Jun 15, 2006, 09:23 PM // 21:23
|
#2
|
Wilds Pathfinder
|
OMG, unbalanced.
please don't sign this.
|
|
|
Jun 15, 2006, 09:25 PM // 21:25
|
#3
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NY
|
Um...
Temple Guardians?
no thanks.
/unsign
|
|
|
Jun 15, 2006, 09:27 PM // 21:27
|
#4
|
I dunt even get "Retired"
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: Fifteen Over Fifty [Rare]
|
How would it be unbalanced if pets were still not allowed to have any skills, and it was only skins?
|
|
|
Jun 15, 2006, 09:50 PM // 21:50
|
#5
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Norway!
Guild: The Demonic Brotherhood
Profession: N/E
|
Imagine some one getting ran to droks capping a troll and pwning in ascalon arena...
|
|
|
Jun 15, 2006, 09:51 PM // 21:51
|
#6
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sitting upon Kerrigan's Throne.
Guild: Live For The Swarm [ZERG]
Profession: Me/N
|
hmm... I think i'll go cap Shiro as my pet. He's technically a creature. Or maybe the lich?
/unsign
|
|
|
Jun 15, 2006, 10:00 PM // 22:00
|
#7
|
I dunt even get "Retired"
Join Date: Aug 2005
Guild: Fifteen Over Fifty [Rare]
|
Is everyone completely illiterate? Re-read my suggestion. It would obviously have to have no skills, and have an appropriate amount of hp and armor according to what level it was, and if you capped one over level 20, it would drop to be level 20. Not saying it's a good idea, just use a bit of common sense.
|
|
|
Jun 15, 2006, 11:25 PM // 23:25
|
#8
|
Jungle Guide
|
I don't really see how rangers would be able to have some kind of mind control over every living (and undead?) being there is. Befriending the animals, like it is now, seems more suitable.
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 12:11 AM // 00:11
|
#9
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Apr 2006
Guild: [HiDE]
|
"I'm using Charm Animale on The Undead Lich"
NO
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 12:57 AM // 00:57
|
#10
|
Hell's Protector
Join Date: Oct 2005
Profession: R/Mo
|
Pokeball go!
/undecided
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 12:59 AM // 00:59
|
#11
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Sep 2005
Guild: Border City Bandits [BCB]
|
I like it, but only on creatures, not humanoids (trolls, ettins, tengu, dwarves, etc). Undead is ok, if it's a creature (a bone dog, or one of those little nibbler guys).
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 01:00 AM // 01:00
|
#12
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Mar 2006
Guild: Abaddons Bane
Profession: N/
|
/unsigned
Just the sheer amount of craziness it would cause for everyone to have the coolest looking pet, no skills or anything even. But they would have to go back and change a heck load of code too, and I dont know about you but i don't wanna go through that load
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 01:01 AM // 01:01
|
#13
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Guild: Fifteen Over Fifty [Rare]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TsunamiZ
Cap ANY PVE creature / monster as the look of your pet!
|
Everyone, I've bolded the critical word here.
This isn't a suggestion to actually command an Undead Lich. It's merely a suggestion to have ultimate power over the skin of your pet, essentially. At least, that's how I read it.
And with that in mind, I'm kind of half and half. It's an interesting suggestion, definitely, and could have some hilarious results if implemented, but something seems odd...not sure what that is, though. =/
/undecided
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 01:38 AM // 01:38
|
#14
|
Hall Hero
Join Date: Aug 2005
Profession: E/
|
/notsigned
I can see the griefing now. A ranger with not pet goes into Hell's Precipice with a group to do the mission. They get to the lich and the ranger casts charm animal on lich and then maps out. Mission failed (because you couldn't technicially kill the lich).
It would be kinda cool (I can just see IWAY with all White Mantle Zealots as pets *shutter*), but pretty ridiculous. Plus it would create a whole bunch of stuff like that. Worried about the mursatt monk THK boss? Just bring a ranger with no pet and charm animal to take it out.
Also, it would change the way EoE worked. EoE clumps all pets as being the same type of creature. That would get pretty confusing/wierd if your pet wasn't affected for killing a PvE creature with the exact same skin by EoE.
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 05:55 AM // 05:55
|
#15
|
Desert Nomad
|
Sage Wurm? :S:S:S:S
/unsigned
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 06:05 AM // 06:05
|
#16
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Im a live?
Profession: W/Mo
|
ummm lol?
/unsigned
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 07:22 AM // 07:22
|
#17
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Oz
Guild: Angel Sharks
Profession: Me/N
|
Quote:
Worried about the mursatt monk THK boss? Just bring a ranger with no pet and charm animal to take it out.
|
lol.
Firstly he did say creature I believe, Mursaat, White Mantle, Shiro, Rurik, Undead, and presumably Dwarves don't count.
/unsigned
Because honestly I don't like the idea.
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 07:27 AM // 07:27
|
#18
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Netherlands, gelderland
Guild: none yet
Profession: E/Mo
|
/unsign would be waaaay to much work for aranet and i want to play GW nightfall somewhere in 2007 not 2010
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2006, 08:19 AM // 08:19
|
#20
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Far from you.
Guild: House of Vahn
Profession: W/Mo
|
Trolls small as mini turtles,
Tundra GIANTS small as stalkers.
Wurms small like black widow.
That would look wierdo.
Tiny tiny minotour, so cute so small
You make me want to get a grawl
Idea so bad
This makes me sad..
no no no no no Not signed.. (Think before you post these ideas. Think of all the work)
Last edited by Nanii; Jun 16, 2006 at 08:24 AM // 08:24..
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 PM // 16:30.
|