May 15, 2006, 07:35 PM // 19:35
|
#1
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hell. Some people call it middle America though.
Guild: Black Rose Legacy
Profession: W/Mo
|
More Indepth Officer Ranking
I think it'd be kind of neat to be able to play around with Officer Ranking and make it a little more elaborate and drawn out. This is actually a double-idea kind of so bear with me here.
First off, it'd be kind of cool to have more than one type of officer. One could have the Guild Leader, then Generals, then Lieutennants. Each tier having different power in the guild.
Secondly one should be able to have a customized template of Officer types for their guild. Like say if it was a guild based on a religeous hierarchy, instead of a leader they would have a "High Priest" or "High Priestess". It could be based on a Nobles and Aristocratic scale where the leader is "Lord" or something. Maybe there could be a barbaric type of guild where the leader is a "Chieftan" instead.
Just an idea I thought would be neat. Combine the two ideas and you have a cool way to customize your Guild layout I would think.
|
|
|
May 15, 2006, 09:23 PM // 21:23
|
#2
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Guild: Glengarry Fencibles
Profession: R/
|
I agree that there should be a tiered officer heirarchy.
But instead of the customized template it should be based on what type of Guild Hall your Guild has. Different heirarchies according to the individual Guild Halls.
Additionally, the title you have within the Guild should precede your character's name. Example:
Chieftain Dougal Kronik [GLEN]
Tyrian Master Cartographer (95.0%)
|
|
|
May 15, 2006, 09:25 PM // 21:25
|
#3
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
I would like to have this because just Officer seems a bit vague and dull to me. Not to mention it just seems like a large group with the whole titles of Leader,Officer,Member. This would at least make it a bit better for roleplayers.
|
|
|
May 15, 2006, 09:28 PM // 21:28
|
#4
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hell. Some people call it middle America though.
Guild: Black Rose Legacy
Profession: W/Mo
|
Either one could work I think, although it might be somewhat difficult to pin guild titles to certain Guild Halls such as the Jade Hall and the Hall of the Dead. Personally I think your idea would work for the class-based Guild Hall types, but the halls are so diverse that it'd be 20x easier to stick with a template that the guild leader can choose upon guild creation.
As for the title preceding your character's name, I like that idea. Sounds like it'd be a good addition, thanks~
|
|
|
May 15, 2006, 09:32 PM // 21:32
|
#5
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Guild: Blood On The Worlds Hands
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dougal Kronik
I agree that there should be a tiered officer heirarchy.
But instead of the customized template it should be based on what type of Guild Hall your Guild has. Different heirarchies according to the individual Guild Halls.
Additionally, the title you have within the Guild should precede your character's name. Example:
Chieftain Dougal Kronik [GLEN]
Tyrian Master Cartographer (95.0%)
|
imagine the space that would take up though
maybe your title should only appear if you hover your mouse over their name.
|
|
|
May 15, 2006, 09:40 PM // 21:40
|
#6
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hell. Some people call it middle America though.
Guild: Black Rose Legacy
Profession: W/Mo
|
That's logical I suppose. It would take up a lot of room. Or maybe instead of putting it in front of the name you could put it right under it. Like...
Dougal Kronik [GLEN]
Glenberry Fencibles Chieftain
and then just knock off the exploration rate. I never really pay attention to that anyway.
|
|
|
May 15, 2006, 09:43 PM // 21:43
|
#7
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clan_Ravenbourne
...to stick with a template that the guild leader can choose upon guild creation.
|
I think you should be able to change the template anytime you want just so if the guild's ideas change. You know like from religious to barbaric etc.
|
|
|
May 15, 2006, 09:43 PM // 21:43
|
#8
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Dec 2005
Guild: Acolytes of Lyssa [AL]
Profession: Me/A
|
Yay - more reason for elitism, discrimination and separations.
/Not signed. :/
|
|
|
May 15, 2006, 10:06 PM // 22:06
|
#9
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA - FL
Guild: Legends of Nightfall (pm to join!)
Profession: W/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rayne Nightfyre
Yay - more reason for elitism, discrimination and separations.
/Not signed. :/
|
how does that add to elitism if it's only in-guild? If you want the title, start your own guild so it'll say "Guild Lord" next to your name if you're so worried.
BTW, /signed for more officer titles and ranks
|
|
|
May 16, 2006, 02:34 AM // 02:34
|
#10
|
Academy Page
|
/not signed.
GW makes the distinction between the founder, those who can kick and invite, and those who cant.
The rest you can make up and RolePlay yourselves.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:03 PM // 19:03.
|