Curse

Teh [prefession]-zorz · May 18, 2007, 12:30 AM // 00:30

if that happened to my ranger, id uninstall...

.Unanimous. · May 26, 2007, 03:41 PM // 15:41

in order to even out the classes with this they'd need to charge paras for spears and also make all toher classes weapons break so they had to buy new ones every now and then, for fairness.

Bloodied Blade · Jun 02, 2007, 10:34 PM // 22:34

While we're at it, let's give monks talent trees, underpower their healing, and give them a "shadow" tree that restores energy...and warriors can get a skill called "Mortal Strike" that cripples healing, and...wait, that's WoW.

In short- no, limiting the number of arrows would destroy what is great about the ranger in this game.

GoddessOfMetal · Jun 08, 2007, 11:49 AM // 11:49

I've played other games in which archer type characters had to buy arrows. It was tedious and basically made me frustrated because not only did I have to keep replenishing my supply of arrows but, it also counted as weight that I had to carry around (which would be horrible for my small in stature ranger).

The reason I fell in love with GW is because I wasn't limited in playing my ranger by worrying about if I had enough gold to obtain my arrows or if she would be able to carry the weight of them.
In summary- Don't fix anything that isn't broken.

bilateralrope · Jun 08, 2007, 01:05 PM // 13:05

I agree with what everyone has said about having an arrow count that needs restocking, its a gold sink that we don't really need.

However having the game count the number of arrows your character has fired could prove interesting. Especially if there is a title involved.

JonnyWarhawk · Jun 11, 2007, 01:42 AM // 01:42

It would be unfair. This is one of the first games to not make archers pay for arrows... what a concept huh?

Nyagan · Jun 14, 2007, 05:39 PM // 17:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by CherubimSlayer187

I personally think that if special arrows were made into an off hand it would be interesting and fun. Such as instead of having fiery bow strings, why not make fiery arrows and etc for other things. It would have to be tweaked of course so things wouldn't get over powered but it seems like a legitimate idea to me. And of course the fact that these off hand arrows would have to have a cool look to them

Good idea! Thats how it should be set up. But then there might be too many mods??? Lol, never too many mods, no such thing!keep the good ideas coiming!

ArKaiN · Jun 14, 2007, 10:55 PM // 22:55

Yeah, also make an NPC that you could pay one plat and someone comes over to your house and kicks you several times really hard on the nuts. Both great ideas.

Rayvin Aerow · Jun 17, 2007, 03:07 AM // 03:07

***Somewhere in the Forest of FoW***

Rayvin Aerow R/Mo20 "Oh Crap,Uh oh!"

Group Leader W/Mo20 "What's wrong?"

Rayvin Aerow R/Mo20 "I'm out of arrows =("

Group Leader W/Mo20 "..."

Rayvin Aerow R/Mo20 "I'm wielding an Ogre Slaying Knife!"

Group Leader W/Mo20 "..."

JBeulke · Jun 19, 2007, 02:12 PM // 14:12

Another thing about having limited arrows...what group in their right mind would ever want a party member with only a limited amount of ammo? With limited arrows, rangers would be pointless.

Risa · Jun 19, 2007, 09:29 PM // 21:29

Well, it'd make rangers the most expensive class, I can't imagine getting a ranger out of pre with arrows needing to be purchased...

However, if the arrows didn't need to be purchased, I agree with a previous poster that making arrows offhand items could be pretty interesting. Though, it might make using preparations seem a bit..odd.

XvArchonvX · Jun 19, 2007, 09:42 PM // 21:42

If you think it would be bad for rangers, imagine what it would be like for Paragons.

"WTB 200 Darksongs!"

Yarrick · Jun 19, 2007, 11:26 PM // 23:26

/not signed on the limited arrows thingy

/signed on the unique arrows thingy, more mods, more stuff, more more everything weeeeeeeeee

Kas · Jun 19, 2007, 11:40 PM // 23:40

It is a bad idea. Not bashing your try to get it into GW but it is a bad idea in general. Same as it is with needing ingredients to cast your spells (like certain roots, herbs etc) or having to repair your armor and weapons. Same as with having to take care of food and water.
Most people that are pro consumables argument with logic (the next time someone brings up logic in a fantasy game the world is gonna go bluescreen of death). For some reason carrying thousands and thousands of Arrows, weighting 2000 pounds is more logical to them than carrying unlimited arrows. Yes, beats me too.

Lourens · Jun 20, 2007, 06:34 AM // 06:34

What about having a warrior need to buy another axe head (5k)
and Arrows cost 10g a piece? thats 5000 Oo
And Spears need to buy a new spear head etc