1) More storage space
2) The ability to use an auction system
I know one of the main points of GW is the fact we don't need to pay a subscription. However I reckon some of the reasons we don't get some of these things (I may be wrong here) is that it'll take more server space/usage which in the end costs Anet. If this is true, would you be willing to pay a small subscription ($2 a month maybe?) to have more storage and a decent working in-game auction.
This would be a totally optional thing, with the game staying exactly as is for the most part, but with the option to pay for this service (like the crafting material upgrade but for real money). This is not a sudgestion so this is why I've put it here and not in the idea forum. Just wondered what people thought?
Would you pay a subscription for ...
2 pages • Page 1
Absolutely not on both. They second a monthly fee is introduced, I'm outta here, period. Doesn't matter, Gaile has said countless times that they will never have a subscription fee, which is smart.
Not that I don't like those two improvements, quite the contrary. But, I can understand the issues with server costs, and understand that it is a hurdle. I'm not holding my breath on any of it, but if they want to treat us, more power to them.
Not that I don't like those two improvements, quite the contrary. But, I can understand the issues with server costs, and understand that it is a hurdle. I'm not holding my breath on any of it, but if they want to treat us, more power to them.
w
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vandal2k6
However I reckon some of the reasons we don't get some of these things (I may be wrong here) is that it'll take more server space/usage which in the end costs Anet.
|
I can, with no doubt, say this is wrong. the expensive part is the traffic. bandwidth. in comparison to that, the space each account takes on the servers is nothing. we get limited storage to stop us from hording everything, and keep a more vivid economy.
Like most of the responses already, I have to say No to a subscription. I would however pay a one-time reasonable fee in order to open up more storage for my account. However, I think it should still be capped in order to stop the hording issue that foo mentioned.
Some examples:
$10 fee to open up an additional 20 slots in storage. $20 for 40 slots. No more than 40 extra slots may be opened.
$10 fee to increase all material stacks from 250 to 500. (May be an issue when trading)
I doubt I would pay a fee for an auction house.
Some examples:
$10 fee to open up an additional 20 slots in storage. $20 for 40 slots. No more than 40 extra slots may be opened.
$10 fee to increase all material stacks from 250 to 500. (May be an issue when trading)
I doubt I would pay a fee for an auction house.
g
paying for auction house would be stupid ... in that case it would all depend on how many people will pay to use it.
mostly only 100k+ traders and casuals with way too much RL money would buy it ... making it pointless to buy for ordinary masses (stuff they wouldnt ever afford OR godly unided purple 10-21 water wands).
Point of using auction house for selling is that everyone can purchase your stuff so that it makes dis1 spamming obsolete.
Point of using auction house for buying is that that you can see everyones stuff and pick what you like.
if ahouse is restricted to few people, it does not happen.
mostly only 100k+ traders and casuals with way too much RL money would buy it ... making it pointless to buy for ordinary masses (stuff they wouldnt ever afford OR godly unided purple 10-21 water wands).
Point of using auction house for selling is that everyone can purchase your stuff so that it makes dis1 spamming obsolete.
Point of using auction house for buying is that that you can see everyones stuff and pick what you like.
if ahouse is restricted to few people, it does not happen.
An auction house would (I'm assuming) greatly decrease the amount of spam in outposts and cities. It would be a much better way for sellers to show their goods because they wouldn't have to spam it every 5 seconds. It would benefit buyers because it would be easier to find something they want instead of waiting for the specific buyer to advertise. Generally, it would make things easier for everyone.
I will NEVER pay ANY subscription at ALL for play GW, you can totally forget about it!
My main idea (when I bought GW) was play forever and ever for free without worries about stupid subscription fees. I am not forced to buy new campaigns, but if they expand a game I love, I must buy that expansions, it's a MUST if they make me love this game; so .. it's like a subscription, but I am NOT forced if I wanna play (I LOVE THAT!)
My main idea (when I bought GW) was play forever and ever for free without worries about stupid subscription fees. I am not forced to buy new campaigns, but if they expand a game I love, I must buy that expansions, it's a MUST if they make me love this game; so .. it's like a subscription, but I am NOT forced if I wanna play (I LOVE THAT!)

