Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > The Campfire

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jun 06, 2006, 03:17 AM // 03:17   #81
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Instead of saying expertise overpowered, why not say other primaries underpowered?

Thanks to the attribute, rangers are saved from being restricted to archer characters, e.g. touch rangers, thumpers, etc.

IMO, other primaries should be done in a similar level to encourage variety in primary builds.

Regarding touchies, I play RA a decent amount, and yes, they are very common, but I have yet to feel them being overpowered. If there is any build/class that can tip the winning chance in RA, that would be proper monks (not melee/smite ones).

EDIT:
Yes, I know monks are not required to win. But please do not lie to ourselves that monk's contribution to a team is just on par with the rest of the classes =/

The very few, if not the only, build that does not need a monk is IWAY, and it has been nerfed, which is quite saddening really.

Last edited by Nightwish; Jun 06, 2006 at 03:23 AM // 03:23..
Nightwish is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 03:29 AM // 03:29   #82
Hell's Protector
 
lyra_song's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Profession: R/Mo
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zulu123
Here's a Guild Wars description of Divine Favor the attribute. "For each rank of Divine Favor, allies are healed for 3.2 whenever you cast Monk spells on them. Several Monk skills, especially spells relating to energy gain and healing, become more effective with a higher Divine Favor." Do you know what that means? That DF is basically useless for any secondary profession skill/spell unlike Expertise.

So basically I am still waiting to see an example of that monstrous synergy between DF and some secondary profession skill.
Divine Boon, Offering of the Blood. Oh wait that got nerfed, thats how good that synergy was.

But unlike a Boon Prot, a Touch Ranger cant single handedly control a battle.
lyra_song is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 03:46 AM // 03:46   #83
Forge Runner
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Default

When I go into RA arena, my fighters/casters must be built to be anti boon prot.

I would take 1 skill with me in case of touch ranger.

That does kind of say both of them is over powered. As I always have to be ready to fight them as a threat, while there are no other build around that is as much pressuring as these 2. It is probably just these 2 are much more spread in population. But we do take anti warrior all the time, warrior must be godly too.

Expertise = godly
Skill (not spell, not attack) = godly
Life Steal = godly
Contemplation of Purity = godly
Knock Down = godly

The only reason Rit is not a good healer comparing to boon prot is that rit don't have CoP, hex tear rit apart. Most of them start using expel hex, but that is still far from being able to compare to CoP. CoP is not even an elite.

Considering Anet nerfed MM, they should nerf this too. Personally, I wouldn't have nerf neither.

Last edited by Vermilion Okeanos; Jun 06, 2006 at 03:55 AM // 03:55..
Vermilion Okeanos is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 04:06 AM // 04:06   #84
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Zorian Direspell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Default

I hate touch rangers (clone-skill touch rangers anyway, as I will concede the point that Prophecy only skill rangers are fine). I think the recharge (on Vamp touch skills) should be taken from 2 to 4 seconds, minimum (or they should be Skill -you become enchanted with (or receive condition) Vampirism. Your next successful attack steals X life, as this would allow for stripping and attack interruption or condition removal and attack disruption). And before someone tries telling me to "try playing one", I did. I went from random to teams in no time before losing 6-5 in sudden death to a Korean team (because someone got seperated from our group).

Our group wasn't balanced. It had two mesmers, a fire ele, and me. We didn't do much to offset each others weaknesses. But it didn't matter. With the build I played, I had 75% evasion (goodbye interrupting attacks) almost constantly, 25% faster speed (goodbye snares), condition removal and causation (goodbye anything not a hex ... oh, and your monk is bleeding now), a self heal for 65 per second (goodbye damage), and 65 dps (goodbye opponent). On a character with a base 75 armor (105 vs. elements).

The problem wasn't that the class couldn't be countered, it was that it did so many things, it was so self-contained, and so potentially devastating, that it took the focus of several foes at a time to deal with me (ineffectually as you can see). The only skills that consistently were a thorn in my side were blackout when coupled with degen hexes, and that only worked if I was feeling stupid enough to let a mesmer running at me get that close. In the TA battle I only died once (all four vs. me) and scored three of our kills, with the two others being made as the enemy ran from me.

