Aug 25, 2007, 10:50 PM // 22:50
|
#21
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Defending Fort Aspenwood
Profession: E/
|
Yes, I customized all my minipets to be able to place them into HoM, but now I learned that my other chars cannot use them anymore. I hope you (ANet) can fix this.
|
|
|
Aug 25, 2007, 11:16 PM // 23:16
|
#22
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: California
|
I say absolutely yes as well. HoM seems really broken at the moment. Although I guess having a broken HoM with the possibility for it to improve is better than no HoM at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jongo River
Yes. Players shouldn't be pressured into focusing on only one character.
|
That's the issue in a nutshell. I appreciate that they're satisfying the people that are most hardcore; of course the people who put the most effort in should reap the greatest rewards, but I think it'd be best if they gave more scraps to people like me who have their 2000+ hours spread across several characters, because I think they alienate their largest group of loyal players the way it is currently. I think that investment in multiple characters is a natural result of the level cap being relatively low, which is a big part of Anet's anti-grind creedo if I recall correctly.
The rest of my post gets increasingly rant-like I think, lol, o well...
I hate to possibly sound ungrateful for what I do get, but isn't it obvious that the best way to get people buying GW2 is to give them a pleasureable experience in GW1 until it's time to pick up a new game? I think the strategy of keeping people busy promotes addictive behaviour in players rather than creating casual players who love the game, recommend it to friends, and eagerly anticipate the sequel because they remember how fun the first one was.
I guess they made it this way keep loyal players busy until GW2. Well fact is that there's plenty in the game to keep us busy, I think they should put more thought into trying to give the most satisfying experience to as many people as possible. But anyway, other parts of GWEN should still be fun I think. :/
Just my 2cents.
|
|
|
Aug 25, 2007, 11:46 PM // 23:46
|
#23
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Finland
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Friar Khan
I say absolutely yes as well. HoM seems really broken at the moment. Although I guess having a broken HoM with the possibility for it to improve is better than no HoM at all.
That's the issue in a nutshell. I appreciate that they're satisfying the people that are most hardcore; of course the people who put the most effort in should reap the greatest rewards, but I think it'd be best if they gave more scraps to people like me who have their 2000+ hours spread across several characters, because I think they alienate their largest group of loyal players the way it is currently. I think that investment in multiple characters is a natural result of the level cap being relatively low, which is a big part of Anet's anti-grind creedo if I recall correctly.
The rest of my post gets increasingly rant-like I think, lol, o well...
I hate to possibly sound ungrateful for what I do get, but isn't it obvious that the best way to get people buying GW2 is to give them a pleasureable experience in GW1 until it's time to pick up a new game? I think the strategy of keeping people busy promotes addictive behaviour in players rather than creating casual players who love the game, recommend it to friends, and eagerly anticipate the sequel because they remember how fun the first one was.
I guess they made it this way keep loyal players busy until GW2. Well fact is that there's plenty in the game to keep us busy, I think they should put more thought into trying to give the most satisfying experience to as many people as possible. But anyway, other parts of GWEN should still be fun I think. :/
Just my 2cents.
|
I couldn't /sign your post more. I totally agree and I can def. wait for GW2 to come out. I still have tons to do in the current game and I'm in no hurry. I don't see why people with multiple characters and separate achievements on them shouldn't be rewarded too. The game actually promotes having many many characters. When GW2 comes out I do plan on buying it and I'm already expecting it to be a great game.
|
|
|
Aug 25, 2007, 11:56 PM // 23:56
|
#24
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Guild: [EYE]
Profession: Rt/A
|
/signed
It should have been so from the start. I cant believe it's not so.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 12:16 AM // 00:16
|
#25
|
Hall Hero
|
Yes. Yes it should.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 01:59 AM // 01:59
|
#26
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Profession: Mo/
|
Yes. Also, minipets should be customized to your ACCOUNT; not the character.
What's the harm in sharing them with your own characters :3
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 02:52 AM // 02:52
|
#27
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: Limited Liability Company [LLC]
Profession: E/
|
Yes, I have eight characters, and I want to spend time with all of them, not focus on one.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 02:54 AM // 02:54
|
#28
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Canada Eh!
