A helm would fit much more this class than a floatig rock

|
Originally Posted by Odinius
On my last holiday I picked up a statuette of Athena which looks like the perfect paragon imo.
http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...e/S6001399.jpg http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...e/S6001400.jpg http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...e/S6001401.jpg http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...e/S6001404.jpg http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...e/S6001405.jpg http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...e/S6001407.jpg http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...e/S6001408.jpg http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...e/S6001409.jpg http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...e/S6001411.jpg |
|
Originally Posted by haggus71
the North Africa argument blows. If you are using that, it would be Zulu themed, for the short broad headed Sunburst spear. The only Bronze-age North African warriors were Phoenicians(Carthage) and Egyptians, who wore similar armor, with helmets. If you want to use that sub-Saharan argument, however, why aren't they wearing loincloths? The Zulu even fought the British in those.
|
| The armor is Mediterranean in design, very much stylized after the Spartan/Corinthian style mentioned before. The helm makes much more sense. |
|
Originally Posted by Surena
Zulu? Sub-Saharan Argument? Are you on drugs? What does this have to do with North Africa? Carthaginians had medit. weaponry/designs anyway, not to forget famous greek commanders.
No, Paragons resemble more skirmishers than Hoplites/Phalangites, that's why a Corinthian Helmet seems retarded while a pilos seems more appropriate (while it outclassed the Corinthian helmet by miles anyway - thus marking its decline). |
|
Originally Posted by Mitchel
/signed because some scrubby Sunspear Scout can have it and we can't.
|