Additional information said by Gaile Grey, ripped blatantly
from GWO:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gaile Grey
No mini-pets have been customized, ever. Not the Kuunivang, not the birthday gifts, right? So why would we customize these mini-pets?" That is nearly a direct quote from one of the chief designers of the game.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gaile Grey (questioned about previous comment)
I already have expressed the concerns that have been shared with me; I did and do understand the concern about this on many levels, yes.
I do not foresee that this decision will change, but I will be happy to relay comments, as always.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gaile Grey
don't see any UA prohibition against selling items for in-game money. It's done every hour of every day. And how that seller originally obtained the item isn't relevant in this case, although I do appreciate that others feel differently. If you consider that those who purchased the CE were spending real world money to, in part, acquire the Kuunie, they were certainly not prohibited by the UA or anything else from selling for in-game gold. (Obviously selling for real world cash is prohibited!) While I know some can make a distinction between buying the game and buying a magazine--a degree of separation, if you will--I believe that the designers don't agree that there is a reason to customize the pets.
Let me add to that to say that if someone makes a bunch of in-game gold and then sells the gold for real-world money, he would be breaking the UA. But that would seem really circular to me: Buy a magazine to get an item to sell for gold to then sell the gold for money.
|
That last comment kinda concerns me. A tad too calavier.
