Apr 06, 2005, 03:34 AM // 03:34
|
#1
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago
Guild: Storm Haven
Profession: N/
|
When is a Warrior Secondary a Bad Idea?
Because I've been shown the light about having a Monk Primary/Warrior Secondary, but I just don't think that an Elementalist/Warrior could ever work. With my limited knowledge of melee classes the only benefits I could see for having a warrior secondary would be the stances and the endure pain and whatnot. Maybe if you're a funny monk you give your team a speed-boost with Charge!.
So when is the warrior secondary applicable and when does it completely fail?
|
|
|
Apr 06, 2005, 03:40 AM // 03:40
|
#2
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SoCal
Profession: E/
|
really depends on your build.
warrior secondary has 2 benifits.
1) to have a weapon mastery if you want to use a weapon.
2) to have stances/shouts from tatics.
if neither of those are your goal, pick a different 2ndary.
|
|
|
Apr 06, 2005, 03:52 AM // 03:52
|
#3
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Passed out on my Keyboard from lack of sleep from playing GW too much
Guild: The Harpers
Profession: R/Mo
|
I don't think a Me/W would do well IMO
Ren
|
|
|
Apr 06, 2005, 04:02 AM // 04:02
|
#4
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Feb 2005
Profession: Me/E
|
A very good build using warrior secondary is the Illusionary Weaponry mesmer/warrior. In fact, it was probably too good before they made 100 blades elite.
*Added*: I just remembered some r/w builds that mainly use warrior skills but had ranger as the primary class to take advantage of expertise. IIRC there is a build written by Saus that was r/w and uses Flourish.
Last edited by mostro; Apr 06, 2005 at 04:12 AM // 04:12..
|
|
|
Apr 06, 2005, 04:05 AM // 04:05
|
#5
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SoCal
Profession: E/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostro
A very good build using warrior secondary is the Illusionary Weaponry mesmer/warrior. In fact, it was probably too good before they made 100 blades elite.
|
ya hundred blades going elite really messed up the whole idea behind IW
now all you have is cyclone axe, but that only hits once.
|
|
|
Apr 06, 2005, 04:52 AM // 04:52
|
#6
|
Banned
|
Me/W with Flurry still does good damage, not as good as 100 blades, but it's still decent. You could theoretically play warrior secondary with any class, some alphas swear by N/W who some of my guildies play Mo/W and R/W. The only one I don't see much of is E/W, and I don't know why.
|
|
|
Apr 06, 2005, 06:07 PM // 18:07
|
#7
|
Academy Page
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostro
A very good build using warrior secondary is the Illusionary Weaponry mesmer/warrior. In fact, it was probably too good before they made 100 blades elite.
*Added*: I just remembered some r/w builds that mainly use warrior skills but had ranger as the primary class to take advantage of expertise. IIRC there is a build written by Saus that was r/w and uses Flourish.
|
The premade berserker was R/W, and was MEAN. Fast, furious, dodging, healing.
R/W is also posted with a great Flourish build on this web I think. Expertise cuts the 5 mana cost of the skills to say 3? and gain is 5 each, and instant recycle. Dunno who posted it, I asked and he said he did like 1 SKILL every SECOND. Can you believe it? (more skills were made 5 energy last month, before that Flourish was hard to make worthwhile).
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:37 PM // 20:37.
|