Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > Sardelac Sanitarium

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 04, 2008, 12:01 AM // 00:01   #1
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default More than 3 heroes at a time?

I would like to apologize if this has already been suggested, My search has not come up with any other threads suggesting this...

I would like to submit a suggestion to have more than three heroes per player at a time.

The benefits would be obvious. Having a party of more capable hero's would really out way the henchmen, and allowing you to take a more fine tuned party along for missions and quests.

The only downside I see is the balance of skills might be used more often to make the mix up the difficulty level of missions.

It would be nice to use all the heroes to build a party based on our own playing style, rather than conforming to what works best with the supplied henchmen.
famous phil is offline  
Old May 04, 2008, 12:03 AM // 00:03   #2
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Profession: E/Me
Default

http://guildwarsguru.com/forum/showt...hlight=7+heros


there u go
Voltaic Annihilator is offline  
Old May 04, 2008, 12:22 AM // 00:22   #3
Furnace Stoker
 
MagmaRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Our Crabs Know True [LOVE]
Profession: R/
Default

/unsigned

You didn't search very well, and the idea is against what a MULTIPLAYER game does. Try playing with people.
MagmaRed is offline  
Old May 04, 2008, 12:24 AM // 00:24   #4
Wilds Pathfinder
 
the savage nornbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Guild: The Raging Cadavers [rage]
Profession: R/
Default

wont happen. ever.
the savage nornbear is offline  
Old May 04, 2008, 12:32 AM // 00:32   #5
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Nyktos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Guild: The Nyktos Guild [win]
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MagmaRed
/unsigned

You didn't search very well, and the idea is against what a MULTIPLAYER game does. Try playing with people.
Why don't you try playing a game that didn't advertise the ability to play with AI as a major part of the game?
Nyktos is offline  
Old May 04, 2008, 12:55 AM // 00:55   #6
Wilds Pathfinder
 
HuntMaster Avatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Around
Guild: Pillar's of Earth [ROCK]
Profession: W/
Default

/Signed for 7 heroes.
/Signed for replacing crap henchmen with personal heroes.
/Signed because I'v signed this idea 100 times before.

We can already play with full party of H/H so the whole playing with people arguement is pointless, atleast with 7 heroes we could enjoy the game more than we do with henchmen.

Just because a game is mulitplayer doesnt mean you have to play with people. There is almost always a solo/npc feature on every multiplayer game.

There will always be a large group of people who enjoy playing with other people, and there will always be a large group of people who like to H/H.

Besides, after awhile dealing with the hostility and immaturity of players removes the fun of the game, So heroes are a great alternative to keeping the game fun.
HuntMaster Avatar is offline  
Old May 04, 2008, 12:55 AM // 00:55   #7
Forge Runner
 
Marverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Profession: R/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MagmaRed
/unsigned

You didn't search very well, and the idea is against what a MULTIPLAYER game does. Try playing with people.
Before you make stupid, unintelligent comments, why don't you read the other thread first?

7 heroes is not a complete alternative to playing with other people. It's just another option. Sometimes there just isn't anyone interested in doing what we want to do. 7 heroes allows us to still do it (without having to deal with hench retardedness) instead of having to put it off.

It's because of idiots like you that this will never get implemented. They never bother to open their mind and listen for once instead of jabbering on constantly about a point that has already been rebutted. If you're going to be stubborn then at least don't be stupid.

I'm just going to /sign this for the heck of it.
Marverick is offline  
Old May 04, 2008, 01:35 AM // 01:35   #8
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MagmaRed
/unsigned

You didn't search very well, and the idea is against what a MULTIPLAYER game does. Try playing with people.
Ok, so it seems that I did not search that well, but to use that argument would say that heroes and henchmen should not be used at all.

You have to agree that pugs aren't that great, and guild mates are not always on.

I'm just saying that there are many different ways to play the game, I would like to try them all, and discover new ways to do it. This would open a lot of new possibilities by having a infinitely customizable party.

Since this is a redundant thread please close. I apologize again.

Last edited by famous phil; May 04, 2008 at 01:41 AM // 01:41..
famous phil is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
looking for 2 runs for a time for heroes NM dale1112 Explorer's League 1 Apr 18, 2008 06:47 PM // 18:47
Running a Time For Heroes -NM&HM- WARPATh Services Offered 6 Mar 30, 2008 07:49 AM // 07:49
LF A Time for Heroes Runner hippo942 Services Offered 0 Feb 09, 2008 10:36 AM // 10:36
LF: Time for heroes runner (NM) FbX Services Offered 0 Jan 26, 2008 02:54 PM // 14:54
LifesRestorer Services Offered 0 Nov 05, 2007 06:11 PM // 18:11


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23 PM // 17:23.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("