Curse

king swift · Feb 18, 2010, 09:40 PM // 21:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grim Aragorn

go go bigger epeen

/notsigned

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

End · Feb 18, 2010, 09:41 PM // 21:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by DigitalFear

Why? Just to show off even more?
/notsigned.

/notsigned because theres no real need for it

MisterB · Feb 18, 2010, 10:37 PM // 22:37

I don't like clutter. Rather than multiple titles displayed under your character, I'd prefer alternating the titles at a fixed interval, say 2-3 seconds. Allow the user to select the titles to alternate, and it essentially automates the manual display that is possible now.

People who want to see your titles can ask you to display them, so I don't see this as a high priority.

Pony Slaystation · Feb 18, 2010, 10:39 PM // 22:39

/notsigned

We don't need yet another way to show off and make people's epeen bigger.

Trader of Secrets · Feb 18, 2010, 10:43 PM // 22:43

I wouldnt look at people's titles anyways, besides it just takes up more of my view as my mouse hovers over everyone.

/notsigned

Turbo Ginsu · Feb 18, 2010, 10:44 PM // 22:44

Irritating enough as it is that your title's effect's don't auto-apply, this is just screen clutter, epeen waggle and a touch of laziness.
/notsigned.

vBeryl · Feb 18, 2010, 10:45 PM // 22:45

/notsigned

Is there even a reason to explain why I don't want it?

Hyperventilate · Feb 18, 2010, 11:10 PM // 23:10

There are enough ways to flaunt epeen in this game, why give them another one?

/notsigned.

Lord Dagon · Feb 19, 2010, 01:08 AM // 01:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterB

I don't like clutter. Rather than multiple titles displayed under your character, I'd prefer alternating the titles at a fixed interval, say 2-3 seconds. Allow the user to select the titles to alternate, and it essentially automates the manual display that is possible now.

People who want to see your titles can ask you to display them, so I don't see this as a high priority.

if they did anything id want to do this. 2~3 more titles for EA person jsut seems a bad idea.

/notsigned for OP's suggestion
/signed kind of halfheartedly on Mister B's idea(id vote this if anything)

Turbo Ginsu · Feb 19, 2010, 01:20 AM // 01:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tobi Madera

/signed kind of halfheartedly on Mister B's idea(id vote this if anything)

I can see the logic in this particular perspective. Especially given that you find destroyers in more EoTN areas than just Deldrimor. Dunno if that alone is worth making the changes for, but it'd certainly remove that one particular bit of title juggling..Perhaps it'd be viable if the epeen factor were removed by default to title-1 in towns and outposts, as you can't see them in explorables anyway.

I'd probably sign for that.

NeHoMaR · Feb 19, 2010, 01:59 AM // 01:59

There are plenty clear reasons of signing this, just showing more tittles.

The not signing "reasons" make no sense at all. They are just repeating exactly the same complains about the titles existence; it's just anti-title people invading my thread. I suggest you (not signing people) to make your own suggestion thread about removing the titles completely; so I can go and not sign without explain a thing.

ightgg · Feb 19, 2010, 02:03 AM // 02:03

Yes anet obviously needs to make pve easier by letting 2 titles such as asuran/delver be active at the same time and give you both affects. Im sure pve isnt already easy enough without environmental bonus'es too? Isnt that why DoA has environmental hinders? To make an already simple Pve actually somewhat of a challenge?
/notsigned
/petitioned against

NeHoMaR · Feb 19, 2010, 02:08 AM // 02:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dont Cause Drama

Yes anet obviously needs to make pve easier by letting 2 titles such as asuran/delver be active at the same time and give you both affects. Im sure pve isnt already easy enough without environmental bonus'es too? Isnt that why DoA has environmental hinders? To make an already simple Pve actually somewhat of a challenge?
/notsigned
/petitioned against

Well, if you carefully read my post, you can easily spot there are no suggestion about added bonus or whatever thing you are saying, that's just added speculation, so more people can make more no sense not signs.

**Marty Silverblade** · Feb 19, 2010, 02:19 AM // 02:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeHoMaR

Well, if you carefully read my post, you can easily spot there are no suggestion about added bonus or whatever thing you are saying, that's just added speculation, so more people can make more no sense not signs.

If you carefully read other peoples posts you would realise that you could display numerous titles at once and get all their bonuses. They aren't making them up just so they can /notsign your thread.