The result of this situation is that the R/N substitutes skills for skill. The R/N has only one true concern, mesmers, and almost no limit on how far from the group they can extend or how long they can last. At least with an IW mesmer you can strip an enchantment (something that hurts many classes and builds). An assassin has to connect to hit, actually won't hit as hard,, and is subject to warrior hate. An air spike ele can be dropped with ease if someone knows what they're doing. An R/N is like all of these, but it uses less energy, has better defense, carries no enchantments, and has faster recharging skills. That an R/N need not even have the skill of the average assassin or IW mesmer for doing essentially the same thing is cause for concern. A nerf is needed.
Zorian Direspell is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 04:14 AM // 04:14   #85
Frost Gate Guardian
 
lactatemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Profession: W/
Default

I've got an idea, how about every single time a build comes along that you have to think of a way to overcome we call it overpowered and bitch and cry until it gets nerfed???

Sound good?

I mean, THINKING about a way to beat a set of skills really is just terribly inconvenient, isn't it? Why don't all you whiney people who just rag on creative builds think this over while you buy gold on ebay?

Edit: And how does a build that more often than not dies against two opponents (pvp) seem too powerful?

And don't just attribute this to me having a touch ranger, because while I do have one, I have also died a lot because of them.

I'm just SICK of people saying "Oh it's too hard and my normal build that I NEVER change doesn't work against it, so nerf it plz!!!"

Last edited by lactatemike; Jun 06, 2006 at 04:20 AM // 04:20..
lactatemike is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 04:23 AM // 04:23   #86
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Zorian Direspell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Default

Quote:
Why don't all you whiney people who just rag on creative builds think this over while you buy gold on ebay?
I would never think to whine about a creative build, but touch rangers aren't creative. They're obvious, generally skill-less and most likely used by those very e-bayers you so despise (who, I would imagine, also scoop net builds because they can't do things for themselves)

ed: stupid keyboard goofed my last sentence.
Zorian Direspell is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 04:32 AM // 04:32   #87
Krytan Explorer
 
pork soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGiant
They do wreck it a bit IN RANDOM ARENAS, they are overpowered (if you don't believe me please play random arenas for a few days Monk + Toucher = eek)
BUT this is because teams have only 4 random players so unless you've specifically got a skill or two to counter them they are extremely hard to take down simply because of the randomness of the team.
Try hammer warrior next time, a knocked down michael jackson can't touch you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JR-
To be absolutely blunt; the counter to Touch Rangers is to not suck at this game.

They are a build, like IWAY, which beats bad players very quickly. A good team will have absolutely no problem against them at all. They are a ridiculous gimmick. As someone stated earlier; they weed out the bad teams from RA, much like IWAY weeds out the bad teams from the early rounds of HA.

Seriously, learn to play.
This is still so true.
pork soldier is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 04:50 AM // 04:50   #88
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Guild: P4n드4k트 F0rm4710n
Profession: W/
Default

I hate people that keeps saying those who say they are overpowered are not thinking and do not know how to play the game.

Like every build, there are also counters to the Touch Ranger, but the counters to them are much less numerous than any other build. It takes alot of effort to bring one down and in non GvG situation, you won't always have the necessary skills ready or available to take them down. The problem is not that they can't be beaten, the problem is that compared to all the other builds I have seen, only the Touch Ranger can substain that amount of hate and yet still tear through whoever it is attacking.

I gave them a chance when I first saw them come into play and I perfectly realise that they are counters to them, but I have come to the conclusion that they are atleast slightly overpowered. The complete lack of available protection against Life Stealing is I think the main issue here. Kiting only delays the inevitable and asking everyone to carry a crippling skill because of 1 single build in the game is just being stupid in my opinion.

I have no problem understanding how a Touch Ranger would get obliterated in GvG, but some people like me enjoys to PvP in Fort Aspenwood for example and when a duo of two Touch Ranger completly destroys all of your NPCs and make it to the gatekeepers and manage to kill them regarless of how many enchantements you stack on them I think there is a problem. Now if only we would have had someone to cripple them, but there are such things as random parties in GW and I don't think that makes us sucky players now does it? Oh and lets not talk about what they can accomplish when backed by a monk.

