Curse

generik · May 30, 2006, 08:29 AM // 08:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russell.Crowe

The name of the game is GUILD Wars, not FARM Wars. Therefore, the point of the game is not to farm greens. If farming for greens is what you are about, you must be very bored.

What else is Guild Wars about? If it is all for the Fedex quests your mind must be simple enough to be occupied by something real trivial!

Matsumi · May 30, 2006, 08:33 AM // 08:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by strcpy

Umm, should be fairly obvious who it was directed at, only one person was reading "We don't mind farming, we just want to stop bots and stop farming methods that destroy the economy" to mean "OMG we hate farming - NERF NERF NERF to stop it!".

Due to some of thier comments, I got the impression that particular individual was an early 55'r (and other exploits, bugs or just unforseen combinations that were too powerful, current 55'ing doesn't doesn't fall into that category) and is ticked they can not make insane amounts of money anymore so they are irrationally rageing away and nothing will even remtoely change thier minds, and thus they had drunk the kool-aid.

You seem to, at the very least, agree with that assessment somewhat - at least the irrational reading of what Anet said.

Oh, ok sorry... for a moment there I wasn't sure who you were referring to.

Lasareth · May 30, 2006, 08:42 AM // 08:42

Alright, this thread has delved into its fair share of speculation, semantics, and random argument. While it may be pertinent to some to question motive of the designers or purpose of the game, this thread is unraveling into a mess of multiple arguments, unnecessary jabs, and a lack of constructive focus or development. Since each person interprets some of the quoted material in a different manner, arguing on intent of the developers through their words will not bring either a definitive or constructive resolution to the argument. Likewise, the arguments going on here are based on these interpretations and are based upon their interpreter's ideas and beliefs.

Therefore, I would suggest that each user read information released by anet representatives and interpret it as he or she sees fit. Discussing alternatives to the system, or improvements to it, is constructive, but this is not.