Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > Sardelac Sanitarium

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Apr 08, 2011, 02:53 AM // 02:53   #21
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Fate Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pie-land
Guild: Warlords Of The Underworld [WoTU]
Profession: Mo/
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swingline View Post
Obviously you have not played RA enough.
A bit rude. g7 says otherwise.

Quote:
95% of RA is luck.
Then why are sync teams such a problem? why are you always stuck with 1/2 morons? You have serious players who want wins and will do so by synching. There are a bare minimum, especially nowadays, of serious players who will enter RA without a sync because they're stuck with non-serious/non-syncing morons, as you'd put it.

Quote:
The reason is players leave constantly even with a 15 minute debuff
In order to rejoin with their sync squadz.

Quote:
and there is nothing more anet can do with sync teams atm because of the format of the title points. The best option is make RA give 1 glad point per win. With 1 point per win all of the above becomes less painful.
This is not the best option at all. You're not thinking long term. Ok, GW is at the end of it's life cycle and Anet have already made it obvious they don't want to fix certain player needs/wants, but the best option is obviously to fix the player match up and truly make it random. It's rediculous to say that in order to fix something, make it less painful. Within 5 seconds of reading you go from explaining the best option to admitting it only supresses the pain. Did I miss that lesson in school where they said a bandage will fix a broken bone? I'd love for Anet to explain why their coding was so messed up for Random Arenas in the first place that they -in their attempt to fix the sync problem a few years back- simply made the order list worldwide and not by district. Epic. Because co-ordinating through the interwebs has never been done before....

Quote:
The way RA is now I should be getting lucky points for getting 5 consecutive matches.
Like i've said already, the only argument this proposal has is that players are not winning enough to get title points, so you think some points for pressing Enter Battle will make it more worthwhile. I'm sorry, but the syncers will still be there, and the morons will still be there, probably in greater numbers.

RA has always been PvP's dipping pool. Gladiator just shouldn't be taken so seriously anymore for those who aren't so feverishly addicted to ranking up. I still play RA now because I enjoy 4v4 gameplay (and because I'm actually good at it), but I'm not bothered by the necessity of the title track. Of course I want to win, but not to farm the title.
It's like with HA as well, anyone who enjoyed it back when WoTU was playing, we never checked how many points we had, we played to win. The title came with the winning.

Last edited by Fate Crusher; Apr 08, 2011 at 02:56 AM // 02:56..
Fate Crusher is offline  
Old Apr 08, 2011, 02:57 AM // 02:57   #22
Underworld Spelunker
 
MithranArkanere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: wikipedia.org/wiki/Vigo
Guild: Heraldos de la Llama Oscura [HLO]
Profession: E/
Default

I will only go back to RA if they make the matches completely random, with randomized teams in each fight, like the Costume Brawl, and each fight count, and count the same, without streaks.

One win one point. Period.

As it is now, you can win 80% of ALL the battles you have ever fought in RA, and still get 0 points, and those lucky enough to get a balanced team get streaks and lots of points, which is completely absurd in a place that is supposed to be random.

If anyone wants teams and more organized gameplay, they have HA or GvG.

Last edited by MithranArkanere; Apr 08, 2011 at 03:00 AM // 03:00..
MithranArkanere is offline  
Old Apr 08, 2011, 06:57 AM // 06:57   #23
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Guild: Anna
Profession: A/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere View Post
If anyone wants teams and more organized gameplay, they have HA or GvG.
Those formats are 8v8 though , it's not at all the same monking alone in 4v4 than healing in a format where there are 3 backline , bsurger/spiritspammer and epic linebackers....

But many here don't really understand the point of glad title. It was at first 10 wins because bars were fair at prophecies time , it wasn't like you got rolled in 5 sec when you had no monk... Thus even the most random team had chances to get some wins ,and furthermore , rank wasn't meaning much....

Really ,at that time you could go in with any bar and still win . Today if i want to have at least some chances to win , i either have to go in as bsurger , either as epic wiki stance monk..... so fun...

Syncers aren't that much a problem alone , they are if included in this terrible system... Most of times you finally end up having correct team after hours , of course you have to fight one of them on 6th consec.....
Missing HB is offline  
Old Apr 08, 2011, 07:49 AM // 07:49   #24
M3G
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Default

Teams in RA should be shuffled every round so that would make syncing only worth for 1st round and making RA truely random. But the downside is that it would be Luck Arena depending on who you are teamed with...
M3G is offline  
Old Apr 08, 2011, 09:15 AM // 09:15   #25
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: GMT+1
Profession: E/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Missing HB View Post
Syncers aren't that much a problem alone , they are if included in this terrible system... Most of times you finally end up having correct team after hours , of course you have to fight one of them on 6th consec.....
Pretty much this. Problem is, not everyone plays for hours, and even if they had the time, most people would stop doing RA and move to something else because of the win/loss ratio that's currently present in RA.