Last edited by Shendaar; Jun 06, 2006 at 05:10 AM // 05:10..
Shendaar is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 04:56 AM // 04:56   #89
Zui
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Guild: The Benecia Renovatio [RenO]
Profession: Mo/
Default

For everyone still crying for a nerf(even though I'm quoting someone):

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomEngy
First off, the only place they might be overpowered is RA, so that's what I'll talk about.
Somthing being overpowered needs to be applicable to everywhere. The only places people seem to have any problem with touch rangers is RA, and ABs. Amazingly, theese have theese PvP areas have the absolute lowest skill level of all PvP areas. Hmm, is this reflective of the build being overpowered, or the players being bad? Well, if we look at mid and upper level PvP, no one has any problems with them, and laugh when they see them. This means that it's reflective of the players. Not overpowered.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomEngy
Many people like to look down on that game type but IMO it's something you have to keep in mind.
No one would look down upon Random Arena if it had compitent players that played to win. The same goes for ABs, but it's compitent teams now, which should be much easier to assemble. The same even goes for HA to a lesser extent. People are looking down upon theese forms of PvP because of the players, not because the forms of PvP are essentialy bad(ok.. HA is both).

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomEngy
And just because counters exist for something doesn't automatically mean it's fine balance-wise. A lot of otherwise balanced and fun RA builds just plain get beaten by touch rangers, and there's nothing you can do about it.
You can beat touch rangers using pure tactics alone. Useful skills that are essentialy "must have" for any team in any situation aid in this, they also aid versus any single other team there is, meaning there's no balance issue with people bringing them. RA is individual builds, not team builds, you can't have a single charactar be balanced. If you're talking about "fun RA builds" you mean builds built to own scrubs or to use some lame gimmick(such as grenths balance me/n 'spike') that only works against scrubs, using theese types of builds is part of the reason you're loosing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomEngy
Sure, you can run, but if you don't have a decent monk on your team (by no means guarunteed in RA), you're just making yourself useless for a while, then dying. Zojun's Haste and Dodge will see to that.
Ok, so you're essentialy useless, and you have 3 rangers chasing you that are also now essentialy useless. Hmm... That's more than a fair trade. Even if it's just one or two rangers, it gives your team an advantage even without a monk. It requires your other team members to be compitent to win, and is that too much to ask? They can kill whoever isin't chasing you since it's either an even match, or they have a distinct numbers advantage. After the rest of their team dies, they can focus on killing a ranger. If you die, it's called a res sig, again expecting compitence. They have speed boosts, you may have no snares, say won't kiting them make them stop for oh say 3/4 of a second every time they use a touch skill, and then make them catch back up to you again? Sounds like a decent trade to me, especaily when it's more than 1 ranger.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomEngy
To suggest every person's build should take a snare or bring e-denial is just shortsighted. Diversion might be okay but in general dom mesmers in RA just get reamed.
Well, if you're not running a sub-par build you're likely going to have something that's useful against touch rangers, a hex or condition snare, knockdown, shutdown(inturupts, diversion, blackout...), healing, somthing that causes degen. Anyone without at least one of those in a build is running a bad build, unless of course you can think of one up to par non-gimmick that's lacking one of those.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomEngy
Not to mention Cripple-based snares have a good chance of backfiring with Plauge Touch.
Ok, ranger = bow = ranged. Hey ranger being a ranged attacker... Warrior = melee. Say, hamstring+sprint or rush? Maybe even not that, ever think of running somthing like Shock for a snare?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomEngy
They are pretty boring to play, but they can make RA just un-fun by severely limiting viable builds.
Please name one of theese supposed viable builds that isin't sub-par.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomEngy
(edit) I think a good solution would be to up the recharge to 4 seconds, so it takes a little more dedication to get good DPS, rather than having 5 slots open for running/defense/condition removal.
Umm, well with the types of players touch rangers actualy beat, they could set up QZ before the match and no one would kill it, and they'd get longer run times with less run skills.

