Dec 28, 2006, 02:15 AM // 02:15
|
#1
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Irvine,Southern California
Guild: Bretheren Of Chaos[Dark]
Profession: W/
|
Mind Burn Vs. Searing Flames-Which is Better?
As explained in the title, I want to know which of these are better. Both PvE and PvP. And if possible, post the cons and pros of the two skills. Then give your opinion on which of these skills are better to use.
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006, 02:20 AM // 02:20
|
#2
|
Jungle Guide
|
Searing flames is better. The end. No need to post pros and cons.
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006, 03:25 AM // 03:25
|
#3
|
Banned
|
There is no comparison. Searing Flames just owns Mind Burn. Thread over.
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006, 05:38 AM // 05:38
|
#4
|
Forge Runner
|
Mind Burn might not be worth taking if it were a non-elite.
|
|
|
Dec 28, 2006, 06:31 AM // 06:31
|
#5
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Jul 2005
Guild: ******************* Refuge From Exile [RFE]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis Crawford
Mind Burn might not be worth taking if it were a non-elite.
|
He does raise an interesting point.
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2006, 08:51 AM // 08:51
|
#6
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Guild: LOVE
Profession: Me/E
|
Well, like the others pointed out, SF is obviously way better than Mind Burn.
However...
If you take all the bad stuff (exhaustion and recharge time) away from Mind Burn...you get MIND BLAST! Yes, this new Nightfall spell (capped from Exuro Flatus) may actually be better than SF/GG combined. In addition, it gives valuable information about the enemy's energy level and you can use it to your advantage. Knowledge is power!
Imagine a fire elementalist (with enough points in energy storage) spamming this on other professions...energy management would never be a problem.
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2006, 09:14 AM // 09:14
|
#7
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: US
Profession: R/Mo
|
Mind Blast is basically a free Flare, but if you're using it to deal damage, you get owned by high AL and are spending 100% of your time to punch out damage that isn't any higher than an autoattacking warrior. No disruption, no snaring, just... Flare.
SF has both beat by a pretty good margin.
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2006, 09:40 AM // 09:40
|
#8
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Guild: LOVE
Profession: Me/E
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seef II
Mind Blast is basically a free Flare, but if you're using it to deal damage, you get owned by high AL and are spending 100% of your time to punch out damage that isn't any higher than an autoattacking warrior. No disruption, no snaring, just... Flare.
SF has both beat by a pretty good margin.
|
However, SF is rarely used alone all by itself, as otherwise, energy management problems would occur unless Glowing Gaze (GG) is used. SF alone is not a spammable spell.
Against a single target, if you add up the total cost of 2XSF followed by 1X GG and deduct the energy gained during the 9 seconds of execution, and perform the same for 4xMind Blast during the same period:
At LVL16 fire:
SF/GG Combo: 290 damage + burning (additional 126) = 416, 35 energy cost - 10 energy gain = 25 net energy loss
MB: 250 damage, 20 energy cost - 40 energy gain = 20 net energy gain.
Would you rather damage foes quickly with SF/GG and eventually run out of energy or think about the making the battle a test of endurance?
The quick and powerful energy renewal from MB makes it a formidable management skill that can be used to power more aggressive fire spells or relegated for secondary professions.
P.S. SF/GG becomes even more effective with Glyph of Lesser Energy, but then again, this could be used for other purposes in a Mind Blast build as well.
Last edited by mage767; Dec 31, 2006 at 09:42 AM // 09:42..
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2006, 06:23 PM // 18:23
|
#9
|
Forge Runner
|
I'd rather use SF/GG and not run out of energy, thank you very much.
Unless enchantment stripping is so bad that I can't keep Fire Attunement up:
2 SFs cost 20 net energy
1 GG returns 7 net energy
8 energy regens in the 6 seconds it takes to do all that (HSR and SQ aside).
Net loss of 5 energy in 8 seconds -- that's completely covered by GoLE, which is around 50 energy/minute.
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2006, 07:03 PM // 19:03
|
#10
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Irvine,Southern California
Guild: Bretheren Of Chaos[Dark]
Profession: W/
|
But lets say, your enemy is immune to conditions(Avatar of Melandru for ie), Mind Burn would do much more dmg then Sf, since Sf only does its dmg if your foe is on fire.
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2006, 07:15 PM // 19:15
|
#11
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Georgia, US
|
-can't wait for the nerf bat on SF and something with E/D Earth build-
But yeah, SF owns hands down.
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2006, 08:37 PM // 20:37
|
#13
|
Forge Runner
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangers Rock
But lets say, your enemy is immune to conditions(Avatar of Melandru for ie), Mind Burn would do much more dmg then Sf, since Sf only does its dmg if your foe is on fire.
|
Do you have any other examples in mind?
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2006, 09:31 PM // 21:31
|
#14
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wasting away again in Margaritaville
Guild: [HOTR]
|
Exhaustion makes mind burn totally worthless, nuff said.
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2006, 09:34 PM // 21:34
|
#15
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Guild: Lievs Death Squad [LDS]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangers Rock
But lets say, your enemy is immune to conditions(Avatar of Melandru for ie), Mind Burn would do much more dmg then Sf, since Sf only does its dmg if your foe is on fire.
|
And Mind Burn just isn't worth using. Hell its only useful if you have more energy than them. And it causes exhaustion and is nothing overly special. You need lots more fire skills to do any real damage which brings your energy down lower.
|
|
|
Dec 31, 2006, 09:40 PM // 21:40
|
#16
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the 7th level of HELL! J/K Somewhere in GW assassinating things
Guild: [acid]members of the KAWS alliance
Profession: A/
|
Mind Burn isn't a complete loss, when combined with a couple other skills to use with it that are fast casts(not flare -.-) then the exhaustion doesn't work to well and you have an excellent single target pressure and spike if done correctly.
|
|
|
Jan 01, 2007, 01:01 AM // 01:01
|
#17
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Irvine,Southern California
Guild: Bretheren Of Chaos[Dark]
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Francis Crawford
Do you have any other examples in mind?
|
Frigid armor is another one... Still, if they are immune to burning, it is better to bring Mind Burn, since you do will almost always do both damage. The burning effect will not work if they are immune to conditions.
|
|
|
Jan 01, 2007, 02:36 AM // 02:36
|
#18
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Guild: Lievs Death Squad [LDS]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rangers Rock
Frigid armor is another one... Still, if they are immune to burning, it is better to bring Mind Burn, since you do will almost always do both damage. The burning effect will not work if they are immune to conditions.
|
If they were immune to burning i wouldn't be wasting Exhaustion on doing something i could just as easily with a Fireball.
|
|
|
Jan 01, 2007, 02:47 AM // 02:47
|
#19
|
(屮ಠ益ಠ)屮
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Guild: Guildless
Profession: Mo/
|
It isn't about Mind Burn costing wayyyy less than Searing Flames, it's about Searing Flames being able to output more damage.
__________________
|
|
|
Jan 01, 2007, 06:17 AM // 06:17
|
#20
|
Jungle Guide
|
Mind burn is bad because almost half the damage is through a long duration burn, which is a) easily removed, and b) doesn't really fit the frontloaded damage niche the spell is supposed to serve.
Frankly, I think exhaustion needs to be removed. Given that the extra damage and burning is conditional the skill is hardly overpowered even if you could spam it.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 AM // 04:06.
|