Jan 28, 2008, 06:15 PM // 18:15
|
#2
|
So Serious...
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Guild: Nerfs Are [WHAK]
Profession: E/
|
Not much to say apart from /signed
Let's make this thread and idea a winner!
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 06:22 PM // 18:22
|
#3
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
Profession: Mo/
|
lol
/sign
Though I have to say this. Anet does not want those gold sellers vanish lol. They want them get banned more and more so they get more and more money lol.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 06:22 PM // 18:22
|
#4
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: EastCoast
Profession: E/Me
|
/signed
Now think of a way to get rid of the 500 scrub guilds recruiting in la.
Maybe a guild recruit chat for all guild messages to go. But that wouldn't work would it. People still use local to sell and people would still use local to spam there crappy guild messages.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 06:23 PM // 18:23
|
#5
|
Frost Gate Guardian
|
This would require anet to do some extra work, therefore it won't happen.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 06:23 PM // 18:23
|
#6
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: EastCoast
Profession: E/Me
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NamelessBeauty
lol
/sign
Though I have to say this. Anet does not want those gold sellers vanish lol. They want them get banned more and more so they get more and more money lol.
|
if they truely wanted them banned they would have a gm go to gtob id1 every day and ban them all
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 06:53 PM // 18:53
|
#7
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: England
Guild: [NsW]
Profession: R/N
|
/sign
definitley. It needs to stop. It's a game, it's fun, stop trying to make money from it and get a real job, lol.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 07:09 PM // 19:09
|
#8
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Guild: [OOP] Order of the Phoenix I
|
/Signed - Great idea.
Though it might be hard to develop the list at first.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 07:16 PM // 19:16
|
#9
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Dec 2007
Profession: E/
|
/signed
at operative
with all the spammers for the gold anet has chatlogs of what happens
that's how you can get busted for swearing and stuff
they take out the sites from the chatlogs and then they probably would have a good list of sites
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 07:25 PM // 19:25
|
#10
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Deep South
Guild: The Arctic Marauders[TAM] Former Leader and Officer | [SMS] Alliance
Profession: W/E
|
/signed
Tired of all the crap in Temple of Bal
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 07:31 PM // 19:31
|
#11
|
Hall Hero
Join Date: Aug 2005
Profession: E/
|
/signed
Interesting idea.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 07:39 PM // 19:39
|
#12
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: Team Apathy [aFk]
Profession: W/P
|
But I love the bots in gtob who spam you every 3 seconds. They'll find ways to bypass it.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 08:28 PM // 20:28
|
#14
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canada
Guild: Guy In Real Life [GIRL]
Profession: W/E
|
/signed
yay for ideas that origionated in Runescape!
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 08:28 PM // 20:28
|
#15
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: Drawn and Quartered
Profession: R/N
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NamelessBeauty
lol
/sign
Though I have to say this. Anet does not want those gold sellers vanish lol. They want them get banned more and more so they get more and more money lol.
|
Not true, Gaile actually posted about how the manpower and research to ban accounts costs them more money than the gold sellers buying new games. e.e
/signed
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 08:34 PM // 20:34
|
#16
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arizona, USA
Guild: [OOP] Order of the Phoenix I
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N1ghtstalker
/signed
at operative
with all the spammers for the gold anet has chatlogs of what happens
that's how you can get busted for swearing and stuff
they take out the sites from the chatlogs and then they probably would have a good list of sites
|
Yeah, but still going through those chat logs and documenting each and every website along with all the other superfluous chatter would be a pretty major job. I'm not saying it wouldn't be worthwhile to do it, just that initially it would be a pretty good amount of work.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 09:07 PM // 21:07
|
#17
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia
Guild: Spirit of Elisha
Profession: W/
|
/notsigned.
Sorry, but it won't work. I've seen it tried on other sites and it simply doesn't work.
You have a spammer spamming "Cheap gold!!! Goto www.cheapgoldsite.com!!!!"
So, the powers that be filter www.cheapgoldsite.com.
The spammers return with "Cheap gold!!! Goto vvvvvv.cheapgoldsite.com"
Filter now filters cheapgoldsite.com.
Spammer: "Cheap gold!! Visit w w w . c h e a p g o l d s i t e . c o m!!!!"
Filter now becomes smart enough to take out spaces and filter the result.
Spammer: "Cheap gold!!!! Visit w w w.c H e @ P G 0 l D $ I + e. COM!!!!"
It's a never ending cycle. No matter what you filter, the spammer can change the message enough to bypass it.
It happens now. The "F" word is filtered in GW if you have your chat filter on. So does that mean you never see that particular profanity in local chat from the resident 12 year olds? Nope! They use it everyday with creative spelling.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 09:31 PM // 21:31
|
#18
|
So Serious...
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Guild: Nerfs Are [WHAK]
Profession: E/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRaven
Spammer: "Cheap gold!!!! Visit w w w.c H e @ P G 0 l D $ I + e. COM!!!!"
It's a never ending cycle.
|
You're right, but at the point highlighted above, the spammers stop being efficient because people need to decode. And don't compare it to the F word, because it's totally different: one is a word used for people to express emotions(?) while the other is a link. If you make difficult to use the first one, people still express emotions (or whatever else), while making difficult the display of spamsites urls harms their business.
Why would you want to /notsign on a feature that would at best rid the game of some spammers and at worst change nothing? I mean, if you think in terms of average, it has to be better than the current situation, isn't it?
I don't think it's technically difficult, you can even have a simple url parser that can efficiently do that without much overhead.
There's not so much RMT in GW, so let's try to get a consensus here so that there's even more!
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 10:08 PM // 22:08
|
#19
|
Underworld Spelunker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: wikipedia.org/wiki/Vigo
Guild: Heraldos de la Llama Oscura [HLO]
Profession: E/
|
I think it would be eaier wise use of the /report comand an bigger ignore list.
And even better if there were an 'alarm' when someone gets ignored by a lot of people.
But a new filter that includes web-pages in the Local channel would be good.
The only reason to tell pages is for a forum of a guild, or this forum, and that can be done by team and, guild, alliance, etc.
|
|
|
Jan 28, 2008, 10:12 PM // 22:12
|
#20
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Astral Revenants
Profession: P/W
|
There are ways to get around filters. A bigger ignore list may be more useful.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:42 PM // 20:42.
|