Why nerf somthing that only beats bad players using bad builds? While you're at it, nerf warriors, since they're actualy good against good teams. Seriously, there's no excuse at all anyonefor loosing to a touch ranger. None. Stop whining about them being overpowered and crying for a nerf, and perhaps ask yourself "how can I beat touch rangers?", or perhaps "what did I do wrong?", "what did my team do wrong?", and always "how can what went wrong be improved".
Zui is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 05:02 AM // 05:02   #90
Zui
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Guild: The Benecia Renovatio [RenO]
Profession: Mo/
Default

@ Sheendar

The useful skills for countering touch rangers are also useful against every single type of build you face in practicaly every situation. Shock, Gale, Blackout, Diversion, Crippling Shot, Pin Down, Deep Freeze, Ice Spikes... Get the drift? No one is asking you to take skills you normaly wouldn't take. The skills that happen to be pretty good against normal builds, happen to be truely devestating against touch ranger teams.
Zui is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 05:07 AM // 05:07   #91
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Guild: P4n드4k트 F0rm4710n
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zui
Why nerf somthing that only beats bad players using bad builds?
Thats quite a stupid comment. So according to your logic, any build that beats another player's build means that the losing player is a bad player using a bad build. Sorry, but your logic is just plain retarted. So I guess if my ele gets destroyed by anti-caster mesmer that makes me a bad player too? WTF Makes sense!

Like I said, some players like me enjoys to play in RAs and the like and that doesn't make me or anyone else a bad player. The only thing you seem to care about is GvG or anywhere else where the teams are prefefined, but I guess this is common among the so called "elite" players.
Shendaar is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 05:11 AM // 05:11   #92
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Default

I've come across a number of touch rangers in alliance battles, myself playing as monk, mesmer or assassin. I do not find them spectacularly dangerous or threatening either by themselves (1 toucher and 3 others) or 4 touchers as a group. Now certainly there's the argument that all I've seen so far were pretty bad at it but I've had much more trouble with rangers who were being rangers, i.e. with a bow or traps. People getting into serious trouble with touch rangers need to realise that having to run up to you is an obstacle to them you can use. It's about time every monk wasn't made quasi-invincible by guardian and/or protective spirit - this development is logical progression in an arms race.

Regarding numbers I maybe see toucher(s) about once in every two alliance battles but obviously even to me they're the new flavour of the 'month' build. If there's really swarms in RA then the equations change and it needs to be adjusted - a lack of variety on iway levels and everyone will get bored, even the so-called faction farmers and it's not a good thing for the future. But extreme overuse (ordinary overuse = w/mo) is the only grounds I'd consider it for adjustment.

I must admit I'm not sure what anet were thinking duplicating a skill with such short recharge already - if they were 'asking for trouble', it would seem it's arrived.

Moving off on a tangent, I love the concept of playing certain roles with primary attributes from another class. E/A dagger users, Me/E air spikers, R/W warriors, n/mo monks and so many others. It's a great idea and makes for the option for doing something unexpected or even more practical in some situations which will often get you more than doing something everyone already knows. The primary attibutes usually say something significant about the intended/anticipated purpose of the class. Some primaries are more specific than others (monk) because that's what that class does. Expertise is a great fun primary. A ranger is only the absolute first choice for a few roles, but you're not often sure what a ranger could be about to do next either and this is what expertise means. Applying it only to ranger skills makes it meaningless. It would be far worse than having a few too many unskilled r/n touchers if instead everytime you saw a ranger it was in a spike team.
nitrile is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 05:13 AM // 05:13   #93
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigTru
If it were up to me, I'd simply make it so that Expertise does not effect non-ranger skills. This would cutdown on the end-season thumper spam (OMG, I wanna get top 20 by then of the season... THUMPER TYME!!2!!!) and the RA touch rangers. Expertise would still be the single most overpowered primary attribute, but atleast it'd see SOME attention, as far as balancing goes.

Good thing I'm not a dev, huh ranger fanboys?
Since you've been condescending on your first post in this thread without even provocation from anyone else, I'm going to call you a pompous moron.

How exactly is a ranger thumper overpowered? Give us some reasons instead of some bullcrap propaganda. If you think Ranger thumpers are more damaging than warrior ones you really have no clue.

And yes it's a damn good thing you're not a dev. The game would be pure utter crap.

As for the argument that because Divine Favour doesnt affect other profession skills so Expertise should affect non ranger skills is such a dumbass argument I feel like I shouldnt have to discuss it but I will.

Divine Favour is the exception to the rule. Every other primary attribute affects other profession skills either directly or indirectly. Soul Reaping/Energy Storage for instance don't affect skills but still contribute extra energy to use those skills.

Divine Favour is the exception because if it did affect other non monk healing skills think about how overpowered it would be to be healed with DF with any attack skill or spell. Think about that and stop with the dumbass arguments.

