Curse

Chiaro · Mar 15, 2007, 05:48 AM // 05:48

Nearly every female character on GW has a set of armor that isn't conservative. It'd be nice to have some armor that hides the chest and legs, like the males. At least give us a choice(especially for female elementalists, nearly every armor is just fancy lingerie).

EDIT: Nice, word filter. Nice.

FelixCarter · Mar 15, 2007, 06:19 AM // 06:19

It's true that a lot of armors for females are... a tad bit "lingerie-ish". But there are some armors that are conservative. My best friend wanted the same thing, so she chose the female ele "Ascalon Jumpsuit".

It just depends on tastes, I suppose.

cellardweller · Mar 15, 2007, 06:21 AM // 06:21

Monk - Almost all the armours cover neck to knee
Warrior - Over 1/2 of the armours cover neck to toe.
Ranger - Over 1/2 of the armours cover neck to toe.
Mesmer - Over 1/3 of the armours cover neck to toe.
Necromancer - Over 1/3 of the armours cover neck to toe.
Elementalist - Choice of 6 well covered armours
Assassin - Only one or two "skimpy" armours
Ritualist - Only a handful of "skimpy" armours, most cover more than the male versions.
Dervish - Only one "skimpy" armour set.
Paragon - Most are "skimpy", but so are the male versions.

Sounds like a good choice of conservative armours to me.

jcapulet · Mar 15, 2007, 02:40 PM // 14:40

The Ancient armor for elementalists covers a majority of skin. Although, you'd have to get to the Bone Palace.

Eli Rela · Mar 15, 2007, 02:50 PM // 14:50

This game gives a lot of choices, from almost nakked scar pattern to full body Kurzik/Luxon. Primeval armor for Elementalist is very conservative as well.

Please check here to see all available armor in game:

http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Armor_types

Swampgirl Inez · Mar 15, 2007, 03:32 PM // 15:32

Seeing as how this is already ingame, closed.