View Poll Results: Should the July MAT be replayed
|
Yeah, sure
|
|
97 |
65.54% |
No way
|
|
51 |
34.46% |
Jul 27, 2008, 08:26 PM // 20:26
|
#21
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Guild: Ray
|
of course it should but it won't happen. I highly doubt we'll even get any response from Anet to this, let alone an apology.
|
|
|
Jul 28, 2008, 06:42 AM // 06:42
|
#22
|
Hall Hero
Join Date: Aug 2005
Profession: E/
|
I'm REALLY surprised by the amount of negative (as in attitude, not answers to the poll) responses to this.
Sure A.net has screwed up a LOT of things lately (balancing, GW:EN in general, lack of public relations), but...
a) its not a workday, the last time they had server issues it was a weekend and the same thing happened, nothing was really fixed till Monday. While it is upsetting, you can't be surprised that 10-15 people won't come in on their day off.
b) do you people honestly think a.net won't redo the MAT? The whole "that would make sense so of course A.net won't do it" arguement isn't exactly valid (by definition it is an illogical arguement). If they were willing to have a "dragon festival redux" event a year ago, I don't see why they won't redo the mat.
Oh, and yes the guy decided to have double HB weekend on a MAT weekend should also be fired (the game wide lag was bad enough, but this made things even worse).
Voted yes of course.
I'm surprised how many people have voted no. Probablly people who either a) did well in the xulai house and don't want to lose their keys b) did well in the Mats (really good accomplishment beating dced opponents) c) have no idea what we are talking about or d) are just trolling to screw up the results (my big problem with sardalaic polls)
If you voted no and have a valid reason to explain to me besides the selfish ones I just listed, we'd all like to hear it.
Last edited by HawkofStorms; Jul 28, 2008 at 06:45 AM // 06:45..
|
|
|
Jul 28, 2008, 01:31 PM // 13:31
|
#23
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Guild: Ray
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkofStorms
If you voted no and have a valid reason to explain to me besides the selfish ones I just listed, we'd all like to hear it.
|
I bet all the people that voted no are pve'rs that go against any pvp related proposal because it's a pvp related proposal.
As to the rest of your post, it's not the lag we are complaining about. Lag happens, of course they didn't mean for that to happen. We are complaining that Anet doesn't even apologize for what happened.
|
|
|
Jul 28, 2008, 07:34 PM // 19:34
|
#24
|
I like yumy food!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where I can eat yumy food
Guild: Dead Alley [dR]
Profession: Mo/R
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arkantos
Is Divine pissed at ANet for doing a bad job even though it was pretty predictable? Yes.
<3 u
|
Yes. I had sup at #2. If swiss games weren't messed up, they wouldn't have faced rawr until later probably and got further than top 8.
Doesn't mean you're not terrible at PvE though! Don't change the subject
|
|
|
Jul 28, 2008, 08:08 PM // 20:08
|
#25
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkofStorms
If you voted no and have a valid reason to explain to me besides the selfish ones I just listed, we'd all like to hear it.
|
i voted no because lulz gw lulz
|
|
|
Jul 29, 2008, 05:11 AM // 05:11
|
#26
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon, USA.
Guild: Zero Mercy [zm]
Profession: W/
|
I got 100 reward points. I'm greedy. I voted no. :P
|
|
|
Jul 29, 2008, 09:56 AM // 09:56
|
#27
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2007
Profession: N/
|
they should, i mean, they redid some pve festival over because of lag, than why not this?
or is this yet another sign that Anet is stupid?
|
|
|
Jul 29, 2008, 10:00 AM // 10:00
|
#28
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Jun 2005
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tamuril elansar
or is this yet another sign that Anet is stupid?
|
No need to put that in a question, Anet is stupid.
|
|
|
Jul 29, 2008, 12:49 PM // 12:49
|
#29
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Profession: W/
|
THE MITCH IS BACK FOR GOLD
BTW~ I voted no. If anything, they should make August mAT earlier than normal.
|
|
|
Jul 29, 2008, 05:36 PM // 17:36
|
#30
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Jun 2006
Guild: Guildless, pm me
Profession: R/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sai Rith
BTW~ I voted no. If anything, they should make August mAT earlier than normal.
|
I would like to hear why that is.
|
|
|
Jul 29, 2008, 05:44 PM // 17:44
|
#31
|
Alcoholic From Yale
Join Date: Jul 2007
Guild: Strong Foreign Policy [sFp]
|
should they? yes
will they? no
did i /sign? obaby!
|
|
|
Jul 29, 2008, 05:50 PM // 17:50
|
#32
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Done.
Guild: [JUNK]
|
All the cool cats don't care about GW PvP.