Last edited by ChildeOfMalkav; Jun 06, 2006 at 05:23 AM // 05:23..
ChildeOfMalkav is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 05:18 AM // 05:18   #94
Forge Runner
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Default

Now that I think about it... The biggest reason why this should be nerf is for the future.

In the later chapter, there will defintely be even more "pure skill" that make ranger even more godly.

This expertise + skill thing will eventually be nerf I believe. Sooner or later.
Vermilion Okeanos is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 05:33 AM // 05:33   #95
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vermilion Okeanos
Now that I think about it... The biggest reason why this should be nerf is for the future.

In the later chapter, there will defintely be even more "pure skill" that make ranger even more godly.
Uhhh what are your sources? And how does more skills equal to overpowered? As long as you can only have 8 on your bar more "pure skill" skills doesnt mean overpowered, just more variety.

That's like saying monks should be nerfed now because in upcoming chapters they will have even more healing spells.
ChildeOfMalkav is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 05:38 AM // 05:38   #96
Krytan Explorer
 
Tark Alkerk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: In a Black Hole
Guild: less
Profession: E/
Default

gah all this talk of touch rangers being overpowered is making me sick
Tark Alkerk is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 05:44 AM // 05:44   #97
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Default

What makes me even more sick of talk of nerfing expertise just because a few idiots dont like touch rangers. Leave expertise the F--- alone.
ChildeOfMalkav is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 05:59 AM // 05:59   #98
Wilds Pathfinder
 
TwinRaven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Profession: W/
Default

I've been playing a touchie since I deleted my first ranger Twin Raven...a nice little R/E that seemed fun at the time. My "new" ranger/nec is a wee bit over nine months old and I've been snatching life away from folks since I started it. Over time I've rearranged skills until I found just the right combo. With the addition of Vampiric Bite, it's true I can snatch away an extra 15 health every 2 seconds, but it costs me an extra 3 energy...a fair trade...no more powerful than before.

Problem is...this little build of mine (not taking credit, I play my own variation though) has come under fire. I've defended it and offered strategies to beat it for weeks...here again, though is yet another thread crying nerf: the main whining coming from wariors because they stand there swinging away at air never ONCE thinking about using the survival instincts God gave an ant :RUN AWAY!!!!

SERIOUSLY: read through Gladiator and use the search...you'll find all kinds of info and strategy...QUIT whining "nerf it" You folks who can't think around a build piss me off...first my necro gets the nerf-bat, now you wanna do the same to my ranger...the only classes I play with any joy. Can't get into a group to save my life for months when the game started...I paid my freakin' dues and now someone wants to nerf it because lo and behold, what I have been doing for 3/4 of the time I've played (not including beta) is too hard for some brainless tank to counter...try putting some defensive strategy into play, this isn't whack-a-mole!

I respect the opinions of players who are willing to debate and offer insight, but dropping in " yeah make em spells...only solution" is obviously the same dipstick, follow the leader, lemming-like behavior that makes people drive SUVs as commuter cars because they want to BELONG to something...the world has enough yes-men, so please add something unique and thoughtful to the thread or STHU!

JR- You said it...don't suck and you can beat a touchie.

Nine months of playing one and I can tell you what kills em off...energy denial, diversion (not not NOT NOT NOOOOOOTTTTTT...blackout...god I HATE when people don't read the thread and chime in with what has already been mentioned as worthless)....multiple conditions and heavy degen on top of diversion and e-denial will make them drop...stay out of range....cripple and run after a knock-down...kiting help (even dumbass warriors should know when to kite...NOT whine nerf when they are to damned stupid to pull their ass outta the fire)...multiple knockdowns are hard to deal with as well.<please note: dumbass warriors are a classification of warrior...not all warriors...there IS a disticntion>

EVERY build has a counter build, even touchies. I've had my ass dropped unexpectedly and expectedly by every profession...sometimes in combinations ( a mesmer and warrior together = ouchie). A warrior can't get mad if there is a build that can kill them...a tanker should not be the ONLY build that can withstand a beating.

Touch rangers are unique, but limited and run out of energy after one victim or so (even with good gear)...after one member of your party drops, gang up on the touchie...almost always gets me at the end of my mana supply and I have to run (ESCAPE is my prefered...not storm chaser or dodge...obviously mentioned by people who don't play a touchie or play a lame one IMO). Facing more than one? CALL TARGETS and bring res sigs...drop them often enough and the team with the most res wins!!!

