Canthan Grandmaster Cartographer in a day - What's A-Net going to do about it?
15 pages • Page 14
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mineria
But did you think a bit about the HoM issue concerning it?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Saraphim
I do, in fact the 'Mapping Out' tool from this very forum is a joy to use. I can find out in seconds which characters need which elites, and the info is saved for me for future reference. I used to use an excel sheet to record elites before, Mapping Out is a godsend IMO.
Only have Canthan hunter so far, as I need more cash before I do the other two. |

To be truthful, both TexMod and Mapping Out are godsends, and since they run independently, they are both great assets to the community. This thread really is all about e-peen.
e
Quote:
| PS - I used photoshop after i reached 99.8%........ so i guess i cheated to. lol |
Quote:
| To be truthful, both TexMod and Mapping Out are godsends, and since they run independently, they are both great assets to the community. This thread really is all about e-peen. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by nbajammer
Pray tell, Gaile, exactly what is changed by TexMod? It does not modify any in-game files, so how exactly is anyone other than the user incovenienced by this program? And if a person decides to inconvenience themselves, well they'd have only themselves to blame wouldn't they?
Furthermore, if the program actually was a cheat, then explain to me this. Why, then, is there an entire page devote to it, on the OFFICIAL Wiki, with comments from Emily stating that it is okay to use but not to contact support if it breaks our game because they will not support it? To anyone reading that page, it looks like it is in fact PERMITTED by Anet to use. The OP just wants a bigger e-peen for achieving something without aids that many people used. All of them should not be punished for using a permitted program to achieve a title that only affects them and not other users, and does not change the game client in any way, shape, or form. Nor the server, either. The page in question is here: http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Texmod As others in the thread have stated, Anet has more important matters to focus on than one poster's QQ about worked harder for a title than others. Please do us all a favor and take that out of the summary. There's NO problem here, and we'd rather see time devoted to better and more useful things than this. |
Nuff said in this post. Please close.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torqual
When you read pages of ignorant people saying "QQ more" to your long and thought out post, it kind of makes you lose interest in continuing to post constructively yourself. I accept my error.
The discussion has most definitely run its course. |
T
My whole point was that use of the mod is widespread - check the OP.
Three types of people have posted in here:
1) Those who did the title without modifying their game client, who are also disappointed that it's been cheapened and can be achieved with 5% of the original effort needed when it was implemented into the game.
2) Those who used the mod to get their own title and take offence to me saying they got it on the cheap. Plenty of these. They are as offended by my comments as I am by their use of it to steal the title.
3) People that have little interest in the subject or knowledge about it who make a habit of entering random threads and trying to look cool by making throw away comments and putting people down.
I am quite sure that this discussion has drawn the attention to use of the mod and may even increase usage. But come on, there's a link to it on the official GW Wiki! It's well known and as I said in my OP, LGMC is the third-most maxed title you see popping up in Kamadan ... and it's evident why.
Can I also clarify that this is not an attack on the modding community. I have enjoyed some great mods in many games: RTW, CS: Source, even Kick Off 2 (bet no-one here knows what that is).
This is a very, very smart mod, a really fine piece of programming. And I would suggest that use of this mod to put someone on 99.7% out of their misery is quite a reasonable and understandable thing. I am not a grind Nazi. But using the mod to take yourself from 60% to 100% in half a day ... I'd call that ABUSE of the mod. When does a mod cross the line from time-saving to being performance-boosting? Should we give Legendary titles to people that do this? And is such use what the mod-writer intended?
Three types of people have posted in here:
1) Those who did the title without modifying their game client, who are also disappointed that it's been cheapened and can be achieved with 5% of the original effort needed when it was implemented into the game.
2) Those who used the mod to get their own title and take offence to me saying they got it on the cheap. Plenty of these. They are as offended by my comments as I am by their use of it to steal the title.
3) People that have little interest in the subject or knowledge about it who make a habit of entering random threads and trying to look cool by making throw away comments and putting people down.
I am quite sure that this discussion has drawn the attention to use of the mod and may even increase usage. But come on, there's a link to it on the official GW Wiki! It's well known and as I said in my OP, LGMC is the third-most maxed title you see popping up in Kamadan ... and it's evident why.
Can I also clarify that this is not an attack on the modding community. I have enjoyed some great mods in many games: RTW, CS: Source, even Kick Off 2 (bet no-one here knows what that is).
This is a very, very smart mod, a really fine piece of programming. And I would suggest that use of this mod to put someone on 99.7% out of their misery is quite a reasonable and understandable thing. I am not a grind Nazi. But using the mod to take yourself from 60% to 100% in half a day ... I'd call that ABUSE of the mod. When does a mod cross the line from time-saving to being performance-boosting? Should we give Legendary titles to people that do this? And is such use what the mod-writer intended?
e
T
T
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zwei2stein
Now, the reall concern is indeed Gaile "looking into it".
