Curse

waingro · Nov 17, 2006, 11:13 PM // 23:13

Does anyone else not like how is not all used it shouldn't have any boundries!

Astro Pubes · Nov 17, 2006, 11:17 PM // 23:17

um.. dude.. what are you talking about? from your post and title no one will be able to understand what you are talking about please be more specific as to which campaign you're refering too as well as a more in depth statement rather than the extremely vague quid you left us it'd be more helpful.

waingro · Nov 17, 2006, 11:25 PM // 23:25

i mean like when i started playing i thought the game was teh whole map but the boundries are so big you only use liek 40% of teh map in the games why make it like that why not map the whole worl usable look at it its so nice looking why box it up!

Gun Pierson · Nov 17, 2006, 11:26 PM // 23:26

Got used to it and have no problem with it.

exiled mat · Nov 17, 2006, 11:32 PM // 23:32

The question here is: How "balanced" would the maps be if anet had decided to use the full map.
I don't think anet could possible ever just fill out everything without rushing and creating glitches, which is why we get small but GOOD maps.
You will get an good inpression how big the actual map is if you play nigthfall till the end

(And Anet could create extra content in the future with all that "spare" spaces on the map

)

waingro · Nov 17, 2006, 11:34 PM // 23:34

it would be better you wouldn't get bored i bet if their was 100% map to explore and more land with boundries it doesn't even feel like a real world

exiled mat · Nov 17, 2006, 11:41 PM // 23:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by waingro

it would be better you wouldn't get bored i bet if their was 100% map to explore and more land with boundries it doesn't even feel like a real world

and it would take a lot of (mostly boring) time to complete the 100% explorer title

icedragon981 · Nov 18, 2006, 09:27 AM // 09:27

Well, first off, please use proper spelling and grammar, reading your posts was like trying to translate another language. And second,

Quote:

Originally Posted by exiled mat

The question here is: How "balanced" would the maps be if anet had decided to use the full map.
I don't think anet could possible ever just fill out everything without rushing and creating glitches, which is why we get small but GOOD maps.
You will get an good inpression how big the actual map is if you play nigthfall till the end

(And Anet could create extra content in the future with all that "spare" spaces on the map

)

QFT

Bankai · Nov 18, 2006, 10:42 AM // 10:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by waingro

it would be better you wouldn't get bored i bet if their was 100% map to explore and more land with boundries it doesn't even feel like a real world

Dude. You can't get everywhere in real life either, can't you? Have fun climbing mountains without walkable path. We're adventurers. We kill monsters. We're not climbing mountains.

By the way, there's a surprisingly big area between the desolation and Vabbi you can explore.

And as a final note, Anet tried to let you go about everywhere in prophecies. However, we got massive areas with 2 quests in it.