Pardon the rant...just play the freakin' game and LEARN to deal with the builds as they come along...remember when you were scared of air-spikers?*mocking trembles* Consider who you attack in the game...the soft targets right? As it happens, warriors are soft targets for the touchie...learn to deal with it...tankers are NOT always at the top of the foodchain...they did away with that term...it's called the food web...it's a balance.

I can think of all the times an air-spiker, interrupt ranger or mesmer killed off my necro...I didn't bitch or cry nerf once...I bit my lip, typed "gg" and rethought my build...for all you "nerf" whiners...I suggest you do the same.

Last edited by TwinRaven; Jun 06, 2006 at 06:04 AM // 06:04..
TwinRaven is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 06:07 AM // 06:07   #99
Frost Gate Guardian
 
RandomEngy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: The Kansas City Hotsteppers [KCHS]
Profession: P/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zui
For everyone still crying for a nerf(even though I'm quoting someone):

Somthing being overpowered needs to be applicable to everywhere. The only places people seem to have any problem with touch rangers is RA, and ABs. Amazingly, theese have theese PvP areas have the absolute lowest skill level of all PvP areas. Hmm, is this reflective of the build being overpowered, or the players being bad? Well, if we look at mid and upper level PvP, no one has any problems with them, and laugh when they see them. This means that it's reflective of the players. Not overpowered.
RA is fundamentally different from other gametypes because you can't pick your teammates. Everywhere else you can make a team that can deal with touch rangers (boon prot, snares, whatever), but in RA you just kind of have to guess. It's certainly not ideal for everyone to bring anti-toucher all the time because it does limit your build. For instance when playing as a toucher I have yet to meet a warrior who could beat me. Many used knockdowns and snares. But without monk support, they still died. Does this mean we should all stop running warriors in RA, because warriors don't counter them in any way? Boon Prots are great against everything... but obviously it's not ideal for everyone to bring them. Again it all comes down to not being able to construct a team.

Quote:
No one would look down upon Random Arena if it had compitent players that played to win. The same goes for ABs, but it's compitent teams now, which should be much easier to assemble. The same even goes for HA to a lesser extent. People are looking down upon theese forms of PvP because of the players, not because the forms of PvP are essentialy bad(ok.. HA is both).
Probably. But it has no bearing on the discussion at hand.

Quote:
You can beat touch rangers using pure tactics alone. Useful skills that are essentialy "must have" for any team in any situation aid in this, they also aid versus any single other team there is, meaning there's no balance issue with people bringing them. RA is individual builds, not team builds, you can't have a single charactar be balanced. If you're talking about "fun RA builds" you mean builds built to own scrubs or to use some lame gimmick(such as grenths balance me/n 'spike') that only works against scrubs, using theese types of builds is part of the reason you're loosing.
Again, any type of warrior will lose to a touch ranger, especially one who brings WD. They last longer if they bring heal sig but that's just delaying the inevitable. Maybe you think all warriors are "scrub builds" but really that's not the case.

Quote:
Ok, so you're essentialy useless, and you have 3 rangers chasing you that are also now essentialy useless. Hmm... That's more than a fair trade. Even if it's just one or two rangers, it gives your team an advantage even without a monk. It requires your other team members to be compitent to win, and is that too much to ask? They can kill whoever isin't chasing you since it's either an even match, or they have a distinct numbers advantage. After the rest of their team dies, they can focus on killing a ranger. If you die, it's called a res sig, again expecting compitence. They have speed boosts, you may have no snares, say won't kiting them make them stop for oh say 3/4 of a second every time they use a touch skill, and then make them catch back up to you again? Sounds like a decent trade to me, especaily when it's more than 1 ranger.
Who says they'll be multiple people chasing? If there's already a teammate going after a kiter I just pick someone different. And in a 1 on 1 chase you'll be keeping yourself healed and doing constant damage to the kiter, keeping him out of the battle until he's dead a while later.

