Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > Gladiator's Arena

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Aug 15, 2005, 11:44 PM // 23:44   #1
Forge Runner
 
jesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Guild: Penguin Village
Profession: Mo/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default Warrior VS Ranger

Not in the conventional sense.. I'm making a new char, and I want to know what would be better for a secondary. These are the things I'm looking for in my secondary class:

a. attack speed
b. survivability/healing

This is all I care about, I'm not going to use my secondary for anything else. Which class would you side with, and why?
jesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 15, 2005, 11:50 PM // 23:50   #2
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

You didn't even say what your primary and overall purpose is.

Ranger secondary is easily the worst overall of any others because most ranger skills require high expertise. Doesn't mean don't choose it but you really need a good reason to.

Frenzy vs TF. Mana hog and skill lockdown vs double damage. If you will be a frontliner and can sustain mana loss, TF. If you won't get hit much, Frenzy.

Defense/Healing. Tactics>Ranger stances in pure depth and usefulness.
Zeru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 12:11 AM // 00:11   #3
Forge Runner
 
jesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Guild: Penguin Village
Profession: Mo/
Default

Well I purposefully left that out.. to cut down on the number of flames I would recieve. For my intentions, I'd go with flurry vs TF... I'm considering ranger because of the troll unguent, but that would mean BM for TF, and wilderness for that.... I don't know.
jesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 12:42 AM // 00:42   #4
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Illinois
Guild: None
Default

Well you see, by not giving information, we can't really be too much of help. Troll Unguent is one of the worst skills in the game in lots of situations, primarily being organized PvP or even organized PvE, where it functions as a much worse version of Healing Breeze. On the other hand, in certain situations, like random arena, it is acceptable and needed, though still not very good.
White Designs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 12:47 AM // 00:47   #5
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: XoO
Profession: Me/
Default

Omg. It seems that very few of you know why a ranger/warrior is so dominating. First of all. Its NOT about raw dmg. Apply poison + cyclone axe. Bam. Thats mass spreading poison. Throw in the CONSTANT use of Tigers Fury...lets see a warrior do that....and you will dominate. Not to mention other great stances. WHIRLING DEFENSE... When you are being mass targeted slap on whirling defense/drydars depending on the situation. When you arent being attacked use Tigers Fury and get Deep woulds and poison on the enemy as fast as possible. I find that this build can tank ELEMENTAL dmg hella better than any warrior. This comes from the +30 ele defense on the ranger armor. Also, to counter the physical dmg, you would just use whirling defense or other stances that can block.

WilyMo
Wilymo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 12:52 AM // 00:52   #6
Just Plain Fluffy
 
Ensign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Guild: Idiot Savants
Default

Tiger's Fury is practically unplayable at 10 energy. Frenzy is the only realistic attack speed buff (unless you're using IW, then Flurry is playable)

For defense, Tactics will fit in seemlessly while the Ranger offers little.

Warrior is generally a much better secondary, and I don't see any reason to take Ranger over it for your purposes.

Peace,
-CxE
__________________
Don't argue with idiots. They bring you to their level and beat you with experience.
Ensign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 01:02 AM // 01:02   #7
Forge Runner
 
jesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Guild: Penguin Village
Profession: Mo/
Default

Those are good points, Ensign, thanks for the reply. I was kind of forgetting I wouldn't have expertise as a ranger secondary.. that makes it a lot tougher. And Wilymo, maybe you should have read the topic first. XD
Ah well, you made me laugh.
jesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 01:16 AM // 01:16   #8
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: Dark Horizons
Default

Another thing to consider with the warrior line is neither frenzy nor flurry have attributes and many of the tactics skills can be reasonably used with few to no points in them. If you go ranger you'll suffer from high energy costs and dramatic point spreads. It would probably help if we knew your primary class though
Tuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 04:03 AM // 04:03   #9
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: XoO
Profession: Me/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ensign
Tiger's Fury is practically unplayable at 10 energy. Frenzy is the only realistic attack speed buff (unless you're using IW, then Flurry is playable)

For defense, Tactics will fit in seemlessly while the Ranger offers little.

Warrior is generally a much better secondary, and I don't see any reason to take Ranger over it for your purposes.

Peace,
-CxE
Um....because with expertise at 9 you can spam TIgers FUry without ever runnig down to 0 energy. EVER. Lets see you do that with a warrior build. WHy dont you actually try something before you flame it. Please.
Wilymo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 04:05 AM // 04:05   #10
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: XoO
Profession: Me/
Default

I play a ranger/warrior. About the point spreading, I have 12 into Axe....9 into expertise. 8 into wilderness. 9 into tactics. I own. Eles have a hella hard time killing me, and I do crazy damage to them.
Wilymo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 04:09 AM // 04:09   #11
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilymo
I own.
No you don't
Zeru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 04:10 AM // 04:10   #12
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: Pirates of BBQ Bay
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilymo
Um....because with expertise at 9 you can spam TIgers FUry without ever runnig down to 0 energy. EVER. Lets see you do that with a warrior build. WHy dont you actually try something before you flame it. Please.
I'll be gentle here in the hopes that no one else will completely scream at you. The question was whether or not warrior or ranger should be the SECONDARY. That, by definition, means that expertise is not an option. I'm sure that people are well aware of the strengths of Tiger's Fury when expertise is in play - attacking another poster because you didn't understand the original question is bad form.

Ubi
Ubiquitous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 04:31 AM // 04:31   #13
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

True, warrior is a better secondary than ranger due to the fact most of ranger's skills cost too much energy for a warrior to handle. The only possible instance in which a ranger secondary may be useful is the beastmastery line with several useful low energy skills. R/W is a good condition giver, but a necro can easily beat a R/W by just plague transferring condition right back. So there's a limitation to a R/W as well.
Hell Marauder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16, 2005, 08:05 PM // 20:05   #14
Forge Runner
 
jesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Guild: Penguin Village
Profession: Mo/
Default

Thanks a lot guys, I went with warrior. Like people have pointed out, TF without expertise = not ftw. lol
Bonetti's Defense is always nice too. Thank you all for posting, even you crazy people that like to ramble off topic.
jesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2005, 06:31 AM // 06:31   #15
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: Dark Horizons
Profession: W/
Default

Ranger secondary is useful for dropping spirits.
bwookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 18, 2005, 06:54 AM // 06:54   #16
Desert Nomad
 
Ristaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Canada, eh?
Guild: Legion Of Valhalla
Profession: E/
Default

You should have gone Ranger/Warrior, my friend. You would have been playing ranger style (range) in the first stages of the game, but once you got expertise going and great attack skills such as Tiger's Fury, then you could be a better tank than the warrior/monk in your team.
Ristaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Meneldil The Campfire 4 Jan 12, 2006 06:15 PM // 18:15
ranger/warrior meowmeow The Campfire 3 Aug 20, 2005 02:37 PM // 14:37
warrior and monk or warrior and ranger? sir douglas The Campfire 5 May 10, 2005 08:37 PM // 20:37
Ranger/Warrior in pvp Mercury Rivenswift Gladiator's Arena 2 May 09, 2005 06:11 AM // 06:11
Sir_Sid The Campfire 2 May 03, 2005 05:49 AM // 05:49


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57 AM // 02:57.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("