Quote:
Originally Posted by wilebill
The devs are doing fine. I also play another game that charges a monthly fee and it still has bugs (like whole rain forests full of bugs) with every major patch. Bugs happen. Live with it.
ANet has been, and is, very responsive to reasonable player input. The key word here is "reasonable."
|
Comparing one company with bad performance to another one with even worse performance is NOT that productive, don't you think?
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkofStorms
Clearly, the majority of these armchair quarterbacks have never done work as a programmer.
Or in an office setting of any kind.
I'm sure a company cares about its product. If they didn't, they'd all be out of a job. They care more about their game then any of you. If it fails, that means they have no money to provide for their families. What's the worst that will happen to YOU if GW suddenly collapses?
|
Caring about the game they created and keep it in good shape is 2 different stories.
You think NCSoft didn't care about Tabula Rasa? Of course they did. And look what happened.
Same goes for all other failed games out there. Should I mention Fury? Nah, that'd be hurtful for some people here.
I don't think you need to have any programming experience to do simple comparison. Other companies can do their jobs with good performance, why can't Anet? Oh, because we don't pay them monthly-fee? So basically this so-called "next-gen" business model is resulted in games that are just CHEAP?
Thanks, good to know.