Curse

Elisabet Ramsey · Feb 16, 2008, 12:36 AM // 00:36

/signed
Maybe split it into 4 titles and 1 maxed like legendary guardian. Tyrian Quest Hunter, Factions Quest Hunter, Elonian Quest Hunter, Eye of the North Quest Hunter, and Legendary Quest hunter.

You can't see me · Feb 16, 2008, 12:40 AM // 00:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elisabet Ramsey

/signed
Maybe split it into 4 titles and 1 maxed like legendary guardian. Tyrian Quest Hunter, Factions Quest Hunter, Elonian Quest Hunter, Eye of the North Quest Hunter, and Legendary Quest hunter.

Yes, please.

**Marty Silverblade** · Feb 16, 2008, 12:42 AM // 00:42

/notsigned

Though this seems like a good idea, it'll be hard to implement unless certain things are put into place (like quests on istan, shing jea island, and before LA wouldn't count because that would screw up foreign chars, cap sig quests could be awkward, campaign specific stuff in general.)

Pan Head · Feb 16, 2008, 01:38 AM // 01:38

/signed

Love the idea.

i would already have the title for tyria and very close on th eother two chapters.

Stella/Shin · Feb 16, 2008, 11:38 AM // 11:38

i agree this title will benefit the game the quite alot beecause it would also lead to completion of other titles like the explorer title, and sunspear and lightbringer

Stella/Shin · Feb 16, 2008, 11:48 AM // 11:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elisabet Ramsey

/signed
Maybe split it into 4 titles and 1 maxed like legendary guardian. Tyrian Quest Hunter, Factions Quest Hunter, Elonian Quest Hunter, Eye of the North Quest Hunter, and Legendary Quest hunter.

don't agree with the Eye of the North quest hunter because there's no title for exporer or protector of the north. It all goes to your adventurer of the north title track including the quests....

crazybanshee · Feb 16, 2008, 02:47 PM // 14:47

/not signed

I did every quest I saw, but I still missed some, plus not all quests are available to all classes, plus when you move your char from one campaign to another not all quests are available.. logistical and programming nightmare. I'd rather see that kind of work put into gw2.

Malice Black · Feb 16, 2008, 03:02 PM // 15:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uber Mass

ah yes a title where you actually need to play the game for... <333

For this reason.

Yawgmoth · Feb 16, 2008, 03:50 PM // 15:50

/not singned

*it's impossible to track the quests done before, some quests changed over time, some were seasonal or event connected
*also some professions have more quests than others
*also characters starting in different campagins have access to completely different number of quests inaccessible to characters from another campagins
*there are also many quests which should not be finished because of farming opportunities.

Title like this is not needed, better increase quest rewards or something.

MithranArkanere · Feb 16, 2008, 04:46 PM // 16:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yawgmoth

/not singned

*it's impossible to track the quests done before, some quests changed over time, some were seasonal or event connected
*also some professions have more quests than others
*also characters starting in different campagins have access to completely different number of quests inaccessible to characters from another campagins
*there are also many quests which should not be finished because of farming opportunities.

Title like this is not needed, better increase quest rewards or something.

- It's not impossible. It's already done. You cannot take a quest again because thay have a variable in your character that tags it as 'already made the quest'.
- Yup, that's because this title WON'T count Tutorial quests:
*NO tutorial quests, profession speciic nor campaign exclusive quests. That is, most quests before Lion's Arch, The Market and Consulate docks.
*Repeatable quests would count once (Like EotN repeatale quests ALREADY do in the Master of the North title).
*Although Anet is not against player farming, they won't support it either. So who cares? Want to keep the farming? Don't get the title. There are also missions that change things, like making Zen Daijun. Will you stop making it to be able to kill the Kirin that only appear in there and some low-end afflicted? That's your choice.

U Wanna Die · Feb 16, 2008, 05:45 PM // 17:45

I answered other because i think i t is a clever idea but what about pre-searing quests when it takes 30 secs to complete the first 3 quests. If this was made people would do that easy beginner quests they never did and besides what if I want it on my warrior and he already did to many quests. I thin in theory its a good idea, it would just need to be refined more. Maybe a title tracking the xp u get from quests, but then they do factions. I think it would work but it would need to be more specific.

Nanood · Feb 17, 2008, 09:45 PM // 21:45

Y not.. It's not like the game suffers to have more reasons to participate.

/signed

genofreek · Feb 17, 2008, 10:17 PM // 22:17

/signed, but only if it can be given retrospectively. I make my characters do all the quests, so most of them are done or close to it already. XD

MithranArkanere · Feb 17, 2008, 10:45 PM // 22:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by genofreek

/signed, but only if it can be given retrospectively. I make my characters do all the quests, so most of them are done or close to it already. XD

All achievemnt titles were given retroactively.
That's because they are based upon making something once. And since 'quests done' data is already stored, like missiones done or map explored or skils learned, it can be done.

Skyy High · Feb 17, 2008, 10:59 PM // 22:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by MithranArkanere

- It's not impossible. It's already done. You cannot take a quest again because thay have a variable in your character that tags it as 'already made the quest'.

I'm so glad we have a programmer on these forums to tell us exactly what the game tracks and doesn't track. I wouldn't make any assumptions about what the game "knows" about our characters; if this title were feasible, I would imagine it would have been done by now.

So /notsigned, just because I can't see it as something easily done.

MithranArkanere · Feb 17, 2008, 11:06 PM // 23:06

So, tell me, how come tat you cannot make again some quests with differnt characters if it's not by setting flags to store such data?

Mystically? How is it done si secondary. The more important it's i it must be dune, and it must.

Just using logic, you'll know that It can be done in a slightly harder way than Protector and Guardians, and easier than Master of the North.

Chrono Re delle Ere · Feb 17, 2008, 11:12 PM // 23:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyy High

I'm so glad we have a programmer on these forums to tell us exactly what the game tracks and doesn't track. I wouldn't make any assumptions about what the game "knows" about our characters; if this title were feasible, I would imagine it would have been done by now.

So /notsigned, just because I can't see it as something easily done.

So you saying you dont' want it because it would theorically hard to implement? We payd them to play the game, they gotta do their work. Furthemore as the guy you quoted is not a programmer , you also are not; it could be easily done or hardly done, nobody of us (I guess) really knows.

Raiku · Feb 18, 2008, 03:32 AM // 03:32

a Title for every quest done in HM and NM!

Kerwyn Nasilan · Feb 18, 2008, 03:42 AM // 03:42

I agree only if there is someway to see which quests you have completed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raiku

a Title for every quest done in HM and NM!

Impossible, can only do a quest once so both in NM and NM would be impossible.

newbie_of_doom · Feb 18, 2008, 08:17 AM // 08:17

/signed

would be cool