a bit of common sense.

I don't really see how rangers would be able to have some kind of mind control over every living (and undead?) being there is. Befriending the animals, like it is now, seems more suitable.

"I'm using Charm Animale on The Undead Lich"

NO

Pokeball go!

/undecided

I like it, but only on creatures, not humanoids (trolls, ettins, tengu, dwarves, etc). Undead is ok, if it's a creature (a bone dog, or one of those little nibbler guys).

/unsigned

Just the sheer amount of craziness it would cause for everyone to have the coolest looking pet, no skills or anything even. But they would have to go back and change a heck load of code too, and I dont know about you but i don't wanna go through that load

Everyone, I've bolded the critical word here.

This isn't a suggestion to actually command an Undead Lich. It's merely a suggestion to have ultimate power over the skin of your pet, essentially. At least, that's how I read it.

And with that in mind, I'm kind of half and half. It's an interesting suggestion, definitely, and could have some hilarious results if implemented, but something seems odd...not sure what that is, though. =/

/undecided

/notsigned
I can see the griefing now. A ranger with not pet goes into Hell's Precipice with a group to do the mission. They get to the lich and the ranger casts charm animal on lich and then maps out. Mission failed (because you couldn't technicially kill the lich).

It would be kinda cool (I can just see IWAY with all White Mantle Zealots as pets *shutter*), but pretty ridiculous. Plus it would create a whole bunch of stuff like that. Worried about the mursatt monk THK boss? Just bring a ranger with no pet and charm animal to take it out.

Also, it would change the way EoE worked. EoE clumps all pets as being the same type of creature. That would get pretty confusing/wierd if your pet wasn't affected for killing a PvE creature with the exact same skin by EoE.

Sage Wurm? :S:S:S:S

/unsigned

ummm lol?

/unsigned

lol.

Firstly he did say creature I believe, Mursaat, White Mantle, Shiro, Rurik, Undead, and presumably Dwarves don't count.

/unsigned

Because honestly I don't like the idea.

/unsign would be waaaay to much work for aranet and i want to play GW nightfall somewhere in 2007 not 2010

gne... I want Maw
anyhow i think i'd be a bit over the top

Trolls small as mini turtles,
Tundra GIANTS small as stalkers.
Wurms small like black widow.
That would look wierdo.
Tiny tiny minotour, so cute so small
You make me want to get a grawl
Idea so bad
This makes me sad..

no no no no no Not signed.. (Think before you post these ideas. Think of all the work)