
CONFIRMED - heroes will be able to travel to Tyria and Cantha
3 pages • Page 3
T
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paperfly
Disappointed, as I'm generally opposed to the hero system, but not unexpected. Ah well, I'm pretty much resigned to the massive drop in difficulty and in social experience.
![]() |
Guildies will still be far better than heroes will be, but I'm glad for Heroes - I'm good with henchmen and the heroes will allow me to finish some of those harder missions with Masters in Cantha a little easier.

S
Quote:
| Oh yes, the rich social experience you get from Guild Wars.... all those 12 year olds running their Arcane Echo Mending warriors while shouting 'lol newbz' and other random gibberish. |
Seriously, I'm not interested in playing what amounts to Neverwinter Nights 2 offline, only without dialogue trees. I lost a lot of interest in Neverwinter Nights one* because of what the henchman system did to the gameplay.
*the mod community was a saving grace. And most of those didn't use henchmen since they were a pain to assemble!
T
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paperfly
Disappointed, as I'm generally opposed to the hero system, but not unexpected. Ah well, I'm pretty much resigned to the massive drop in difficulty and in social experience.
![]() |
If I have to choose between using the normal Tyria henches or take my own heroes then its an easy choice, its equally easy to choose between playing with friends or with heroes.
g
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paperfly
Disappointed, as I'm generally opposed to the hero system, but not unexpected. Ah well, I'm pretty much resigned to the massive drop in difficulty and in social experience.
![]() |
Think this way: Heroes will only ammount to three character slots for groups. Thats three micro-managed (decent) builds that you can run along with your own. It doesn't discount the other four "standard" henchmen that everyone has come to know over the course of the game,nor does it mean that they are any smarter than those henchmen when it comes to complex decisions.
So...even if the groups you describe always took all the available heroes, you still have four slots that "middle of the road" players or players who like to PuG don't really want filled out by henchies.
@gr3g: yes, they will. Not everyone will like everything you do. its what makes each of us unique

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LoKi Foxfire
Oh yes, the rich social experience you get from Guild Wars.... all those 12 year olds running their Arcane Echo Mending warriors while shouting 'lol newbz' and other random gibberish.
|

Anyway, ty A-Net. Pretty handy if you still need to do the bonusses in the less crowded mission places. A very nice add, and I will surely make a lot of use of this feature in the near future.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Knightsaber Sith
Gaile always talks in purple cause she's special
![]() |
My earlier post was meant to be taken as sarcastic.
I admit, at first it will be fun to try tyrian and canthan missions with heroes, but they wouldn't be nearly as challenging. Nightfall characters will be able to run through these missions. No challenge = no fun.
It's hard for me to believe Anet will allow heroes into tyria and cantha (yes I saw what Gaile said). The missions and quests would be waaaaay to easy with multiple heroes and would ruin the fun.
I admit, at first it will be fun to try tyrian and canthan missions with heroes, but they wouldn't be nearly as challenging. Nightfall characters will be able to run through these missions. No challenge = no fun.
It's hard for me to believe Anet will allow heroes into tyria and cantha (yes I saw what Gaile said). The missions and quests would be waaaaay to easy with multiple heroes and would ruin the fun.
Quote:
| Eh, you dont have to use the hero's, you can use them. |
...In short, there's such a thing as adding options that weaken the core design of your game. For instance, an infinite health code for PvE would wreck the game, no matter how optional. This isn't anywhere near that bad (obviously), but it's going to have long-term reprecussions.
Quote:
| Lol, you do realize you just mentioned 3 different professions. |
Quote:
| Amazing. People will complain about just about anything. Truly amazing. |
Do you want a full list of the things I disagree with the majority here about? The reason it appears that people will complain "about just anything" is that 9/10ths of the community complains about the stuff I like and celebrates the things I don't. Effectively, they can't ever please everybody... And it's all my fault.
For the record, the Star Wars prequels were on par with the originals, the Lord of the Rings trilogy was an exercise in incompetent filmmaking compounded by the director's utter incomprehension of the source material, and Aliens is the worst movie of the tetralogy - not the best. Shall I go on?
M
I have no problem with people complaining within reason and they have substantial proof of why they are complaining.
There my friend is where we disagree...
4,5 and 6 owned 1,2 and 3.
Alien films are watchable once and once only.
LOTR was saved by the scenery but the has nothing against the book.
Quote:
| For the record, the Star Wars prequels were on par with the originals, the Lord of the Rings trilogy was an exercise in incompetent filmmaking compounded by the director's utter incomprehension of the source material, and Aliens is the worst movie of the tetralogy - not the best. Shall I go on? |
4,5 and 6 owned 1,2 and 3.
Alien films are watchable once and once only.
LOTR was saved by the scenery but the has nothing against the book.


