Jan 07, 2009, 05:47 AM // 05:47
|
#1
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New York
Profession: W/R
|
I Am Legend Title
New Title: I Am Legend:
Acquire Legendary Skill Hunter, Legendary Guardian and Legendary Vanquisher titles on an account.
What do you think of this?
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 05:54 AM // 05:54
|
#2
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: Team Apathy [aFk]
Profession: W/P
|
/signed only for the reason that i would finally make a black character to fit with this.
but for serious, /notsigned, don't need moar pointless titles.
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 05:54 AM // 05:54
|
#3
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormDragonZ
New Title: I Am Legend:
Acquire Legendary Skill Hunter, Legendary Guardian and Legendary Vanquisher titles on an account.
What do you think of this?
|
It's called People Know Me.
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 06:18 AM // 06:18
|
#4
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: In my own mind
Guild: The Dragon Exchange
Profession: E/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormDragonZ
New Title: I Am Legend:
Acquire Legendary Skill Hunter, Legendary Guardian and Legendary Vanquisher titles on an account.
What do you think of this?
|
Maybe if you make it:
Legendary Cartographer
Legendary Guardian
Legendary Vanquisher
Legendary Skill Hunter
Legendary Spearmarshal
Legendary Master of the north
Legendary Defender of Ascalon
then i still would /unsigned
Now if you made it
Legendary Cartographer
Legendary Guardian
Legendary Vanquisher
Legendary Skill Hunter
Legendary Spearmarshal
Legendary Master of the north
Legendary Defender of Ascalon
Legendary Gladiator
Legendary Hero
Legendary Champion
Legendary Hero of the Zaishen
then i would /sign
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 06:25 AM // 06:25
|
#5
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Jun 2008
Guild: The Cape Is A Lie[Trim]
Profession: W/E
|
/sign it's a nice idea
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 06:28 AM // 06:28
|
#6
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Slovenia
Guild: Scars Meadows [SMS]
Profession: Mo/
|
More titles for no work? Hell no.
The only 2 titles I would /sign now are do-all-quests title and r7 of KOABD.
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 06:29 AM // 06:29
|
#7
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: みやき町
Profession: Mo/A
|
/Notsigned
The titles aren't catastrophicly hard to obtain, and most, if not all players with "I Have Many Leather-Bound Books" usually have at least 90% of the titles maxed already. Skill hunter = money sink, Guardian = easy title tbh, the only "hard" title would be the vanquisher, since you gotta spend a bit of time grinding.
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 06:36 AM // 06:36
|
#8
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Apr 2005
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MirkoTeran
More titles for no work? Hell no.
The only 2 titles I would /sign now are do-all-quests title and r7 of KOABD.
|
this
I wouldn't bitch if that one was available for all vanq, skill, guardian, master of the north and all eotn rep titles, but as said before, it already exists...KOABD. R7 KOABD if they implement it could be I Am Legend though. I'd go for that.
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 06:40 AM // 06:40
|
#9
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: =VX9=
Profession: N/Mo
|
only title that i will /sign for is a quest title.
other wise NO MORE TITLES!
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 06:42 AM // 06:42
|
#10
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Guild: [eF]
Profession: Mo/
|
If there was a new title, it should be the completion of every elite area (urgoz, fow, uw, ect)
think theres 7 including glints quests.
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 07:08 AM // 07:08
|
#11
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Guild: Enraged Whiny Carebears [oR]
Profession: W/E
|
why would you even make this topic.
knowing what guru is like, knowing everyone gives textbook answers that closely follow the trend set by all the pretentious posters to fit in, add in a bunch of 4chan lingo and there's all your replies right there.
meanwhile threads that are original and out-of-the-box get closed daily. i don't get this place it's like a joke i'm just waiting for it to become funny. sigh.
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 09:50 AM // 09:50
|
#12
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Guild: Haze of Light [pure]
Profession: R/
|
What about legendary cartography? Im hoping you forgot it lol. Otherwise nty...
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 10:20 AM // 10:20
|
#13
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Serbia
Profession: Me/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormDragonZ
New Title: I Am Legend:
Acquire Legendary Skill Hunter, Legendary Guardian and Legendary Vanquisher titles on an account.
