Jan 29, 2007, 07:10 AM // 07:10
|
#1
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
Guild Clans and Alliance names
well ive been thinking on this awile, and just decided to post my idea
1. Guild clans
guild calns would basically be mini factions inside a guild, which can only be created by officers and the guild leader (one clan per officer/leader), it would make things more intresting, give officers more of a reason to recruit,+ it would make sense too, say u have a officer who specialized in GvG, he could have all the gvgers in one clan, making it easy to get groups togethor. also each clan leader would be able to name his alliance whatever he wants) we could make it easy by adding this to the guild registrar guy in the main cities
example
Guild: Riders of ellesmera
leader: Lord Kurt Shurtugal
Clan: Manticoran Alliance
member 1
member 2
etc...
Officers: Kristina swiftarrow
Clan: Silent hunters
member 1
etc...
my second idea is to make it so that instead of our alliance being named after his guild, we make it so that the guild in charge gets to choose the name of the alliance he starts
so what do u think?
|
|
|
Jan 29, 2007, 07:39 AM // 07:39
|
#2
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: hell
Guild: Woot
Profession: P/W
|
/notsigned
quite stupid,a guild should work with each other.
|
|
|
Jan 29, 2007, 07:50 AM // 07:50
|
#3
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Belgium
Guild: [FaRM] Farm For The Win
Profession: N/
|
I have to agree with rong here.
Guilds are made mainly to work together.
If you'll start to split things up between the ranks then it's highly possible that the guild could disband coz of internal problems.
*EDIT*
/sign for alliance names
Last edited by Emik; Jan 29, 2007 at 09:58 AM // 09:58..
|
|
|
Jan 29, 2007, 09:31 AM // 09:31
|
#4
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Jawsome!!!!!!!!!!!
Guild: looking for one :p
Profession: A/D
|
/sign for alliance names
|
|
|
Jan 29, 2007, 07:54 PM // 19:54
|
#5
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: Orhapns of the Shiverpeaks
Profession: N/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emik
I have to agree with rong here.
Guilds are made mainly to work together.
If you'll start to split things up between the ranks then it's highly possible that the guild could disband coz of internal problems.
*EDIT*
/sign for alliance names
|
But isn't half the fun the internal power struggle between Leader and seconds in command?
Why not make this optional? Where the leader can choose whether this should be implemented or not.
|
|
|
Jan 30, 2007, 09:11 PM // 21:11
|
#6
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
an optional setting would be nice, + i dont c how this could create guild tension, i can c internal guild recruiting XD
|
|
|
Jan 30, 2007, 09:34 PM // 21:34
|
#7
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cheltenham, Glos, UK
Guild: Wolf Pack Samurai [WPS]
Profession: R/A
|
Rong happens to be right here (see what I did there? )
Anyway, what would be a good idea is if the Alliance could actually be named and an alliance actually had more of a role than it does now... Cos right now, its just a large guild that has very little communication between the various parts that makes it up
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:38 AM // 08:38.
|