I think the current state of RA is broken, more because of the builds that are around than the syncers. Best I've gotten in two weeks is 18 wins, with a balanced team. We lost again a double derv spamming conds and their everlasting pressure.
I'm for a change in RA, through title/syncing/grouping. Any or all of these.

Also, most people in RA are trying to get r3 min just for the HoM, so yeah, as pointed out earlier, 90% of players are playing for the latters below they toon
Wannagotoheaven is offline  
Old Apr 08, 2011, 06:16 PM // 18:16   #26
Desert Nomad
 
reaper with no name's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Guild: FaZ
Profession: D/
Default

I don't care personally about the glad title, but that doesn't make it ok for there to be a title with no practical way to get that doesn't involve syncing.

/signed
reaper with no name is offline  
Old Apr 08, 2011, 06:23 PM // 18:23   #27
Wilds Pathfinder
 
clear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

I think the Glad title track is set up just fine. Most of the time I get paired with good team mates after a few tries. I only run into maybe one sync team a day and that is usually only one or two players that synced.
clear is offline  
Old Apr 08, 2011, 07:16 PM // 19:16   #28
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: GMT+1
Profession: E/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clear View Post
I only run into maybe one sync team a day and that is usually only one or two players that synced.
Hi, I'm one player, and Ima sync with myself.
Syncing is often done cross alliance (diff guild tags) so you might not know they are syncing
Wannagotoheaven is offline  
Old Apr 08, 2011, 09:52 PM // 21:52   #29
Krytan Explorer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tualatin OR
Guild: N/A
Profession: A/W
Default

I'd like a change to RA, but really, just add a new, better way for PvP. How about 5v5 TA? And add the Glad to that.

Problem with RA are "syncers", griefers, people testing their crap builds, and all that garbage. People don't care about their teammates.

I would like a point for a win though. That'd be nice. Wouldn't make the title easier, just... possible.
thedeadlyassassin is offline  
Old Apr 08, 2011, 10:04 PM // 22:04   #30
Jungle Guide
 
AndrewSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Italy, Turin
Guild: Lake
Profession: E/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedeadlyassassin View Post
I would like a point for a win though. That'd be nice. Wouldn't make the title easier, just... possible.
Agree with most has been said here about RA(even if i don't play so much pvp after it).
And if u make getting points faster/easier, just push up the amount of points needed for the ranks. Surely win streaks must be awarded, but now is just matter of luck/sync, and they're the only way to progress in this title atm.
AndrewSX is offline  
Old Apr 08, 2011, 10:43 PM // 22:43   #31
The Hotshot
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Honolulu
Guild: International District [id多]
Default

How is it any better that the title should be completely reflective of time spent grinding?
__________________

Interested in GvG? Want to watch some high-level PvP? Check out some streams and recordings!
lemming is0  
Old Apr 09, 2011, 01:10 AM // 01:10   #32
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Fate Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pie-land
Guild: Warlords Of The Underworld [WoTU]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming View Post
How is it any better that the title should be completely reflective of time spent grinding?
Because it then joins every other title.

It's pretty obvious that whoever wants to see the Gladiator title change to points-per-win, are wanting an easier approach on creeping up the title. Regardless of how difficult it becomes, as long as they "enter battle" they will always improve on their title.

Does anyone else see the flaw in this? Especially with Guild Wars being so intrinsically based on PvP gameplay, your proposed title is promoting none of that and just farming, essentially.
Fate Crusher is offline  
Old Apr 09, 2011, 01:22 AM // 01:22   #33
Furnace Stoker
 
Coast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Belgium
Guild: Whats Going On [sup]
Profession: Mo/
Default

red resign all over again, lol
Coast is offline  
Old Apr 09, 2011, 04:34 AM // 04:34   #34
Krytan Explorer
 
Pugs Not Drugs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fate Crusher View Post
Does anyone else see the flaw in this? Especially with Guild Wars being so intrinsically based on PvP gameplay, your proposed title is promoting none of that and just farming, essentially.
Maxing or even getting a high rank in any pvp title right now is basically farming. in order to get a decent rank in any pvp title, you pretty much have to abuse the gimmicky build of the month over and over again to see progress. you could make that argument for the pvp titles in place right now. pretty much any title in this game, in fact, can only be maxed with farming over and over again


Quote:
Originally Posted by Coast View Post
red resign all over again, lol
what? that makes no sense

a. red resign wasnt for the title, it was for zkeys
b. its alot harder to get 4 red people to resign than 1
Pugs Not Drugs is offline  
Old Apr 09, 2011, 04:41 AM // 04:41   #35
yum
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Profession: W/E
Default

Gladiator title track:

You gain 1 point every time you enter Random Arena.