Quote:
Well, if you're not running a sub-par build you're likely going to have something that's useful against touch rangers, a hex or condition snare, knockdown, shutdown(inturupts, diversion, blackout...), healing, somthing that causes degen. Anyone without at least one of those in a build is running a bad build, unless of course you can think of one up to par non-gimmick that's lacking one of those.
We covered the warriors already... but let's move on. Anti-warrior/degen necros can do quite well in RA. Siphon, Faintheartedness, Signet of Midnight, Plauge touch is a favorite of mine. And it does quite well in a format where you can't guaruntee condition removal. It can be decent against casters too, if you just pile on the degen. But against touch rangers it falls flat. They heal fast enough to overcome even heavy degen and they ignore Enfeeble, Faintheartedness and basically everything in the curses line. This character, otherwise quite well equipped to handle a battle can't do anything against touch rangers. And someone mentioned Spiteful Spirit as a counter, but it really isn't as long as you keep away from your teammates. It heals for twice the damage each time you Bite or Touch and you're still doing full damage.

Next build... how about a mesmer this time? Distortion, Migrane, Conjure Phantasm, Power Drain, Drain Enchantment, Spirit of Failure, Ether Feast can do quite well. It's quite hardy against Warriors/Rangers/Assassins, had good energy management, can really annoy casters and has decent degen. A fun build, again killed by touch rangers. Even though you're specced Illusion you can't really fit in a good snare without compromosing the build, through slots or energy management.

Same deal for Ineptitude/Clumsiness mesmers.

Blinding Flash eles can disable most physical damage dealers and do good damage to casters, not the case with touchers.

If you're not running AoD on your assassin, you're similarly screwed.

Quote:
Ok, ranger = bow = ranged. Hey ranger being a ranged attacker... Warrior = melee. Say, hamstring+sprint or rush? Maybe even not that, ever think of running somthing like Shock for a snare?
In most cases you can find someone close by to dump the snare on, even if the ranger is far away. Warriors: no, I'm sorry, shock will not help. They'll be on the ground for a bit then get up and touch back to full. If you sprint away you'll be useless to your team... so you start attacking someone else and the touch ranger follows, killing you quickly. And I'm sorry but if you don't bring Plauge Touch as a warrior in RA you're going to be very weak, very crippled and very blind a whole lot.

Quote:
Please name one of theese supposed viable builds that isin't sub-par.
I went over this earlier in the post.

Quote:
Umm, well with the types of players touch rangers actualy beat, they could set up QZ before the match and no one would kill it, and they'd get longer run times with less run skills.
Why are you even talking about QZ? If it's not killed instantly there's a good chance your team will hate you for it.

Quote:
Why nerf somthing that only beats bad players using bad builds? While you're at it, nerf warriors, since they're actualy good against good teams. Seriously, there's no excuse at all anyonefor loosing to a touch ranger. None. Stop whining about them being overpowered and crying for a nerf, and perhaps ask yourself "how can I beat touch rangers?", or perhaps "what did I do wrong?", "what did my team do wrong?", and always "how can what went wrong be improved".
I do know how to beat them. The problem isn't that I can't beat them, it's that doing so makes the game far less interesting. This is indicative of an unbalance, something if removed will make the game more fun. This is the case with every skill that was ever nerfed. You can always list counters for it, but that doesn't magically mean the skill is perfectly balanced.
RandomEngy is offline  
Old Jun 06, 2006, 06:38 AM // 06:38   #100
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Default

I've played as a touch ranger
I've been killed by touch rangers
and have killed plenty touch rangers

true there have been more TR's in RA which is why i've been playing cripshot

I feel they are pretty balanced as they have to touch, and If u use one of the many counters listed throughout this thread they can be rendard useless. They are just one of the many FOTM builds that flood random arena ever so often. If u can't hit a prot boon, take non aviodable attacks, if u keep getting knocked down take balanced stance, if u are continuosly hit with conditions, take pure condtions, etc.. A key factor of guild wars is learning and adapting to builds.

Frankly I think its a creative build that simply uses high expertise to lower energy cost of skills, which follows the ways of thumpers, r/a's and i supose trappers. Slaming on this build would be the same as slaming on those listed above and Mes/eles with fast casting (insert element).

nerfing Expertise is not a vialbe solution and will unbalance the game limiting uses of rangers. If there were a nerf, a simple 1-2 second added recharge time would suffice, or we would see a change to sacrifce touches.

just my 2 cents.

Last edited by original whopper; Jun 06, 2006 at 06:01 PM // 18:01..
original whopper is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:18 PM // 19:18.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("