Curse

HigherMinion · Dec 08, 2011, 06:46 PM // 18:46

Halp numbers!

I am *pretty* certain that a quick-activating dagger chain (JS-FF-DB) will cause more damage WITHOUT Golden Fang Strike; at least, potentially.

If anyone can make more accurate numbers; I compared the fact that JS+FF with both trigger in the same second that GFS triggers. I am also positive Exhausting Assault would be a better secondary attack to slot, as it's also a 1/2 activating AND a dual. Making it lolfast trigger for your buffs.

I was running under the assumption you would be under [email protected], [email protected] and the foe has cracked armour. It is quite usual for an assassin player to build a team like this (or 10 smiting if hybrid Orders).

To clarify, my question is this:
Is taking Golden Fang Strike better than using Jagged Strike for a second time, or Exhausting Assault?
If I'm wrong, do let me know.

Kendil · Dec 08, 2011, 07:05 PM // 19:05

If your looking at pure dps then I suggest you try it out yourself on the master of damage.

I'm not a numbers expert, so I can't help you if you look for more variables than simple dps to 1 enemy.

Toraen · Dec 08, 2011, 07:42 PM // 19:42

MoD doesn't factor Deep Wound so he'd be useless here.

HigherMinion · Dec 08, 2011, 07:47 PM // 19:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toraen

MoD doesn't factor Deep Wound so he'd be useless here.

^That, and it's not DPS I'm after. At least, not exactly. In the same second it takes to use GFS, you can use two quick-attacks faster for more damage from buffs.

ultimak719 · Dec 08, 2011, 08:32 PM // 20:32

The MoD does give how long it took until death, in seconds, and I believe that takes into account deep wound. So you could try that.

Anaraky · Dec 08, 2011, 09:19 PM // 21:19

Correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK Deep Wound damage caps at 100. Assuming that is the case.

Golden Fang Strikes damage(z) is: buffs + baseDMG + 100

Jagged Strikes damage is: buffs + baseDMG
Exhausting Assaults damage is: buffs*2 + baseDMG*2
Fox Fangs damage is: buffs + baseDMG + X

However, as you pointed out, GFS has a longer activation time. If we assume it takes twice as long to recharge we can use one of three combos in the time GFS takes to cast.

#1: JS + JS
#2: JS + FF
#3: JS + EA

#1's damage(y1): buffs*2 + baseDMG*2
#2's damage(y2): buffs*2 + baseDMG*2 + X
#3's damage(y3): buffs*3 + baseDMG*3

Looking at the above, whenever y1/2/3 exceeds z they are superior.

Assuming 13 dagger mastery, 16 SoH, 16 OoP. X = 32, buffs = (26 + 17).

y1 = 86 + baseDMG*2
y2 = 118 + baseDMG*2
y3 = 129 + baseDMG*3
z = 143 + baseDMG

When baseDMG ≥ 57, y1 is better then z.
When baseDMG ≥ 25, y2 is better then z.
When baseDMG ≥ 7, y3 is better then z.

baseDMG = the damage a single unbuffed hit does, on Cracked Armor.

Anyway, hope that answers your question.

Edit: Didn't account for baseDMG.

Reformed · Dec 08, 2011, 09:20 PM // 21:20

Really depends on whether or not the target lives past the second chain. In either scenario you will be cycling JS-FF-DB every other chain anyways due to recharges.

Toraen · Dec 08, 2011, 10:29 PM // 22:29

From that, it seems JS+JS doesn't exceed GFS (even with CA, dagger base damage won't be 57 or more in HM, probably not even in NM), and JS+FF doesn't really matter because the point of GFS is to use it during FF's recharge. EA is clearly better, but at 8r it won't be available during as many "FF still recharging" moments. GFS also can lead straight into another DB, which none of the other combos do (might not matter, but I don't know exactly how the attack speeds vs. recharges would play out).

