Curse

Fenrik de Arvis · Aug 26, 2007, 09:11 AM // 09:11

completely agreed
/sign

Agent001 · Aug 26, 2007, 12:38 PM // 12:38

Definitely, making it character based just is not right!

DOCB22 · Aug 26, 2007, 01:54 PM // 13:54

I Agree HoM should be account based not Charactor based. Why do they keep doing this kind of thing to us. Sigh

electrolust · Aug 26, 2007, 02:46 PM // 14:46

Yes .

Velath · Aug 26, 2007, 03:01 PM // 15:01

Yes indeed .

Apharot · Aug 26, 2007, 08:12 PM // 20:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3D House of Beef

No. You CANNOT put a minipet in storage and pick it up with another character once you put it in the hall, it gets customized. This is what we are talking about.

No. Any titles related to previous deeds are going to GW2 characters. No one else. Why would we imagine there were even Sunspears off in the future?

Just to set things straight. No one expects that whatever titles/minipets/gear is awarded to GW2 characters as a reward for our efforts in GW are going to give some kind of gameplay advantage to GW2 characters. I am sure the game mechanics will be quite different. No one expects the HoM to be some kind of Xunlai chest that gives GW2 characters my extra Charr carvings.

You missed my point. It starts here, it continues. Next it'll be "Well. If I make another mesmer, why can't they have the skills I already have?" The game is fine. I don't think you guys quite realize how good you already have it. A chest that allows you to share not only equipment, but stuff like iron, steel, etc, with your other chars? There's a lot of games out there that forbid that due to character seperation.

clarke · Aug 26, 2007, 08:47 PM // 20:47

Yes i agree with the first post wholeheartedly, we shouldnt be punished for playing a variety of characters and i hope that Anet fix the hall situation before, or soon after GW:EN's release

jayhau7 · Aug 26, 2007, 11:03 PM // 23:03

Yes yes and yes. now lets hope anet actually listens to their players...

MithranArkanere · Aug 26, 2007, 11:18 PM // 23:18

PLEASE Anet...
I don't want to dust my old "Lil' Bastard Voodoo Kit".

Fix the Hall or a lot of bad karma from all those fellow players will hit you hard.

svecka · Aug 26, 2007, 11:19 PM // 23:19

I'm so disappointed in HoM. The hole promotion of HoM is one big screw up. I seriously hope you fix this, espacily with caracter based HoM titles and minipets.

AreanNet next time don't promote HoM as something big, its a pile of crap. Can't help myself but i'm so disappointed in HoM. The biggest disappointment in entire GW time, i need to take a break before i burn preorder box!

Derrick the Nomad · Aug 26, 2007, 11:33 PM // 23:33

/signed

make it account based.

Lluvia · Aug 26, 2007, 11:40 PM // 23:40

/signed

HoM is just a great disappointment for me at the moment. Not a single monument is good. Instead of my beautiful Paragon Obsidian armor I get an Assassin/Dervish monument. Sousuke wears his normal armor, when I put him in the heroes monument. I need to reach incredibly high tiers of the pvp titles to be able to display them etc.

Iinvisi · Aug 26, 2007, 11:42 PM // 23:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atom

Yes. At the very least, the minipets should be account based.

If you mean you can still transfer minis to other characters other than the one that used them in HoM, PLEASE YES!

T H E S T A R · Aug 27, 2007, 12:58 AM // 00:58

/signed account based please >>>yes<<<

Yawgmoth · Aug 27, 2007, 01:38 AM // 01:38

Definately and obviously YES!

I couldn't believe they can make something worse than the automamted tournament reward system (was a bad joke) but HoM certainly wins the GW Disappointment Of The Year award.

Take for example the Armors monument, it's just horrible. Not only it doesn't show what armors you actually have on that character, it makes you have to get all ascended armors for ONE DAMN CHARACTER to complete it! If it was account based, the cost to max it would be the same but I'd be able to make 2-4 different armors for different chars that could actually use them (as opposed to making them all for one, then salvaging or storing on a separate mule character... bad joke Anet...)

More Outrage · Aug 27, 2007, 02:02 AM // 02:02

YES!!!!!

Biggest disapointment ever. I can`t believe this is how it`s gonna work.

And what`s with the title shrine? No place for my PvE titles? Stuff PvP`ers, like they really care about the HoM, OK some might but the majority don`t and it will force them to play a little more PvE stuff when GW2 comes out unless there`s an easy way to do that when the time comes. I`m not even gonna get into the mini pet customizing crap. Time to calm down, lol.

Just hoping they`re still working on this and take note of the majority.

Shadowmere · Aug 27, 2007, 02:46 AM // 02:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Apharot

You missed my point. It starts here, it continues. Next it'll be "Well. If I make another mesmer, why can't they have the skills I already have?" The game is fine. I don't think you guys quite realize how good you already have it. A chest that allows you to share not only equipment, but stuff like iron, steel, etc, with your other chars? There's a lot of games out there that forbid that due to character seperation.

The game is fine and we aren't asking to have titles and skills free across all our characters. If you were actually paying attention to what's being discussed in this thread you'd see we aren't talking about xunlai chests or anything, but about the Hall of Monuments which if we got our way wouldn't transfer anything (except X reward/bonus in GW2) but instead let us put ALL our titles and achievements in one place to be displayed, not given to our other characters.

And that's a hearty YES to making HoM account based

Phantom Gun · Aug 27, 2007, 02:58 AM // 02:58

It doesn't really mather to me that much although I thought for some reason it would be. As much as I try to play only 1 character I just can't do it. Also for the titles I hope they add some pve ones to HoM. I mean you would think for a pve expansion that there would be some pve titles in there. Maybe they were locked out for the preview weekend, or maybe it's thier way of getting more people to do it.

Anyway before I get to off topic, I would say yes.

Death By Ketchup · Aug 27, 2007, 03:21 AM // 03:21

I can understand weapons and armours being character based, but I do think the rest should be account based.