Curse

Marverick · Jul 08, 2008, 05:53 AM // 05:53

Since HoM is going to be account wide, this title should also be made account wide, since it also affects the Hall of Monuments but rewards single-character play.
It should count the total number of unique maxed titles present in all of your characters and use that number. It wouldn't be any harder to do since you'd still have to get all the titles. But you wouldn't have to do it all on one character.

Lawrence Chang · Jul 08, 2008, 05:55 AM // 05:55

Alot of other titles should be accountwide, including Treasure Hunter and Wisdom.

MirkoTeran · Jul 08, 2008, 06:00 AM // 06:00

No need to cheapen the title that doesn't bring any benefits.

Konig Des Todes · Jul 08, 2008, 06:29 AM // 06:29

I don't see a need to make KoaBD account wide, but I do see where you are coming from. It wouldn't be terrible if the title only counted each title one per account, so that people cannot make 8 characters and get all three protectors, then have 24 maxed titles. Doing that will encourage multiple character play as much as the account based HoM. But again, I don't see a real need to do so (but that's because I like playing minimal characters, so my opinion is biased).

Although I do think Sweet Tooth, Drunkard, Party Animal, Wisdom, and Treasure Hunter titles should be account wide, and if those five titles are account wide, that makes KoaBD easier in terms of having it on all characters.

isildorbiafra · Jul 08, 2008, 09:20 AM // 09:20

This title is only for those who invested alot of time in the development of a single character! NOT SIGNED!!!!!!!!!!

Oukanna · Jul 08, 2008, 10:56 AM // 10:56

Sweet tooth and drunkard etc, i think should be account wide, as they are soo expensive and drunkard is expensive and time consuming.

KoBD shouldnt really be account wide, as its a title for maxed titles on your character. Giving it account wide access, sort of cheapens it i think.

Tyla · Jul 08, 2008, 10:59 AM // 10:59

The only titles that should be account-wide (Providing the other characters are level 20), are rep and big grinds.

N1ghtstalker · Jul 08, 2008, 11:17 AM // 11:17

/notsigned imo
the only account wide titles should be wisdom and treasure
that's it

odly · Jul 08, 2008, 11:42 AM // 11:42

Well I'll sign it.

/signed

It's a bit late for me now, but I would have preferred getting legendary vanquisher, skillhunter and guardian on different characters.
I dislike the way KOBD tittle makes us play just one character all the time.

I understand how it doesn't make sense "Lore-wise" but it makes sense "Fun-wise" for me.

Horus · Jul 08, 2008, 12:17 PM // 12:17

this would make it easier for players who "missed" legendary survivor and maybe made their character before that title was actually in game? As well wisdom and treasure hunter titles are pointless to be done on more than 1 character, not to mention how pointless it would be to max sunspear/lightbringer/asuran/norn/dwarven/vanguard titles on more than one characters :/ Imo these are they ones to be account wide

/ 1/2signed

Sjeng · Jul 08, 2008, 12:25 PM // 12:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by N1ghtstalker

/notsigned imo
the only account wide titles should be wisdom and treasure
that's it

I agree. /notsigned for KoaBD account wide, /signed for these two. ^

I wouldn't mind party animal / sweet tooth / drunkard being account wide, so you could use these items on all your characters and not just on one. Kinda sucks to always have to show up at parties with the same character, and that none of my other chars can benefit from drunkenness with dwarven PvE skills. But most of all I hate the fact that opening chests is spread out, and that my main has to ID every gold thing my other toons find.

Shadowhaze · Jul 08, 2008, 12:32 PM // 12:32

More account wide titles would be nice. But then I like playing more than one char.

Abedeus · Jul 08, 2008, 12:32 PM // 12:32

/signed grind/buyable titles like Drunkard, Sweet Tooth, EotN and NF titles account-wide.
/unsigned account-wide KoaBD.

Solas · Jul 08, 2008, 01:02 PM // 13:02

/signed i dont see why not
it'd allow peopel without survivor to attain it.

Kattar · Jul 08, 2008, 01:07 PM // 13:07

Quote:

/signed grind/buyable titles like Drunkard, Sweet Tooth, EotN and NF titles account-wide.
/unsigned account-wide KoaBD.

Exactly. Grindable titles, yes. KoaBD, no.

Ewon · Jul 08, 2008, 01:19 PM // 13:19

Let's just make everything attainable for everyone. In fact while were at it, lets just give everyone the title, that'd be cool right?

If you want the KoaBD title, then work for it. At the moment it is at least a little bit of an accomplishment for PvE'er. No need to make it easier.

Quote:

/signed i dont see why not
it'd allow peopel without survivor to attain it.

you don't need survivor (or LDoA)

/notsigned

Awex Mafyews · Jul 08, 2008, 01:28 PM // 13:28

Same as everyone else really. KoaBD shouldn't be account wide as it wouldnt be earned by every character. Titles like Drunkard/Sweet tooth/Party animal/Wisdom/Treasure Hunter should be although i dissagree that grindable titles such as SS/LB and EotN rep points should be account wide as they would allow characters benefits that they had not really earned.

/signed buyable titles /not signed KoaBD and Grindable titles

okey86 · Jul 08, 2008, 01:31 PM // 13:31

sorry totally disagree. i have made rank 6 KoaBD and i would hate to see it go account wide. those who do want it to go account wide are just lazy and dont want to put the effort in. it took me a long time to get rank 6 and having this title proves that. if u made it account wide and jsut created 8 chars and maxed the 3 protector titles thats just lame, the KoaBD title track would be worthless. I also disagree with making the gind titles account based. its not hard to put all ur golds in storage as u get them and then id them on ur main char, thats what i did. wisdom/drunkard etc are achievements that should not be watered down by allowing 8 chars to work on it. the only thing id like to see happen is the creation of an emote for the KoaBD title. similar to the fame and zrank titles. they are both pvp based emotes and its about time that there was a pve emote so those who are majority pve can show off thier acievements in the same manner that the pvp people do

Ate of DK · Jul 08, 2008, 02:04 PM // 14:04

/not signed.

This is just fine as it it.

Enix · Jul 08, 2008, 03:27 PM // 15:27

What about a compromise?

*All "grind" titles should be account wide (Wisdom, Treasure, EoTN Reps, SS/LB, Sweet Tooth, Drunkard, etc).

*All Campaign-specific titles should not (Vanquisher, Cartographer, Protector, Master of the North).

The way it is now is somewhat silly for players who have many secondary charecters.

Skill > Time?

/kindasigned