Dec 18, 2007, 06:19 PM // 18:19
|
#1
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago
Guild: your cat eats dog food [pup]
Profession: N/E
|
Make lower rank titles available to display
Hi all,
Based on my discussion thread here:
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10233848
I decided to post a suggestion. Allow us to choose the rank of a title that we wish to display, as long as it is lower than what we have achieved.
For example, If you want to max your Deldrimoor rank, but you like the sound of Epic Delver vs. Legendary Delver this would allow you to display that title even if you maxed it. Someone with Font of Wisdom could still choose to display Seeker of Wisdom etc...
This seems pretty harmless to me and it's just for fun...
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 06:24 PM // 18:24
|
#2
|
Underworld Spelunker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: wikipedia.org/wiki/Vigo
Guild: Heraldos de la Llama Oscura [HLO]
Profession: E/
|
If you are level 20 you can't show level 15.
If you are a warrior can't show paragon.
Things that 'are' are the things 'shown'. Why to change that?
If you are Legendary Delver you are not Epic Delver, you are Legendary Delver.
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 06:29 PM // 18:29
|
#3
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Sep 2007
Guild: [Yeti]
Profession: E/
|
sorry /notsigned. I would never want to show a lower title than what i have.
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 06:34 PM // 18:34
|
#4
|
Desert Nomad
|
Want to show my survivor(1) title on my warrior and then start PUG'ing with a Healing Hands build
only reason I could think off the idea would be nice
other then that
/notsigned
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 06:40 PM // 18:40
|
#5
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Guild: Rank Three Plus Pug [deer]
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fried Tech
sorry /notsigned. I would never want to show a lower title than what i have.
|
Yeah, and with this change, you wouldn't have to. Isn't having a choice wonderful?
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 06:43 PM // 18:43
|
#6
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada! eh!
Guild: ~none~
Profession: W/Me
|
Theres a litle number beside every titled displayed. The higher it is, the better.
As long as that number stay at the rank you are, I see no problem with it.
/signed
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 06:50 PM // 18:50
|
#7
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Nov 2006
Profession: W/
|
always wanted to show *charmed* again...
don't see such an update coming, but /signed
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 07:26 PM // 19:26
|
#8
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Mar 2006
Guild: Thanks to all the guru [mods]
|
Epic Delver > legendary Delver.
/signed.
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 07:34 PM // 19:34
|
#9
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: May 2006
Profession: R/
|
I can't see a reason why this would hurt, but at the same time I can't see them uncoupling the "title level" and "title displayed" for something this useless to so many people.
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 07:38 PM // 19:38
|
#10
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Malta
Guild: [CuTe]
Profession: E/
|
As the OP said its just for fun and its not harmless at all
/signed
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 07:38 PM // 19:38
|
#11
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Dec 2006
Guild: Hate The [Cape]
Profession: E/
|
/notsigned
No point.
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 07:40 PM // 19:40
|
#12
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Aug 2007
Profession: Rt/A
|
Actually, Epic delver and Legendary Delver should be turned around.
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 08:59 PM // 20:59
|
#13
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ct
Guild: Scars Meadows [SMS]
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by intarwebs
Actually, Epic delver and Legendary Delver should be turned around.
|
i agree to a point, it would be sweet to have any title with epic in it, but then it wouldnt go with the anet "theme" of max titles being legendary(legendary survivor, vanquisher, guardian, cart, etc)
o and off topic, i think r9 asura should be "Not Too Epic"
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2007, 09:24 PM // 21:24
|
#14
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Astral Revenants
Profession: P/W
|
I don't really see the point...
/signed anyway, it doesn't hurt anyone.
|
|
|
Dec 19, 2007, 12:18 AM // 00:18
|
#15
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Guild: Jenova's Apocolyptic Remains [JAR]
Profession: D/
|
It's been suggested before, and I'll /sign again because I like the idea of retroactive titles. Charmed > Lucky.
|
|
|
Dec 19, 2007, 03:34 AM // 03:34
|
#16
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Guild: Rank Three Plus Pug [deer]
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Limu Tolkki
/notsigned
No point.
|
I don't understand this reasoning. No point? Maybe not for you, but obviously there is support for it in this thread which means other people have a reason for it. And the reason does not put anyone at an advantage or disadvantage, it is purely for fun, just like different armor skins. What's the point of different armor skins? They all max out at the same level anyway. Guess we should just get rid of skins and everyone can look the same. What's the point anyhow?
Please, use the gray matter before posting such useless responses.
|
|
|
Dec 19, 2007, 09:58 AM // 09:58
|
#17
|
Desert Nomad
|
signed..
i would find this especially for the norn title absolute cool, because the higher ones get more and more crappier sounding...so higher you get..
When I'm maxed with the norn title..I personall<y would like to stay showing "Demon Slayer" ...at least one title rank name..that sounds from all norn ranks most coolest and can also be used good in RPG ^^
just let stay the number in () then at the max..so people can see. if someone is only the low rank..or if someone is maxed and shows only the lower rank cause of personal better likings.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:55 PM // 21:55.
|