 |
|
Aug 09, 2009, 07:08 PM // 19:08
|
#21 |
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Outside
Guild: Balthazars Chosen [BC]
Profession: R/P
|
Ok, maybe not Mysterious tonic, but what about an EL Zaishen tonic?
Or the EL mysterious tonic would exclude all forms previously in a tonic already? |
|
|
|
Aug 09, 2009, 07:24 PM // 19:24
|
#22 |
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maryland, US
Guild: Dark Knights of King Thorn [Mad]
Profession: Rt/
|
I think maybe a zaishen tonic and perhaps a mysterious tonic that has new forms but I wouldn;t personally own either.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 09, 2009, 07:27 PM // 19:27
|
#23 | |
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Apr 2005
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Tonics are useless to begin with. Why not do this? |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:26 AM // 09:26.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("