Curse

Tab · Feb 22, 2008, 03:45 PM // 15:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix Tears

lol yes a pair is 2 ... 1+1 = 2 you stupid idiot...2 single opponents make the "pair".

The one thats not the brightest here is you. If there would be a price for being most retarded, you would win it.
The only thing, what such retarded fools like you can do, is not stop flaming and insulting, what others you can't. You're way too small minded for intelectual conversations about something.

Your a poor pitiful ***hole, which hides his inability of social behavior behind the "shield" of Anonymity. A person, I personally would call antisocial scum.

I did never said, that Gladiators fight only duels of 1vs1 ...
Wiki said it too: it were typical battles of Pairs and pairs are 2 Combatants - means 2 single Gladiators.... everything else was UNTYPICAL, but was also made, when REQUESTED.

The Point about Gladiator Title/ RA is.. there is NO Requestion.. players get all forced to make for gladiators untypical 4vs4 battles, where the standart are 1vs1 Duels or 1vsX (2-3) battles for a higher handicap.

Therefore the suggestion, that Anet should implement Gladiator Skills and make out of the Gladiator Title an own Gladiator PvP Mode similar to Costume Brawl with given balanced skill builds for each own profession, so that the game will receive finaly also a 1vs1 PvP, because it is impossible to make a balanced 1vs1 with all the existing old skills. It have to be new, extra for this mode based skills, only then there can exists in GW a balanced 1vs1 PvP Mode. And only 1vs1 with given Skill Builds similar to Costume Brawl require real gameplay skills and when it's 1vs1 it won't come with the typical problem of Leeching, because you simple can't leech in a 1vs1.

My last comment in here in this thread, because arguing with such a retard, like you is like talking with thick walls, there I have the same ignorance, only the arrogance can't simulate a wall oO

PS: @The Way out:

I never stated, that the gameplay around Gladiators ingame should become a 1:1 simulation of real gladiators from historic -.- , just that the concept around the title is screwed up, because it doesn't count to a 1vs1 pvp gameplay.. as it should better

If he's so retarded, why can't you use grammar?

Team Ramrod · Feb 22, 2008, 03:48 PM // 15:48

terrible idea like really bad....though i wouldnt mind getting fame in AB so i wouldnt have to bother going to go to the shithole that is heroes ascent for dem leet emotes!!11!!, but ofc that wont happen.

Snow Bunny · Feb 22, 2008, 04:56 PM // 16:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkobra

You ever tried chanting Protective Spirit seconds before a swift kick to the nuts? Want to volunteer Phoenix to try?

I'd prot Phoenix with Spirit Bond, but you don't find monks in Gladiator Arenas, because it's not historically accurate to have them.

Greaterbeing · Feb 22, 2008, 05:04 PM // 17:04

/notsigned..

Just lol.. LOL..

Pleikki · Feb 22, 2008, 05:28 PM // 17:28

/notsignet TOO EASY get it then imo

DarkBahamut · Feb 22, 2008, 09:38 PM // 21:38

Can I get ectos for winning AB? Or at least some shards?
Kk, maybe just 1k for each win?

No?

Meh

/notsigned btw

roflcopter2445 · Feb 22, 2008, 11:08 PM // 23:08

do you see the word "arena" in "alliance battle"?

/notsigned

Master Ketsu · Feb 22, 2008, 11:22 PM // 23:22

/unsign

/gasoline

/burn

/nuke

Sir Owns Alot EP · Feb 23, 2008, 12:56 AM // 00:56

You guys are unbelievable. Just because you disagree with his idea doesn't make him a "noob". Some people don't play sixty hours a week like some of the people on this forum, and they just want an easier way to get titles. The rampant "elitism" is really going to far in GW. You guys need to realize that its a damn game, no a competition for who can put the most hours in.

Nevin · Feb 23, 2008, 02:42 AM // 02:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackSephir

Actually, I think he's pretty serious and that's what makes it so sad.
Hey, I've got another awesome question: should we earn fame in AB?!1/!?1/11/

Nope, but we should earn gladiator points in AB. Hell the stuff is just as hectic.

/sign /sign /sign

crazybanshee · Feb 23, 2008, 05:42 AM // 05:42

ERgh. Terrible idea. Ab has its own reward system. Why not just give norn points for asura farming. Why not just give everyone maxed titles without working for it. /Epic fail.

Tyla · Feb 23, 2008, 09:17 PM // 21:17

No.
Again, AB is even easier than RA.
Not only that but it favours a certain side depending on the map.

Snow Bunny · Feb 23, 2008, 09:47 PM // 21:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir Owns Alot EP

You guys are unbelievable. Just because you disagree with his idea doesn't make him a "noob". Some people don't play sixty hours a week like some of the people on this forum, and they just want an easier way to get titles. The rampant "elitism" is really going to far in GW. You guys need to realize that its a damn game, no a competition for who can put the most hours in.

I'm going to stretch a little and call you a scrub.

I see it fits you perfectly.

Not to mention that this idea is just bad.

Kanyatta · Feb 23, 2008, 11:45 PM // 23:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir Owns Alot EP

You guys are unbelievable. Just because you disagree with his idea doesn't make him a "noob". Some people don't play sixty hours a week like some of the people on this forum, and they just want an easier way to get titles. The rampant "elitism" is really going to far in GW. You guys need to realize that its a damn game, no a competition for who can put the most hours in.

1. Seriously, if Gladiator Points are that hard to earn that the OP needs them in AB, he's probably a noob.

2. I personally don't know anyone that plays over 20 hours a week.

3. All of the "elitism" would stop if people stopped being bad

4. Who said anything about "I have more hours than you, therefore I am better at the game."? Yes, it is just a game, but a lot of people are tired of noobs QQing to make the game easier.

shru · Feb 24, 2008, 12:08 AM // 00:08

My question is where have the mods been the last 7 pages? Any monkey with keyboard could see this topic had flame bait written all over it and that it was just going to degrade (considering where it started is this even the right word) into useless arguements, elitism, and general chaos. With how actively mods are banning, locking, and editing in other forums, I'm surprised and, sadly disapointed, the same attention is not given to threads as deserving as this.
And one more time, can we get a lock on this thread?

Winterclaw · Feb 24, 2008, 12:29 AM // 00:29

I just had a thought, instead of glad points, how about some other form of point system if you win a lot of battles while you are in the opposing faction's second and final bases. Maybe you get a bonus if your side takes over the capital.

ax mastery · Feb 24, 2008, 12:37 AM // 00:37

I'm all for this if one of my pve titles gets maxed for every gvg i win!

I'm serious.

Snow Bunny · Feb 24, 2008, 01:38 AM // 01:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winterclaw

I just had a thought, instead of glad points, how about some other form of point system if you win a lot of battles while you are in the opposing faction's second and final bases. Maybe you get a bonus if your side takes over the capital.

You're missing the point.

AB takes no skill. RA takes none either, and shouldn't be given glad points either.

Nevin · Feb 24, 2008, 01:40 AM // 01:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snow Bunny

You're missing the point.

AB takes no skill. RA takes none either, and shouldn't be given glad points either.

Good example of the downfall of the GW community.

TheGuildWarsPenguin · Feb 24, 2008, 03:21 AM // 03:21

Topic needs moar closure. It's like free +1 post count to everyone saying "olol glad points in AB 12 chars /notsigned yay +1 post count OP is idiot olol".