HigherMinion · Dec 08, 2011, 10:40 PM // 22:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toraen

From that, it seems JS+JS doesn't exceed GFS (even with CA, dagger base damage won't be 57 or more in HM, probably not even in NM), and JS+FF doesn't really matter because the point of GFS is to use it during FF's recharge. EA is clearly better, but at 8r it won't be available during as many "FF still recharging" moments. GFS also can lead straight into another DB, which none of the other combos do (might not matter, but I don't know exactly how the attack speeds vs. recharges would play out).

EA is also a nice utility rupt. Imo if you want Deep Wound, it's not hard to slot it in your heroes. A paragon or illusion mesmer.

What this does show is chaining Jagged-EA-Jagged-FF-db, repeat. Is more damage than Jagged-GFS-DB-Jagged-FF-DB and faster.

Anaraky · Dec 08, 2011, 11:39 PM // 23:39

JS = baseDMG + buffs
EA = baseDMG*2 + buffs*2
FF = baseDMG + buffs + X
GFS = baseDMG + buffs + DW
DB = baseDMG*2 + buffs*2 + Y*N

JS-EA-JS-FF-DB = baseDMG*7 + buffs*7 + X + Y*N

JS-GFS-DB-JS-FF-DB = baseDMG*8 + buffs*8 + X + (Y*N)*2 + DW

As you can see, the second one does somewhat higher damage even if we don't include Deep Wound. The thing is though that the second one takes 4.5s to finish, if we assume DB and GFS takes exactly one second and the rest take exactly half a second to activate, while the first one takes 3s. Keep in mind that EA has a fairly long cooldown and thus the first combo isn't really repeatable without modification, while the second one is almost completely repeatable (1s lag, assuming perfect timing) and does more total damage.

Edit: Fixed some errors.

ErrantVenture · Dec 08, 2011, 11:59 PM // 23:59

Deepwound is used as much for the healing reduction as the max health reduction it causes. Over the entire duration of the enchantment it will either negate enough healing to be more worthwhile than another fast-dagger-attack or will force the enemy into expending energy to move it.

If you're a physical class with access to DW, you should ALWAYS bring it.

Anaraky · Dec 09, 2011, 12:11 AM // 00:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by ErrantVenture

Deepwound is used as much for the healing reduction as the max health reduction it causes. Over the entire duration of the enchantment it will either negate enough healing to be more worthwhile than another fast-dagger-attack or will force the enemy into expending energy to move it.

If you're a physical class with access to DW, you should ALWAYS bring it.

That's debatable. If this were regarding PvP I would agree but in PvE the healing-reduction part of Deep Wound is a marginal advantage at best, at least the way I usually play the game. I tend to have enough AoE-burst/pressure that no amount of healing is going to save the enemy anyway, thus negating the use of Deep Wound as a pressure tool. Especially if we consider that the foe is likely to die within a few seconds at most after the Deep Wound has been applied.

Lukyboy · Dec 09, 2011, 10:38 AM // 10:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anaraky

JS-GFS-DB-FF-DB = baseDMG*7 + buffs*7 + X + (Y*N)*2 + DW

I think you forgot a JS

JS-GFS-DB-JS-FF-DB = baseDMG*8 + buffs*8 + X + (Y*N)*2 + DW

and it now also takes half a second longer then you originally stated, which, if I understand you correctly, would actually benefit its repeatability

Anaraky · Dec 09, 2011, 07:30 PM // 19:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lukyboy

I think you forgot a JS

JS-GFS-DB-JS-FF-DB = baseDMG*8 + buffs*8 + X + (Y*N)*2 + DW

and it now also takes half a second longer then you originally stated, which, if I understand you correctly, would actually benefit its repeatability

You are correct, that will teach me not to do math before breakfast.

Coast · Dec 09, 2011, 08:06 PM // 20:06

take deep wound, especially with the hm update coming later

HigherMinion · Dec 10, 2011, 10:58 AM // 10:58

Well, base damage will be a bit higher, so that puts even more favour in EA's court. I think, if you want a secondary attack it should be for utility; Brawling for KD or EA for rupt. The application of the maths may be largely irrelevant, unfortunately...