Mar 22, 2008, 10:32 PM // 22:32
|
#1
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Apr 2007
Guild: none atm.. (formal [mini] guild)
Profession: W/E
|
Just a suggestion thats bein wondered by ha playas
I've been hearing a lot about how people all sudden want 6v6 back (due to either gettin tired of r/dway or just wastin time formin grp) so here's the question. do you people think that if anet were to make change to 6v6 would it fix the complaints of people? (personally i think answer is no ㅡ,.ㅡthere's no endin to complaints of people.) but hey suggestions never hurts ;D
|
|
|
Mar 22, 2008, 10:41 PM // 22:41
|
#2
|
Forge Runner
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by swift88
I've been hearing a lot about how people all sudden want 6v6 back (due to either gettin tired of r/dway or just wastin time formin grp) so here's the question. do you people think that if anet were to make change to 6v6 would it fix the complaints of people? (personally i think answer is no ㅡ,.ㅡthere's no endin to complaints of people.) but hey suggestions never hurts ;D
|
Old school holding
skill balance
broken tower
sacred temples
...
fck 6v6
|
|
|
Mar 22, 2008, 10:47 PM // 22:47
|
#3
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: May 2006
Profession: W/
|
deathspike > sway
|
|
|
Mar 22, 2008, 11:44 PM // 23:44
|
#4
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Aug 2005
Profession: W/E
|
I'd just like old ha back as in 8v8 4 way scarred earth ext ext.
|
|
|
Mar 22, 2008, 11:56 PM // 23:56
|
#5
|
Departed from Tyria
Join Date: May 2007
Guild: Clan Dethryche [dth]
Profession: R/
|
If someone could explain a main difference between 6v6 and 8v8, I could probably make a good judgment.
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2008, 12:05 AM // 00:05
|
#6
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shayne Hawke
If someone could explain a main difference between 6v6 and 8v8, I could probably make a good judgment.
|
sorry the most obvious response to your question just makes me laugh out loud :P
sorry i couldnt help it
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2008, 12:34 AM // 00:34
|
#7
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Profession: R/
|
bring on the R/D way... the more of that the easier it is to win and hold halls
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2008, 03:49 AM // 03:49
|
#8
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: May 2005
Guild: StP
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by swift88
I've been hearing a lot about how people all sudden want 6v6 back (due to either gettin tired of r/dway or just wastin time formin grp) so here's the question. do you people think that if anet were to make change to 6v6 would it fix the complaints of people? (personally i think answer is no ㅡ,.ㅡthere's no endin to complaints of people.) but hey suggestions never hurts ;D
|
People didnt want 6v6 in the first place, pls dont give them ideas.
And no it wouldnt fix anything.
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2008, 11:16 AM // 11:16
|
#9
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Guild: Lament of the Phoenix [LotP]
|
If there is no good skill balance then I want 6v6 back, first I didn't want 6v6 but now I want it.
The reason is because of the builds played.
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2008, 12:54 PM // 12:54
|
#10
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: May 2005
Guild: StP
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horace The Great
If there is no good skill balance then I want 6v6 back, first I didn't want 6v6 but now I want it.
The reason is because of the builds played.
|
Pls explain how you think changing team size will change the builds played?
Lets see
r/d way = 3 r/ds, trapper and 2 n/rts
legoway = war, 1 DA para, 1 ele, 1 mes 2 mo
b spike = 6 necros
r- spike = 3 ran, 1 para, 2 mo
a/d way = a/d, 2 ran, 2 n/rt, 1 mo
Builds wont change one bit, do not be deluded.
|
|
|
Mar 23, 2008, 12:57 PM // 12:57
|
#11
|
ǝuoʞoɯ
|
do not ever bring this up again.
__________________
Burning for your life
Some day it will burn out
Ready to sacrifice my life
For the perfect dream
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38 AM // 11:38.
|