I think its safe to say that if results are unfavorable for modding community, OP is going to face some massive abuse. BTW, do we have his IGN? |
Who do YOU think YOU are? What you gonna do? Hack my PC?
See my comment above.... it's not an attack on the modding community. However maybe you should attract the attention of the moderators for the threatening overtones here?
e
Quote:
| I never cease to be amazed how full of hate GWGuru is. So many people on here would never act like this in real life; they'd get their faces filled in within 10 seconds. |
Quote:
| Torqual, there also have been many "traditionalists" posting that have never used the mod, but also stated they don't care about others using it. |
Maybe I'm an animal lover?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by zwei2stein
Now, the reall concern is indeed Gaile "looking into it".
I think its safe to say that if results are unfavorable for modding community, OP is going to face some massive abuse. BTW, do we have his IGN? |
> ANet installs spyware to detect texmod, bans accounts: (this aint gonna happen, im sure) lawsuits
> ANet makes their game incompatible with texmod (complete rewrite of architechture, not likely) people carry on using photoshop, not a massive difference
> ANet changes the cartographer title mechanics (kill all monsters in NM?), not gonna happen, too much effort for no return
Any more?
I think we can safely say that nothing is going to happen.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torqual
When does a mod cross the line from time-saving to being performance-boosting? Should we give Legendary titles to people that do this? And is such use what the mod-writer intended?
|
So how do you prevent this from happening?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torqual
My whole point was that use of the mod is widespread - check the OP.
Three types of people have posted in here: 1) Those who did the title without modifying their game client, who are also disappointed that it's been cheapened and can be achieved with 5% of the original effort needed when it was implemented into the game. 2) Those who used the mod to get their own title and take offence to me saying they got it on the cheap. Plenty of these. They are as offended by my comments as I am by their use of it to steal the title. 3) People that have little interest in the subject or knowledge about it who make a habit of entering random threads and trying to look cool by making throw away comments and putting people down. |
5) People that have both interest and vast knowledge about the subject who provide compelling counterarguments against the OP argument.
etc.
lists are only as complete as the list maker's intentions.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torqual
My whole point was that use of the mod is widespread - check the OP.
Three types of people have posted in here: 1) Those who did the title without modifying their game client, who are also disappointed that it's been cheapened and can be achieved with 5% of the original effort needed when it was implemented into the game. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torqual
2) Those who used the mod to get their own title and take offence to me saying they got it on the cheap. Plenty of these. They are as offended by my comments as I am by their use of it to steal the title.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torqual
3) People that have little interest in the subject or knowledge about it who make a habit of entering random threads and trying to look cool by making throw away comments and putting people down.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torqual
I am quite sure that this discussion has drawn the attention to use of the mod and may even increase usage. But come on, there's a link to it on the official GW Wiki! It's well known and as I said in my OP, LGMC is the third-most maxed title you see popping up in Kamadan ... and it's evident why.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torqual
Can I also clarify that this is not an attack on the modding community. I have enjoyed some great mods in many games: RTW, CS: Source, even Kick Off 2 (bet no-one here knows what that is).
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torqual
This is a very, very smart mod, a really fine piece of programming. And I would suggest that use of this mod to put someone on 99.7% out of their misery is quite a reasonable and understandable thing. I am not a grind Nazi. But using the mod to take yourself from 60% to 100% in half a day ... I'd call that ABUSE of the mod. When does a mod cross the line from time-saving to being performance-boosting? Should we give Legendary titles to people that do this? And is such use what the mod-writer intended?
|
Please, for the sake of the community accept that you are wrong and get over it.
e
Quote:
|
What are the options? > ANet installs spyware to detect texmod, bans accounts: (this aint gonna happen, im sure) lawsuits > ANet makes their game incompatible with texmod (complete rewrite of architechture, not likely) people carry on using photoshop, not a massive difference > ANet changes the cartographer title mechanics (kill all monsters in NM?), not gonna happen, too much effort for no return Any more? I think we can safely say that nothing is going to happen. |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Torqual
1) Those who did the title without modifying their game client, who don't care if others use a mod.
|
One point I'd like to bring up: for Cartography guides/mods to be useful, "traditional" GMCs had to contribute to them. Now why would those GMCs object to people using the guides or mods?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by elektra_lucia
Therefore the reason that an 'official wiki' page says the program is some what allowed? Although, I have never used texmod. What exactly is it, dll files or what? It's easy to ban dll files.
|
