Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > The Campfire

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 22, 2007, 06:26 AM // 06:26   #1
Forge Runner
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: ALOA
Profession: E/Me
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default Fireball or liquid flame?

[skill]Liquid Flame[/skill] [skill]Fireball[/skill]

Liquid Flame casts in 1 second as opposed to 2, hits nearby foes as opposed to adjacent, but that extra hitting of nearby foes is conditional. It also has double the recharge time.

I've always used Fireball, but it seems like almost every Fire Ele I play with uses Liquid Flame
The Great Al is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2007, 06:31 AM // 06:31   #2
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Guild: Ceasers X I Legion
Profession: W/Mo
Default

I use both
No problems then
madman24749 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2007, 06:37 AM // 06:37   #3
Forge Runner
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Guild: ALOA
Profession: E/Me
Default

Not really what I was expecting...

my skillbar is usually

GoLE
Glowing Gaze
Fireball
Meteor Shower
Fire Attunement
Searing Flames
Res
LB Gaze when necessary..when not, I've started to bring Serpent's Quickness...either that, or Mark of Rodgort
The Great Al is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2007, 09:35 AM // 09:35   #4
Forge Runner
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Default

I would and do take Serpent's Quickness over either of them, unless skill-capping or otherwise constrained as to my choice of secondary profession. It's probably better for the sheer AoE damage alone, AND it also accelerates energy management.

When I also have room for one of Fireball/Liquid Flame -- which is actually pretty common, as I play mainly just with AIs or else my wife and AIs, and hence don't always have to bring rez -- I favored Fireball for a while, but have switched back to Liquid Flame. And Lightbringer's Gaze IS better than either of them, where applicable.

Basically, unless Searing Flames is going to get disabled a lot, the 2-second cast of Fireball gets in the way of maximizing your SF hits. And if you're in a zone where disabling is that bad, you probably want the faster-casting Liquid Flame anyway.
Francis Crawford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2007, 09:53 AM // 09:53   #5
Just Plain Fluffy
 
Ensign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Guild: Idiot Savants
Default

How spammy is your bar without that skill slot? Lots of time = Fireball, not a lot of time = Liquid Flame.

Peace,
-CxE
__________________
Don't argue with idiots. They bring you to their level and beat you with experience.
Ensign is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2007, 05:12 PM // 17:12   #6
Forge Runner
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ensign
How spammy is your bar without that skill slot? Lots of time = Fireball, not a lot of time = Liquid Flame.

Peace,
-CxE
He showed us his skill bar in his second post. It was SF. Ergo, not a lot of time.
Francis Crawford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22, 2007, 09:40 PM // 21:40   #7
Jungle Guide
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Guild: Lotus Branca[Lbr]
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

I like liquid because it's not a projectile. I do use both, though,
ArKaiN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24, 2007, 06:58 PM // 18:58   #8
Ascalonian Squire
 
poobert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Inkland
Profession: R/
Default

I dislike projectiles, hence liquid flame. It is better against running enemies because it cant miss, and when people are standing still they are usually attacking or casting, so it does aoe. A 1 second cast is a hell of alot harder to interupt than 2 seconds and finally spamming skills are boring (they might be effective but still.... boring).
poobert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25, 2007, 12:56 AM // 00:56   #9
Furnace Stoker
 
bhavv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Default

Liquid flame is far better as it isnt a projectile and always does its damage. If used allong side searing flames, the recharge on LF doesnt really matter much as you can just spam SF while it recharges.
bhavv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25, 2007, 04:03 PM // 16:03   #10
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Profession: E/
Default

Depending on build I'll either use Fireball or both.

Reasons are because Fireball is non-conditional, and has half the recharge time. Being a projectile screws it in some cases, but that's rarely a problem (almost any build you use neither LF or FB will be your primary skills).

My usual SF build looks like the following:

Searing Flames
Fireball
Glowing Glaze
Glyph of Lesser Energy
Mark of Rodgort
Meteor Shower
Fire Attunement
rez or Glyph of Sacrifice (I hate 5 second MS casts)

alternatively, I'll run the same minus MS and throw Liquid Flame in there. Lots of spamming, lots of damage, good energy management.
Kristyl Meth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25, 2007, 07:08 PM // 19:08   #11
Furnace Stoker
 
Dr Strangelove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wasting away again in Margaritaville
Guild: [HOTR]
Default

In a searing flames build, liquid flame is better as you can squeeze it in between casts of SF without disrupting your tempo.

Almost everywhere else, fireball is better from the lower recharge and unconditional AoE.
Dr Strangelove is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19 PM // 16:19.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("