Guild: Test
Profession: Mo/E
|
yes i think it should be
/sign
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 03:09 AM // 03:09
|
#29
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Sep 2006
Guild: Englishmen Don't Drink [Tea]
Profession: W/R
|
indubitably, not worth it otherwise
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 03:10 AM // 03:10
|
#30
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NYC
Guild: The Circle Of Nine[NINE]
Profession: E/N
|
In a word..."Yes!"
/signed
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 03:54 AM // 03:54
|
#31
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Guild: Ogmios Graybeards
Profession: W/
|
No, it should be fixed by the people that screwed it up in the first place.
KANE
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 03:56 AM // 03:56
|
#32
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chile
Guild: Fat insecure Neurotic Emotional [FINE]
Profession: W/
|
/yes /yes /yes /yes /ponder .../yes
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 04:00 AM // 04:00
|
#33
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Zul'Aman
Guild: Umes Uranger U[bot]
|
Imo all titles should've been account based to begin with...
/signed
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 05:27 AM // 05:27
|
#34
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Jan 2006
Profession: W/N
|
Yes, because in order to have all the different elite armor sets for even a couple different classes would completely fill your inventory if you don't have them on multiple characters. Not to mention green items, and titles...
Plus in this game, where you can reach lvl 20 in relitively no time, It made sence to make lots of characters to try different things out, in GW2 that is supposed to have a much higher lvl cap, I really don't think people are going to be making 10-20 characters like some have in this game. Are all their accomplishments going to go to waist just because they did them on other characters than the one they name their GW2 character after?
Last edited by Vincaro; Aug 26, 2007 at 05:32 AM // 05:32..
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 05:30 AM // 05:30
|
#35
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: All over Tyria, Cantha, & Elona
Guild: The Eternal Night Vanguard [TEN]
Profession: R/
|
Yes!!! And I agree especially about the mini pet thing. I guess The hall isn't very far in, but you still have to get the scrolls and such and doing it on like every single character can be a burden, because they each have different armor, titles, etc.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 06:06 AM // 06:06
|
#36
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
/signed to making HoM account based.
/signed to making titles account based.
/signed to just about anything that allows me to USE the 9 character slots I currently have, without punishing me for playing more than one character.
Titles were a great idea. Making them have measurable in game effects and then making them character based was not a good idea.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 06:27 AM // 06:27
|
#37
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: The Bold Silver Dragons
Profession: W/R
|
No! What the heck is this? As if you can't just drop something off in your storage and pick it up with another char, now we are worried about something like mini pets too. So you create a new char, and it's automatically a commander in the sunspears? You guys are just asking for too much now. Starting to remind of the people who were complaining that because they didn't pre-order GW:EN that it wasn't fair that they weren't allowed to participate in the preview weekend. It's a game, it does NOT need to have this much drama added into it.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 07:54 AM // 07:54
|
#38
|
Ascalonian Squire
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apharot
No! What the heck is this? As if you can't just drop something off in your storage and pick it up with another char, now we are worried about something like mini pets too.
|
No. You CANNOT put a minipet in storage and pick it up with another character once you put it in the hall, it gets customized. This is what we are talking about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apharot
So you create a new char, and it's automatically a commander in the sunspears?
|
No. Any titles related to previous deeds are going to GW2 characters. No one else. Why would we imagine there were even Sunspears off in the future?
Just to set things straight. No one expects that whatever titles/minipets/gear is awarded to GW2 characters as a reward for our efforts in GW are going to give some kind of gameplay advantage to GW2 characters. I am sure the game mechanics will be quite different. No one expects the HoM to be some kind of Xunlai chest that gives GW2 characters my extra Charr carvings.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 08:34 AM // 08:34
|
#39
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
Which is why I don't understand the minipet customization - if we're not getting those minipets back in GW2 (and I hope we're not), why worry about rarity within HoM?
This is just my opinion, but HoM really should be about recording any achievements we like for our own satisfaction and each monument should then unlock an account wide bonus in GW2, once it's got enough stuff in. Nice and simple.
What I fear is that there will be tiers of bonuses, tied to different levels of title or value of minipets and, effectively transfering a large chunk of elitism into the game, right at the start.
|
|
|
Aug 26, 2007, 08:49 AM // 08:49
|
#40
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Feb 2006
Guild: Brotherhood of Kai
|
/signed
most definately!
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:27 PM // 22:27.
|