Just Wondering if you'd prefere one of the following options
1.GW2 Delayed by a month, Some GW1 Bugs fixed+ possibilty of new things
2.GW2 Delayed by 3 months, New expansion/ Standalone released
3.GW2 released ontime
jsut a tought.
unsure about how long dev. would take so i put in roughly some time.
GW2 Delayed for new things?
3 pages • Page 1
T
i want 3...
maybe the community will fix its self and the Xmas '05 bunch will emerge again... and i'm so excited for finding a group in under 2 minutes for a mish by yelling "Healer LFG!"
...but with the way things are going, community wise... along with the cool and nice bunch from Xmas '05, the 11 year olds will be free from their cages aswell
maybe the community will fix its self and the Xmas '05 bunch will emerge again... and i'm so excited for finding a group in under 2 minutes for a mish by yelling "Healer LFG!"
...but with the way things are going, community wise... along with the cool and nice bunch from Xmas '05, the 11 year olds will be free from their cages aswell
N
A
I say 2.
But more like GW2 delayed by 3 months and mini-expansion ($20) for GW1 released.
Or GW2 delayed by 6 months and expansion ($40) for GW1 released.
3 months is too short to put together an expansion.
They seem to have some art and who knows what else laying around that they didn't use in GWEN. It would be a quick way for Anet to make a buck and keep GW1 more active.
But more like GW2 delayed by 3 months and mini-expansion ($20) for GW1 released.
Or GW2 delayed by 6 months and expansion ($40) for GW1 released.
3 months is too short to put together an expansion.
They seem to have some art and who knows what else laying around that they didn't use in GWEN. It would be a quick way for Anet to make a buck and keep GW1 more active.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VitisVinifera
4. Who the f cares, it's years away
|
There is alot about GW2 in this forum adn complaints about GW1, jsut seeing would people like to see some bugs fixed but at the expense of gw2 release or not or maybe an addition to GW1.
More content over the next few years of wait would be nice, but not necessary. Personally, I'd like pretty much exclusive PvP focus while we wait, there's plenty of stuff to do in PvE.
As for the release date of GW2, it'd be nice if they released on the deadline. However I'd prefer if the game is released when it's done. Forcing a deadline can lead to a buggy, half working game. Possibly even a half finished game with the original content to be added in later. As was the case with Nightfall.
As for the release date of GW2, it'd be nice if they released on the deadline. However I'd prefer if the game is released when it's done. Forcing a deadline can lead to a buggy, half working game. Possibly even a half finished game with the original content to be added in later. As was the case with Nightfall.
I would prefer to see GW2 delayed another year or even longer if that is what it takes to release a game that ANet will be proud of.
Blizzard does have a great policy on game releases. They will not release anything that does not meet their high standard of excellence. As with StarCraft 2, they will only say "It will be released when it is ready." I think ANet feels the same way.
Zinger, not my impression; but what is your source?
Blizzard does have a great policy on game releases. They will not release anything that does not meet their high standard of excellence. As with StarCraft 2, they will only say "It will be released when it is ready." I think ANet feels the same way.
Zinger, not my impression; but what is your source?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wilebill
I would prefer to see GW2 delayed another year or even longer if that is what it takes to release a game that ANet will be proud of.
Blizzard does have a great policy on game releases. They will not release anything that does not meet their high standard of excellence. As with StarCraft 2, they will only say "It will be released when it is ready." I think ANet feels the same way. Zinger, not my impression; but what is your source? |
M