Happy nao?
yum is offline  
Old Apr 09, 2011, 04:49 AM // 04:49   #36
Krytan Explorer
 
GWfan#1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Guild: My Character Liked Gwen [First]
Profession: R/
Default

Has it ever been suggested that in RA every team is Random? Even if you win your next match will be with different teammates.

I think they did that with the most recent costume battles.
GWfan#1 is offline  
Old Apr 09, 2011, 04:50 AM // 04:50   #37
Administrator
 
Marty Silverblade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugs Not Drugs View Post
what? that makes no sense

a. red resign wasnt for the title, it was for zkeys
b. its alot harder to get 4 red people to resign than 1
How does that make no sense?

a) You can still rr balth faction on RA Zquest days. The quest is repeatable.
b) I'm sure a lot more people will be playing to resign if this is implemented. Remember you need a PvP title for the HoM, and it's worth 3 points. A point per win will quite possible make rr'ing the preferred option of PvP title for PvEers.
__________________
Marty Silverblade is0  
Old Apr 09, 2011, 05:04 AM // 05:04   #38
Krytan Explorer
 
Pugs Not Drugs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty Silverblade View Post
How does that make no sense?

a) You can still rr balth faction on RA Zquest days. The quest is repeatable.
b) I'm sure a lot more people will be playing to resign if this is implemented. Remember you need a PvP title for the HoM, and it's worth 3 points. A point per win will quite possible make rr'ing the preferred option of PvP title for PvEers.
a) i dont see how that is relevant to changing the title. that is possible right now.



b)if the title was changed, i still dont see four people resigning for no reason. its not like everyone that plays ra does it for the title.

you would need to win 2000 matche in order to get r3 glad if the title was revamped. that theoretically means entering 4000 matches.

if you spent that time farming anything, pretty much, you would have way more than enough for the zaishen statue. besides, most people going for 50/50 can afford the zaishen statue already
Pugs Not Drugs is offline  
Old Apr 09, 2011, 07:29 AM // 07:29   #39
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Guild: Anna
Profession: A/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty Silverblade View Post
How does that make no sense?

a) You can still rr balth faction on RA Zquest days. The quest is repeatable.
b) I'm sure a lot more people will be playing to resign if this is implemented. Remember you need a PvP title for the HoM, and it's worth 3 points. A point per win will quite possible make rr'ing the preferred option of PvP title for PvEers.
That makes no sense yes. You need 4 other players to be convinced of resigning , so that means 12 players to have a quest completed , which gives you 3000 factions.....
Red resign in HB was 6000 points , so that's equivalent to convincing 24 players of resigning... not that easy.... especially when opponent team has monk and you don't....

By the way , arguments you give to RR in RA can apply too on GvG quest , unfortunately not that many people do it ....
Missing HB is offline  
Old Apr 09, 2011, 11:48 AM // 11:48   #40
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Fate Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pie-land
Guild: Warlords Of The Underworld [WoTU]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugs Not Drugs View Post
Maxing or even getting a high rank in any pvp title right now is basically farming. in order to get a decent rank in any pvp title, you pretty much have to abuse the gimmicky build of the month over and over again to see progress. you could make that argument for the pvp titles in place right now. pretty much any title in this game, in fact, can only be maxed with farming over and over again
Excuse me, but have you ever done high-end pvp?

Albeit, Champion has seen better days and people have been banned for ladder manipulation, but the only way to achieve the higher ranks you need a good run of winning streaks, i.e. your win/loss ratio.

And then for HA, the only way to possibly attain r12 or higher is to get very good consecutive wins. The underpopulated HA that it is now will see you always skipping maps meaning you miss out on the fame multiplication. A full run where you don't skip a single map leading up to Halls is considered a good run. You end up in Halls with a 4 fame win and forced to only play a match every 12 minutes, which isn't effective enough at all. And as blue and with the morons running around nowadays, unless it's koth, you will not be holding for long.

So I hope this makes sense to you. Your "revamp" Gladiator is giving players a guaranteed ride up the title track with no difficulty curve whatsoever. Also known as farming.
Fate Crusher is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 AM // 04:06.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("