Curse

TsunamiZ · Nov 30, 2006, 10:58 PM // 22:58

How about an option to hide armor visibility [like cape and headgear], and dye undergarments? Then we can finally have totally bare chested male warriors and gloveless / barefoot characters, etc. With dyable undergarments to match armor pieces.

lyra_song · Nov 30, 2006, 11:10 PM // 23:10

^^; Thats really silly...

too silly for the game, imo

kazjun · Nov 30, 2006, 11:44 PM // 23:44

Um, you do realise that's just asking for a whole load of male players to make female characters run around in their skivvies, right? I mean, they dance in town without their armour on now, put this in and they'll leave town like that too. Not exactly the image that Anet would like to put out.

If you want bare chests, go a male warrior and wear the man-bra...

SpitfireIXA · Nov 30, 2006, 11:52 PM // 23:52

o_O

Noooooooo

Dyeable undergarments is meh with me, don't care either way.

But I don't even want to think about nekkid eles and warriors running around all the time OUTSIDE of Great Temple of Balthazar o_O

Lilanthe · Nov 30, 2006, 11:54 PM // 23:54

wow... that just...

/notsigned

rabbitXcore · Dec 01, 2006, 12:02 AM // 00:02

LMAO...taking the idea of "spare monies for noobz" to a whole new level. this will just make dancing(or trying to anyway) for cash easier if undergarmets are more appealing. which in turn hurts actuall gameplay

/nosign

LifeInfusion · Dec 01, 2006, 01:40 AM // 01:40

NOT SIGNED to hiding armor, I don't even want to think of all the pervs with no armor on.

Why you would dye your undergarments I don't know, so I don't know what to say for that.

Gorebrex · Dec 01, 2006, 02:24 AM // 02:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by TsunamiZ

How about an option to hide armor visibility [like cape and headgear], and dye undergarments? Then we can finally have totally bare chested male warriors and gloveless / barefoot characters, etc. With dyable undergarments to match armor pieces.

As for armor, just take it off, put in inventory, for capes -

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabbitXcore

LMAO...taking the idea of "spare monies for noobz" to a whole new level. this will just make dancing(or trying to anyway) for cash easier if undergarmets are more appealing. which in turn hurts actuall gameplay

/nosign

How does it hurt gameplay?

kang · Dec 01, 2006, 05:32 AM // 05:32

I wouldnt use it on my warrior. And my ele would have more clothes on if I hid the armour.

/notsigned Armour is there for a reason, to keep sharp things from going into your spleen

Elemental Cotton · Dec 01, 2006, 05:55 AM // 05:55

/notsigned
It's just silly, and there'd be idiots abusing that feature. I play the game to play it, not to see people in underwears all the time.

Chris616263 · Dec 01, 2006, 06:01 AM // 06:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by TsunamiZ

How about an option to hide armor visibility [like cape and headgear], and dye undergarments? Then we can finally have totally bare chested male warriors and gloveless / barefoot characters, etc. With dyable undergarments to match armor pieces.

Perverts who want to stare at their characters will be distracted. THAT will hurt gameplay LOL.

Tyggen · Dec 01, 2006, 05:47 PM // 17:47

Yes, lets let the devs spend less time making good looking armour so they can spend more time on the really important stuff; thongs!

/notsigned

MithranArkanere · Dec 01, 2006, 05:51 PM // 17:51

As a mainly Female Elementalist, I don't like a nude crazy perverts following me around to hit me hit thir weapons.

But I won't say anything agains dying hair or undergarnments. Some upper female undergarments looks nice with pants. I use to stay like that on parties and the dragon arena.

Domino · Dec 01, 2006, 06:05 PM // 18:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by MithranArkanere

As a mainly Female Elementalist, I don't like a nude crazy perverts following me around to hit me hit thir weapons.

You liked it, don't lie.

greyf0x_f0x · Dec 01, 2006, 06:24 PM // 18:24

Heck, just make a new armour trader:

"Roy [Skimpy Beachware Crafter]"

costs 15k, and gives you 0 armour. The fashion addicts would lap it up (I'd be first in line >_>)

FelixCarter · Dec 01, 2006, 06:47 PM // 18:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by greyf0x_f0x

Heck, just make a new armour trader:

"Roy [Skimpy Beachware Crafter]"

costs 15k, and gives you 0 armour. The fashion addicts would lap it up (I'd be first in line >_>)

<_<

>_>

<_<

/Signed for this idea

TsunamiZ · Dec 01, 2006, 06:56 PM // 18:56

but the point is you need to have armor to really play. thats why its armor hiding option.

erick5876 · Dec 01, 2006, 08:25 PM // 20:25

/notsigned. Sorry... just not real big on the idea. Unless you can get custom boxers. I want mine to have Scooby Doo on them.

Captain Arne Is PRO · Dec 01, 2006, 08:29 PM // 20:29

Stop beating around the bush pervert, you want a naked Male Mesmer.

Barrett · Dec 01, 2006, 08:39 PM // 20:39

would look silly be silly and be worse then WoW And We Cant Have That