Anyway, /notsigned, because:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ugh

The only reason for this is e-peen.

This would cause unnecessary annoyances by crowding the screen.

Two is a weird number for something like this.

Switching titles is too simple and fast for anyone to consider it an actual inconvenience.

This could cause abuse in some areas.

Anet could prevent that abuse, but it isn't worth their time or effort

Turbo Ginsu · Feb 19, 2010, 02:50 AM // 02:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dont Cause Drama

Yes anet obviously needs to make pve easier by letting 2 titles such as asuran/delver be active at the same time and give you both affects. Im sure pve isnt already easy enough without environmental bonus'es too? Isnt that why DoA has environmental hinders? To make an already simple Pve actually somewhat of a challenge?
/notsigned
/petitioned against

Seriously dude..You seem as annoying as Easy was..DoA area effects are not extra difficulty, they're extra annoyance. Likewise, popping up a title menu and swapping before a mob isn't difficult, just annoying..Though I suppose you're right, expecting GW free of annoying things is a bit silly isn't it?

Ugh · Feb 19, 2010, 03:03 AM // 03:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeHoMaR

There are plenty clear reasons of signing this, just showing more tittles.

That's only one reason.

Quote:

The not signing "reasons" make no sense at all.

Allow me to explain...

"The only reason for this is e-peen"
This means that this suggestion has no practical use and would only exist to make showing off twice as efficient.

"This would cause unnecessary annoyances by crowding the screen"
This means that I don't want to be forced to sift through even bigger walls of text everytime I try to find the storage chest in Kamadan.

"Two is a weird number for something like this"
It just is. Seriously, two titles? Why TWO titles? It's an awkward number. One title makes sense. And, if you're going to have more than one, you might as well just go for three instead of half-assing it. But three would be even worse than two, so let's just keep it at one.

"Switching titles is too simple and fast for anyone to consider it an actual inconvenience"
It takes about three seconds, two presses of the H key and a click. If you're unlucky, you might have to drag that little bar on the side.

"This could cause abuse in some areas"
Whoever brought this up explained it already. In case you forgot, his or her example was something about fighting Destroyers in Asuran areas.

"Anet could prevent that abuse, but it isn't worth their time or effort"
They're short on manpower already. And implementing something unnecessary isn't really worth it, especially when it creates another problem, has disadvantages, and doesn't really have any benefits.

Quote:

They are just repeating exactly the same complains about the titles existence

Only the first reason could be misinterpreted like that. And most people aren't complaining about titles, they're saying that the title system is fine as it is.

Quote:

it's just anti-title people invading my thread.

No.

Quote:

I suggest you (not signing people) to make your own suggestion thread about removing the titles completely

No.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turbo Ginsu

Likewise, popping up a title menu and swapping before a mob isn't difficult, just annoying..Though I suppose you're right, expecting GW free of annoying things is a bit silly isn't it?

See above. Also, unless you restrict yourselves to only two areas and you never show any titles without effects, you would still have to do this.

The Drunkard · Feb 19, 2010, 03:55 AM // 03:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeHoMaR

My idea is quickly entering better teams in PvP (even with higher rank than mine) by showing another titles.

...How? If I'm going to form a team in HA, I'm not going to care if someone is r6 glad because I'm looking for people who have experience in HA. This idea will not make PuGs any better than they were before.

/notsigned

Turbo Ginsu · Feb 19, 2010, 06:11 AM // 06:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ugh

See above. Also, unless you restrict yourselves to only two areas and you never show any titles without effects, you would still have to do this.

Yeah see. Even with my twist, it's still of negligible enough use or benefit to bother with, I can see that yeah, the asura title benefit and destroyer-hatin' deldrimor titles stacking is just a bit too much overkill, verging on exploit..

superraptors · Feb 19, 2010, 01:54 PM // 13:54

pointless even tho some titles do matter to an extent in some formats of the game

showing off even though your still bad in the end will get you no where, from pvp perspective

no way

Dont Nerf The Perma · Feb 19, 2010, 03:01 PM // 15:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeHoMaR

There are plenty clear reasons of signing this, just showing more tittles.

The not signing "reasons" make no sense at all. They are just repeating exactly the same complains about the titles existence; it's just anti-title people invading my thread. I suggest you (not signing people) to make your own suggestion thread about removing the titles completely; so I can go and not sign without explain a thing.

Those "titles" are part of the reason PvP is dying a slow painful death.