Curse

warcrap · Dec 03, 2007, 12:46 AM // 00:46

im sorry but i find it unfair that only rangers get to have pets its an unfair advantage i mean i love having pets in-game with me(WoW) but i hate the ranger class (sorry rangers no offence) i just like playing the role of mages.

cant anet just give the animal charm spell to every profession?
or at least give every1 pets for guild wars 2.

or just let us put minipets in the hall of monuments so in gw2 it comes back all grown up and combat ready.

placebo overdose · Dec 03, 2007, 12:48 AM // 00:48

wait for it omg this game has /x so you can be a ele/ranger and have your little pet with no use what so ever but to each his own

warcrap · Dec 03, 2007, 12:50 AM // 00:50

im an elementalist/mesmer

Halmyr · Dec 03, 2007, 12:51 AM // 00:51

mini-pet maybe?

/not signed

each class have there unique skills, go /ranger if you want a fighting pet

Saraphim · Dec 03, 2007, 01:16 AM // 01:16

Having a pet is an unfair advantage? Erm.. no, because if you want an effective pet you need to invest enough attribute points to do so, reducing your damage elsewhere. It's called balance.

My ele sometimes goes out with her moa, and by pulling one point out of E-storage she can just about sustain a pet, but it does bugger all damage. It's just a fun build for mapping with. She still has to go E/R though, which is as it should be.

Tyla · Dec 03, 2007, 01:20 AM // 01:20

failed thread.
warcrap,rangers are attoned to nature - and that is why they can have pets.
whats next an armour plated guy who isnt making adjustments to nature to be able to charm a pet just like that?

Woop Shotty · Dec 03, 2007, 01:25 AM // 01:25

If you got your wish, it would be pointless. You can't give every non-ranger (primary and secondary) charm animal without making the pet deal no damage, not be a target, and not clip. Oh, and although I'd be all for bringing my rainbow phoenix everywhere with me (as Mo/X) just for appearances, I can think of much better skills for slot 8.

placebo overdose · Dec 03, 2007, 01:28 AM // 01:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyla salanari

failed thread.
warcrap,rangers are attoned to nature - and that is why they can have pets.
whats next an armour plated guy who isnt making adjustments to nature to be able to charm a pet just like that?

no what is next is heavy armored eles and minionmaster assasins

HawkofStorms · Dec 03, 2007, 01:37 AM // 01:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by warcrap

im an elementalist/mesmer

You can change your secondary profession to ranger at any time later in the game.

Tyla · Dec 03, 2007, 01:38 AM // 01:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by placebo overdose

no what is next is heavy armored eles and minionmaster assasins

that would be the end of the world.
xD

RSGashapon · Dec 03, 2007, 01:47 AM // 01:47

I love vetted WoWers who come over to the light side with nary a clue.

wetsparks · Dec 03, 2007, 02:20 AM // 02:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by placebo overdose

no what is next is heavy armored eles and minionmaster assasins

i saw one of those in AB the other day

Isileth · Dec 03, 2007, 02:49 AM // 02:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by warcrap

im sorry but i find it unfair that only rangers get to have pets its an unfair advantage

I find it unfair only eles can use MS, give it to everyone.
Its not fair warriors get Dragon Slash, give it to everyone.

Its not an unfair advantage, its part of that proffesion.
They are meant to be different and do different things.

genofreek · Dec 03, 2007, 03:00 AM // 03:00

Different classes do different things. Elementalists set fire to things, necromancers raise the dead, dervishes do the most AoE melee damage. If every class was all much of a muchness, GW would be boring as hell and the differences between classes would only be cosmetic.

Make a new Ranger character, or unlock /R as your secondary. You can do that a bit later in any campaign. I guarantee going E/R is going to cripple your attack power, though. Pets demand a pretty big investment of att points, skill slots to keep them up and running, and if they die your skills are temporarily disabled.

/notsigned, as far as I'm concerned the rangers can keep Charm Animal.

You can't see me · Dec 03, 2007, 03:14 AM // 03:14

/Not Signed

Your secondary profession can be changed, and Beast Mastery is not a prime attribute.

Major Fail.

RPGmaniac · Dec 03, 2007, 03:19 AM // 03:19

Is it unfair that only Hunters and Warlocks get some sort of pet in WoW? At least in GW there IS a way for mages to get a pet. Switch to /R later in the game and bring a pet if you want to.

Off-topic: while looking on WoW's website to double check that above fact, I found out Blizzard is merging with Activision.

Plus if pets were so unfair, everybody in HA and GvG would have beastmaster builds. Pets aren't really effective for combat (albeit a couple builds). They're more of a cosmetic thing.

mrmango · Dec 03, 2007, 03:20 AM // 03:20

Close idiocy please.

silv3rr · Dec 03, 2007, 04:03 AM // 04:03

Why is it every single one of your posts are all impending fails??

But since we're at it... I want them to allow 8 profession classes...

I wanna be a, W/A/R/Rt/Me/Mo/Ele/Nec... I'll be a jack of all trades.

Div · Dec 03, 2007, 04:40 AM // 04:40

Why do only warriors have swordsmanship. I want my sin to have it too. And what about my battle mage elementalist. Wow, sad threads being started here.

Lady Raenef · Dec 03, 2007, 04:59 AM // 04:59

/notsigned.

No.