/notsigned
|
|
|
Jul 29, 2008, 06:03 PM // 18:03
|
#33
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Feb 2008
Profession: Rt/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sai Rith
THE MITCH IS BACK FOR GOLD
BTW~ I voted no. If anything, they should make August mAT earlier than normal.
|
Y giving people less time to get the qps wld be another dum desicion by anet. just do the simplest and most logical and redo it
|
|
|
Aug 01, 2008, 12:35 PM // 12:35
|
#34
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: still lost
Guild: Guy In Real Life [GIRL]
Profession: Mo/
|
I miss Andrew Patrick and i almost start missing gaile grey
|
|
|
Aug 01, 2008, 03:36 PM // 15:36
|
#35
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Guild: Noble Order Of Valiant Angels
Profession: Me/
|
July's Monthly Automated Tournament Should Not Be Replayed
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkOfStorms
If you voted no and have a valid reason to explain to me besides the selfish ones I just listed, we'd all like to hear it.
|
Well, I, like the minority, have voted against this. Although I may be skinned alive, or totally ignored, here is my reason (this may turn into reasons if I can think up of something else...):
ArenaNet and NCSoft are NOT responsible for disconnects during the tournaments. It says so in their rules. So, if one person gets disconnected during a match, that means the match continues to go on and not called, unless one team forfeits the match. Even if the disconnect is server-side, ArenaNet and NCSoft cannot be responsible for it. The players participating in the tournaments have agreed to those terms when they decided to play the game, even if they haven't read them. I know most of you people haven't read them because you're complaining about it!
As for the "Dragon Festival Redux" period, even though I'm glad they did it (I actually just got Factions around that time), they didn't HAVE to do it, either, but they did anyway.
Seriously, look at this page and scroll down to "Connectivity". It's about a third of the way down. You'll find the exact message:
Quote:
Due to the nature of computers and the Internet, ArenaNet is not responsible for the results of any disconnection or network problems experienced by players.
|
I honestly don't see how it can be any clearer than this. I honestly can't. So, no, it should not be replayed.
If you actually read through this, thank you for your time.
Last edited by JupiterStarWarrior; Aug 01, 2008 at 03:45 PM // 15:45..
|
|
|
Aug 01, 2008, 04:10 PM // 16:10
|
#36
|
Emo Goth Italics
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lykan
Pretty much /thread right there.
|
I agree with this sentiment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JupiterStarWarrior
ArenaNet and NCSoft are NOT responsible for disconnects during the tournaments. It says so in their rules. So, if one person gets disconnected during a match, that means the match continues to go on and not called, unless one team forfeits the match. Even if the disconnect is server-side, ArenaNet and NCSoft cannot be responsible for it. The players participating in the tournaments have agreed to those terms when they decided to play the game, even if they haven't read them. I know most of you people haven't read them because you're complaining about it!
|
One person? How about entire teams? How about 15 disconnections on both sides? How about nobody connecting at all?
That is beyond stupidity, and there is no reason they shouldn't do a rollback. The least they could do is simply say something about the situation.
|
|
|
Aug 01, 2008, 04:13 PM // 16:13
|
#37
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2007
Guild: Relentless Aggressors [rA]
Profession: R/Mo
|
I don't agree with JupiterStarWarrior because some matches, entire teams didn't load, and it wouldn't count as a win OR a loss. Some teams finished 2-1 (pd) after playing every swiss round.
|
|
|
Aug 01, 2008, 04:20 PM // 16:20
|
#38
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ireland
Guild: Currently LF Active HA Guild, Glad 2, Comm.3, R2
Profession: E/
|
meh, For a proper tournament they really should do a redux.
/signed for fairness
if i get to repick for the xunui house then easily signed (modem failure so i couldnt make my pick).
|
|
|
Aug 01, 2008, 05:16 PM // 17:16
|
#39
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Jun 2006
Guild: Guildless, pm me
Profession: R/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JupiterStarWarrior
ArenaNet and NCSoft are NOT responsible for disconnects during the tournaments. It says so in their rules. So, if one person gets disconnected during a match, that means the match continues to go on and not called, unless one team forfeits the match. Even if the disconnect is server-side, ArenaNet and NCSoft cannot be responsible for it. The players participating in the tournaments have agreed to those terms when they decided to play the game, even if they haven't read them. I know most of you people haven't read them because you're complaining about it!
As for the "Dragon Festival Redux" period, even though I'm glad they did it (I actually just got Factions around that time), they didn't HAVE to do it, either, but they did anyway.
|
OK, so I see what you're saying, that dc's and error's are not liable to Anet. But, seeing as it was obviously server-side, what I would want at least is an explanation from Anet as to what happened.
Also, they did it for the Dragon Festival, they didn't HAVE to do it. So, why do PvE events get more support than PvP events?
|
|
|
Aug 01, 2008, 05:46 PM // 17:46
|
#40
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scotland
Guild: Type like an idiot, I'll treat you like an idiot
Profession: E/Me
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanyatta
So, why do PvE events get more support than PvP events?
|
Larger fanbase, catering to more customers and keeping the sheep happy to flock to GW2 when the time comes.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:52 PM // 14:52.
|