Curse

pappayaponta · Apr 24, 2006, 04:49 PM // 16:49

So, I've decided to do a little list of what the community wants for guild changes. This is regarding everything to alliences, guild hall and privilegies.

I'll start with a basic list and then update it once a day depending on what you guys want. So let's start off.(Remember if you dont agree with any point, please let me know!)

-Make the guild hall more comfortable to be in, maybe a living room or a bar?

-Balance the town control/elite missions.

-Give the leader the ability to choose names at the ranks and decide how many ranks there should be. Not only leader, officer and member.

-Add storage, merchant etc. in the guild hall. (*Will be in GW:F)

-More Guild Halls!

-No invitation Fee!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please feel free to post your suggestions!

Lexar · Apr 24, 2006, 04:53 PM // 16:53

I think the community wants some sort of Hair stylist, a better Trade system, PvE rewards to rival PvP rank (which we're getting now), 1 vs 1 (also getting), two handed swords and axes, mounts like horses, towns clothing or jewelry, more high end dungeons, and possibly an end to bots (for which a hard nerf of a few critical invincimonk skills would in my opinion outweigh the possible balance issues in pvp if it means ending the bot thing).

Kool Pajamas · Apr 24, 2006, 04:54 PM // 16:54

The invitation fee is to prevent people from spamming invites. I guess if you are pvp only it sucks to have to have money but people felt it was needed.

GW:F will have more guild halls.

More additions to guild halls are always nice.

I dont know how we can balance town/control when we havent even seen exactly how it will go. Factions isnt even out yet. The preview was too short to know how its going to go.

Giving more and new ranks for guilds would be good. Along with customizing what privilages each rank has.

actionjack · Apr 24, 2006, 07:19 PM // 19:19

This one is about auction house (since there are already countless thread about it, so I won't start another one...)

But what is the reason that A.net never did add a Auction house? I am well sure in development, they are very much aware of such features, but it was never made into the game, Why?

I hold my theory to that the Dev think such feature would make the game "too easy". With frictionless trade and transaction, it would break down the price (where most things will just be a little above what the merchant will pay), thus making people have lower incentive to "farm", which might result in more people not staying.

If so, a "Universal Auction house" might not be such good idea (else it might be added by now) Thus I would suggest a altnerative of not a acution house, but a Better Trade Channel/Menu. It would be where you can put some of you goods (1 ... to possibly 5) up in a menu, where other can just look at such menu for easier finding what they need. BUT.. it would be kept in Districts... so you can only see what ever is sell in districts, and can only kept your item on sell if you remain in the district. (and everything will be charge with a fee) Yes, it add on lots frictions, but might be another alternative for such thing.

Vilaptca · Apr 24, 2006, 09:16 PM // 21:16

If you were guildless before the addition of invitation fees, then you'll know why it was added.

It became annoying just to even enter a town. "Hi I see your guildless, I've sent you a guild invite, please join." Most of the time though, you'd just get the invite and have no idea where it came from or who they are.

It was a necessary addition.

TheLordOfBlah · Apr 25, 2006, 03:20 AM // 03:20

You will be able to visit other guild's halls that are within your alliance.

bilateralrope · Apr 25, 2006, 04:58 AM // 04:58

Removing the guest invite fee might be useful, but the member invite fee should stay.

Mandy Memory · Apr 25, 2006, 05:20 AM // 05:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by pappayaponta

-Balance the town control/elite missions.

-Give the leader the ability to choose names at the ranks and decide how many ranks there should be. Not only leader, officer and member.

-No invitation Fee!

I disagree with these. And I havent seen "community suggestions" of any of these.

The town control was fairly balanced in fpe...and I am sure it will be greatly improved upon release. I dont agree that every little guild with 2 members should have an equal shot at owning a city.

There is nothing wrong with leader officer and member...I dont even know what you would add or what they would do besides invite members.

The invitation fee is so small that it doesnt really matter, but it keeps people from spam recruiting in LA...Therefore its amazing.

pappayaponta · Apr 25, 2006, 05:24 AM // 05:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lexar

I think the community wants some sort of Hair stylist, a better Trade system, PvE rewards to rival PvP rank (which we're getting now), 1 vs 1 (also getting), two handed swords and axes, mounts like horses, towns clothing or jewelry, more high end dungeons, and possibly an end to bots (for which a hard nerf of a few critical invincimonk skills would in my opinion outweigh the possible balance issues in pvp if it means ending the bot thing).

But this thread is about GUILD Changes!

Mandy Memory · Apr 25, 2006, 05:43 AM // 05:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lexar

I think the community wants some sort of Hair stylist, a better Trade system, PvE rewards to rival PvP rank (which we're getting now), 1 vs 1 (also getting), two handed swords and axes, mounts like horses, towns clothing or jewelry, more high end dungeons, and possibly an end to bots (for which a hard nerf of a few critical invincimonk skills would in my opinion outweigh the possible balance issues in pvp if it means ending the bot thing).

Actually...No one wants most of those but you.

Hair dresser/ Plastic surgeon /town clothes ~ Heard about it alot...good idea.

Better trading ~ Yep...all the time.

PvE rewards ~ Not very often that you heard this one...mainly because they are already in the game (Not being implemented like you said...you already have them)

1v1 ~ There are some fans...but I have not heard of this being implemented...and I read absolutly everything related to GW.

2 handed swords/axes 1 handed hammers ~ Anyone who knows jack about the game hates this idea, unless it is implemented in a new class with different attributes. Most other people suggest this because X game has it (Normally X game is completely unbalanced)

Mounts ~ Accomplishes nothing...Prolly never going to be implemented, and there are a very small amount of people who even want this.

High end dungeons ~ Actually I rarely hear this one. The catacombs thread is a good one, but mainly its crys for more content overall...who cares what it is.

End to botting ~ Sure...Anet is working on it

Nerfing skills to end botting ~ NO ONE WANTS THIS. Ending bots does not outweigh the game's balance...no matter what you think. Especially because this has been done, and it doesnt stop anything. Nerfing skills solves absolutly nothing. Antifarm, dynamic AI, and non predictable things (traps that deal 150 damage would work, wouldnt kill a normal player, but kills an 55 or 105) those solve the problem.

And none of these have anything to do with guilds...

actionjack · Apr 25, 2006, 05:46 AM // 05:46

Oh wait.. the OP is about GUILDS! not suggestion for the game, but just the Guild Part. Guess it is just a bit missleading.

dargon · Apr 25, 2006, 06:09 AM // 06:09

Quote: