Curse

Konig Des Todes · Apr 08, 2008, 08:44 PM // 20:44

The title was originally made for just the ring games, not chest runs, so when thinking about the logic/balance of this title, you have to ignore the new addition of the lockpicks.

When ignoring the lockpicks, losing 500,000 games is close to winning 2,500,000 tickets. I am not really wanting to get into the math, but paying 30g to lose 1 game and paying 30g to get 5, 25, 40, or 55 tickets seems a good evening out, especially since you get more tickets then you lose when getting the winning circle.

The Meth · Apr 09, 2008, 02:53 AM // 02:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Azazel The Assassin

The title was originally made for just the ring games, not chest runs, so when thinking about the logic/balance of this title, you have to ignore the new addition of the lockpicks.

When ignoring the lockpicks, losing 500,000 games is close to winning 2,500,000 tickets. I am not really wanting to get into the math, but paying 30g to lose 1 game and paying 30g to get 5, 25, 40, or 55 tickets seems a good evening out, especially since you get more tickets then you lose when getting the winning circle.

Actually thats quite off, from guild wiki luck titles guide:
Tickets won per Hour 3,454
Games lost per Hour 243.3
So be the time you would get 2.5 million tickets won (R6 lucky) you would on average have only lost 176,100 games, not even R6 Unlucky.

/signed for making either r6 max for unlucky, or allowing lucky to go up to r7 and give us more games

Lycan Nibbler · Apr 09, 2008, 03:09 AM // 03:09

It does seem slightly illogical to have r7 on one and only r6 on the other. However, as I am sure quite a few people have them by now, I very much doubt any change will be made.

Just wish they would have another double lucky/unlucky chest weekend as Im just over 2 mil lucky but 155k unlucky (think I'll likely be on the 16 rings next event......).