Hero's In HA

Hello,
My game change reflects on Hero's Ascent and the abilty to bring hero's into a PvP enviroment. Hero's should be removed from Hero's Ascent it's PvP battle which means no AI should be used here Arenanet Fixed Part of the problem when they lowered the number of allowable hero's to two. Kudo's to anet for fixing that but that is only part of the problem they should have removed the abilty to use Hero's in PvP compeletly or so they can only be added in Hero Battle's where there suppose to be. Please Anet find it in ur heart to fix the game.

/signed

PvP shouldn't have heroes aside from HvH.

Teasesmite isn't fun.

The AI is only better at interupting (not choosing what but pulling it off quick). For this reason alone.

/signed

/signed
HA is no place for AI

I don't think there's a need to remove them from HA entirely. The biggest problem is not with the smiters, it's not with tease, it's with weapon of warding/weapon of shadow. As soon as a person with an axe/sword/scythe/etc targets someone and gets within range, they have weapon on them before the player can even reach the target. This is a big problem.

While ur not lying the weapon spells as soon as you look at a person is quite annoying. I disagree with you saying tease isn't a problem. It is a huge problem there has been times when i have been rc monk and got teased on rof and there has been times i was on a warrior and get teased on my attack skills.

Heros are meant to be used for hero battles not heros ascent.

/signed

Remove heros from pvp (HA and GVG).

Tease / Smite heroes are kinda annoying but not wowzers broken. The problem atm is the c-space cowboys that bring them and can still kill with a 2 monk backline, tease hero, smite hero and earth ele. Palm Strike is the big problem and if you take heroes out of HA it will only mean less activity. Not saying I <3 heroways of any kind but yeah...

/notsigned

The problem with not having heros is too many groups run away teams. Example, spike teams. I agree that having heros removed from HA while I think groups should have more elaborate builds then a total spike build.

OOOOOOOOOOO, the good ol days of GW, when people once played the game.

Would there be anyone left after removing heroes?

I agree that HA has problems and needs fixing. I haven't played there enough to be able to tell whether removing heroes would be too effective.

This is a good idea.

/signed.

/notsigned, Will just cause more HA inactivity.

for a more in-depth discussion and bashing of heroes in HA, please refer to my thread in the HA channel...

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10345417

but I do agree with this thread

slashagree heroes no belong in high end PvP just as henchman dont belong in UW/FoW

/not signed

heroes are not a problem in HA, I make groups like heroway, but with human players, works just as effective, so removing heroes would not really change or alter any of the problems you seem to be having in HA.
But the more you come up against the teams the easier they are to beat. if the players use heroes right than i agree that they are overpowered, but not many people do, so the ones that do do it properly deserve the rewards that come with it.

Bypassing the human element of PvP is pretty stupid.

Loads of people quited HAing because of these heroes.
Nobody wants his/her RoF interupted by a hero every time.

The little mistakes a person can make, makes it more exciting.

Besides. Using Super interrupt bots isnt really fair.

/signed, but it won't happen anyway.

Let's just wait for this week's 'BALANCE'. I sense some nice nerfs and buffs.

Its called "Hero's" Accent, its for Hero's. Ok jkjks but imo /notsigned, easier to get groups, HA is already dead almost every match seems to be /hallsskip.

/notsigned

ppl dnt HA enuff for us to remove heroes.

The waits on battles would be 2 long with all the hero teams