What do you think of this?
|
/signed , if this is implemented and I decide to farm titles at least I'll get one free
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 10:32 AM // 10:32
|
#14
|
Grotto Attendant
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Guild: Limburgse Jagers [LJ]
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormDragonZ
New Title: I Am Legend:
Acquire Legendary Skill Hunter, Legendary Guardian and Legendary Vanquisher titles on an account.
|
Should be called We Are Legend.
Either way, /notsigned for any more of those free titles. Legendary Skill, Guardian and Vanq are already free in itself, why would you give yet another bonus?
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 11:32 AM // 11:32
|
#15
|
Ooo, pretty flower
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Citadel of the Decayed
Guild: The Archivists' Sanctum [Lore]
Profession: N/
|
Add a r7 to KoaBD, title it "The Legend of <character name> (7)" if possible, if not title it "The Legend (7)" - would still fit with Anchorman and gives an even harder target.
29 non-account based titles. (two are mutually exclusive and are not usually on title characters *survivor and LDoA* so I did not include)
4 account based, non-PvP (not really PvE titles either anymore) titles.
3 account based, PvX titles.
5 account based, PvP titles.
If you go with full non-PvP titles, you only get 33, which forces you to get 2 more, most common choices would probably be Kurzick, Luxon, and/or Zaishen. But aside from those, there would only be PvP titles left.
Forcing PvP titles to count for maxing KoaBD would give a little more life into PvP, since people complain that PvP is dead/pointless.
I personally would redo the whole title system, making them similar to Master of the North than what we got. I would set it up like:
Legendary Master
Legendary Master of Tyria(includes Protector, Guardian, Vanquisher, and Cartographer of Tyria - these titles are removed and points are given to "MoT." Also add points for quests done *retroactive*) Legendary Master of Cantha(includes Protector, Guardian, Vanquisher, and Cartographer of Cantha - these titles are removed and points are given to "MoC." Also add points for quests done *retroactive*) Legendary Master of Elona(includes Protector, Guardian, Vanquisher, and Cartographer of Elona - these titles are removed and points are given to "MoE." Also add points for quests done *retroactive*) Legendary Master of the North(add points for quests done, change ranking points and/or points given accordingly to make it so you have to do everything to get (not able to get 31 points over what is needed) Legendary Skill Hunter (keep as now)
Legendary Defender of Ascalon (change to a similar system as the Master titles - quests, exploration, "normal vanquishing" and levels being the point system. *Normal Vanquishing would be something on Pre only, no icon to show this - no icon is for the difficulty - but you can Vanquish areas and doing so would give you points.* This now makes LDoA viable to work with Survivor. You would have to be level 10 or 15 *haven't decided* in order to get LDoA with this change.)
Legendary Party Goer(Name can change, couldn't think of something that was not used in Party Animal - basically same concept for name, but on a larger scale) Drunkard(change to point system and/or add icon to show level of drunkness to all ales *like how it is done for Bottles of Grog*) Sweet Tooth(no change) Party Animal(no change) Going with this system allows people without all campaigns to get the legendary titles (aside from skill hunter). 15 titles are removed, then 5 new titles are put in. This would also make getting GWAMM harder as instead of 29 titles, you have 19 titles that are character based - forcing those going for GWAMM to get 11 account based titles, which means all but one title (assuming no Survivor or LDoA).
Changing to this system would also allow space for adding a few more titles without making GWAMM too easy.
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 11:43 AM // 11:43
|
#16
|
Banned
|
why do people feel the need for more e-pen?
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 12:59 PM // 12:59
|
#18
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Malta
Guild: [CuTe]
Profession: E/
|
GWAMM is already easily obtainable nowadays and I personally see no reason to add more titles than we already have.
/notsigned
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 01:22 PM // 13:22
|
#19
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Oct 2007
Guild: Heroes of Elonia [HE]
Profession: W/Rt
|
This is a bad idea.
|
|
|
Jan 07, 2009, 01:43 PM // 13:43
|
#20
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Our Crabs Know True [LOVE]
Profession: R/
|
Might as well add several new titles in based off of popular movies!
Have a female character with elite armor and you get the title: Pretty Woman
Have a Ranger charm all possible pets and get the title: Doctor Dolittle
Have a character CRAFT all possible consumables and get the title: Flubber
Have a character complete all dungeons and elite areas (Tombs, UW, FoW, etc.) and get the title: Indiana Jones
You can pick virtually any movie and find a way to make the title out of it. What is the point? An easy free title. We don't need them, there are enough titles out there, and enough of them are easy to get. We don't need more.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:23 PM // 12:23.
|