Now everyone wait a second please.
I see many "not illegal" statements here, but no one quotes a source. Has there actually been a confirmation on this from Anet? Did anyone ask a lawyer? I don't know exactly what GWx2 does, and the FAQ on that website won't tell (it is "under construction" for about half a year now), but I wouldn't be surprised if whatever it does could be interpreted as a breach of §3 (b) and/or (d) of the user agreement:
Quote:
3. LICENSE TO USE
...
You may not ... (b) modify, adapt, reverse engineer or decompile the Software, or otherwise attempt to derive source code from the Software; ... or (d) otherwise use the Software or the Service except as expressly provided in this Agreement. ...
|
Even if GWx2 does not modify the executable file or the data file on the hard disk, it still modifies what the program does once executed.
Now, I am not a lawyer myself, so I don't know if this actually is a breach of the EULA. I'd just rather be cautious with saying either aye or nay, as long as it hasn't been officially confirmed. Has it been confirmed? If so, someone please post a link!
That said, I'm pretty sure Anet never has banned and never will ban anyone for running two copies of GW on the same computer, as long as the means that are emplyed to do that are not harmful to the game. I've been doing it for ages myself, using the old hex editor method to actually hack the executable (which definitely is a breach of the EULA!) and I'm absolutely fine with it. Not every breach of the EULA will automatically result in a ban. some harmless ones are tolerated. Fortunately, people at Anet have common sense.
