Curse

Death_From_Above · Jun 12, 2007, 06:25 PM // 18:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lord Mendes

I actually agree with death_from_above (read my post at the beginning of the killcount thread), I just think he is destroying all hope of Anet taking us seriously. He proves altars are best for all the wrong reasons, and Anet won't take us seriously when the majority of our posts are attacks towards their ignorance. I also don't believe that HA will be fixed by changing back, I think it will take much more than that, and bringing altars would do very little for HA at this stage.

Iv gone through countless of times why alter capping is good and kill count is bad. In fact all i ever did was offer suggestions at first all backed up and all logical. It was when i found anet where not listerning and you had Galie greys comments such as *i think kill count is a great idea, and its highly succesful* that i started to lose faith in anet and get irritated with them. I stood back i watched and yes i was left watching for 9 months for something which if looked into you should be able to come to a decsion in one week.

I prove alters are the best for the wrong reasons? Explain please because if i recall the reason for alter capping being the best alternative has been explained by me many times. Randomway even did a huge long post going into depth about why alter maps where good and if i recall they where for all the good reasons.

Either way i feel no matter what we do anet will no react. We have nurse drawing up sensible judgements which basically disect the whole issue at the moment which come to the conclusion anet have given up on HA. We have Galie grey saying they have spent enough time on HA its now way further down there list. We have been told every 5 months ohhh were watching HA when any one watching it sees some changes need to be made. Honestly do you think i want to be here, as i said id rather be playing. Anet have made a list of empty promises to us. I guess im just getting frustrated now because almost 0 progress has been made. Whether your gentle with anet or whether your blunt.

As for alters going a little for HA at this stage i would like to know out of curiosity why you think this. Yes sure its a mess but alter capping is what people played for originaly. Its what they liked, i believe if it where to come back although HA would not be as popular as before it would definitely be much better. Anyways, can you tell me what is exactly wrong with trying? A weekend update or a week update, anet had no problem with trying other stuff like kill count or 6v6. So why not try 8v8 with alter maps again. It will be little effort, if i recall when 8v8 first came back HA was filled with districts, it was when people realised kill count on it wasnt exactly the best that its numbers quickly dwindled.

Good Game play = players no matter what happens

Its like if a food stores food quality decreases so its customers stop going there. When they increase its food quality back to how it was before you find customers slowly start comming back again.

Gimme Money Plzkthx · Jun 17, 2007, 12:31 AM // 00:31

Well, I've been gone for 6 days so I've only skimmed the last few pages, but I have several points/observations:

1. Why the RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GO are you people still reading DFA's posts? He can't spell altar right...

2. Altars (the current king of the hill mechanism might be better actually, either one is a great choice) were the best because you could run anything and win. Mad offense, mad defense, both had a good chance. Killcount is gg run offense or die. (note: this is a simplified 30 second version since I have other more important things to do atm, don't make me don a flame retardant suit)