Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 22, 2006, 10:13 PM // 22:13   #1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default [Merged]Aspenwood Leeching/Concerns for x2 Faction Event/Leech Bot Speculation

Question I submitted to support.guildwars.com about this issue (introductions skipped):
Quote:
Originally Posted by me
Fort Aspenwood mission became plagued by people known as leechers. They join the game and after that do nothing. Some just stay at the spawn point, others trying to hide their character so their absence is less noticable. The purpose is obvious - they trying to get "free" faction points while not playing the game. Civil words can not describe my and other legimate players' frustration. Leechers are not only gain something in unfair way, but also indirectly make their team (players who actually trying to play the mission) fail. This problem becomes more serious every day as more players start using this tactic. Of all the games today my team ALWAYS had at least one leecher... sometimes two.

What I would like to know is your official stance on this issue.
1) Do you know about this?
2) Do you consider this a problem?
3) If yes, do you accept violation reports on this matter or consider fixing technical side of it?
Reply I got today:
Quote:
Originally Posted by GM Jabberwocky
At the present time there is little we can do to dissuade people who join groups and then go afk. If you find that this is becoming a serious problem, we highly encourage you to consider posting your experiences on one of many of the Guild Wars Fansite message boards. A compiled list can be found on the official Guild Wars web site at http://www.guildwars.com/community/fansites/. By posting on one of these message boards, other players can comment on your ideas, concerns, and suggestions, and Development Team members are able to catch up on what the community wants to see in Guild Wars. Fansite forums make it easy and efficient for us to learn from those playing the game.

While the forums are far more important for the purpose getting your frustrations to the developers, I also encourage you report suspected leechers to us (the Support team). The more reports we receive about particular form of violation, the more informed we will be about the depth of the problem within Guild Wars.

Thank you for your efforts in assisting us to make Guild Wars the best gaming experience possible.
Basically I translate this as
1) they don't even know about this problem (nor reading this forum)
2) they don't see it as problem
3) they not going to make adjustments to the mission. Submit report if you like, but unless 100+ people wasted thier breath on you nothing will be done.

Happy leeching everyone.


Edit: oops, this was meant to be in Riverside Inn.

---
Edit: Thread's fixed, ignore this edit.
-Mercury Angel

Last edited by Mercury Angel; Aug 17, 2006 at 03:18 PM // 15:18..
Ira Blinks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 02:04 AM // 02:04   #2
Desert Nomad
 
bilateralrope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Zealand
Guild: Xen Of Onslaught (Xen of the Pacific division)
Default

I read that as:

1 - We dont think its a big enough problem now, because there aren't enough people complaining.

2 - We currently have no idea how we can solve this

3 - Report all the leachers to us, if one person keeps comming up we might do something to him and we will also get a clearer picture of how many leachers there are.
bilateralrope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 02:36 AM // 02:36   #3
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Lepton CFd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Guild: Pantheon of Shadows [dei]
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

Hmm, I'm sure that they are aware of the problem. It seems like they haven't figured out a solution yet, and perhaps are hoping to find one of these fansite forums =P
Lepton CFd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 02:51 AM // 02:51   #4
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Phoenix Avenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Guild: Eternal Knights
Profession: E/Mo
Default

Wouldnt it be easy to just kick people out of the group who have not moved/used a skill for 5 mins? (or some other amount of time)
Phoenix Avenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 03:02 AM // 03:02   #5
The Greatest
 
Arkantos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix Avenger
Wouldnt it be easy to just kick people out of the group who have not moved/used a skill for 5 mins? (or some other amount of time)
This is a good idea, but some people probably just do something else on the computer while waiting for the mission to be done. They can easily start moving every 4 mins and totally avoid this problem. But yes, if they got kicked after 5 mins lots of the people who go afk are screwed.
Arkantos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 03:06 AM // 03:06   #6
Wilds Pathfinder
 
MoldyRiceFrenzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Guild: Confusion in The Ranks[tArD]
Profession: Mo/W
Default

arg this is probably gona end up being fort aspendwood screwed just like 12v12 was... they are probably gona make u pair up in 8 and no random groups... I'd rather have a couple leachers here and there than a friggin set up based map where i can't even communicate to my allies.
MoldyRiceFrenzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 03:12 AM // 03:12   #7
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Kidney Licker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Europe Server
Default

Currently if you don't participant in a battle you don't get any experience or item drops. It seems simple enough to extend this to factions too, though I haven't actually got far enough in the game yet to see how factions are allocated.
Kidney Licker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 03:37 AM // 03:37   #8
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Default

Welcome to ArenaNet. Post your complaints on a fan-forum, get flamed for "whining", then wait 4-6 months for something to happen.

Actually Kidney Licker, you do get experience for just sitting there being "afk." Trust me.
robrobrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 03:41 AM // 03:41   #9
The Greatest
 
Arkantos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robrobrob
Welcome to ArenaNet. Post your complaints on a fan-forum, get flamed for "whining", then wait 4-6 months for something to happen.

Actually Kidney Licker, you do get experience for just sitting there being "afk." Trust me.
1) Nobody flamed him
2) ANet comes on this forum
3) Ooh, your hinting you afk FF. your too cool
Arkantos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 03:47 AM // 03:47   #10
MCS
Banned
 
MCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

Leechers of all sorts suck, I'd love a vote kick feature to kick people who leech in missions. It wouldn't solve the problem immediatly but when people realize they get nothing by going AFK they'll simply stop.
__________________
I just wanted to see if I can do this. Leet.
MCS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 03:50 AM // 03:50   #11
Jungle Guide
 
Join Date: May 2005
Default

I seen bots trying to leech in missions as well.
Anet loves getting ppl to post in fan forums, knowing full well there will always be dissenters etc.

I wonder how much they actually save by not operating official forums.
MaglorD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 03:59 AM // 03:59   #12
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bloody Death
1) Nobody flamed him
2) ANet comes on this forum
3) Ooh, your hinting you afk FF. your too cool
1) If you think nobody on this forum flames, you must have joined yesterday.
2) Duh
3) ANet kept a broken system in place, they're even cooler.

Since my sarcasm was too much for you to understand, let me explain:

1) Welcome to how ArenaNet handles things. You have a complaint? They ask that you post it on a fansite forum. Nevermind you just sent them an e-mail clearly detailing the problem, they'd rather it be on a forum so they can say something like "Sorry, was busy and didn't quite catch that thread." Otherwise people would be correct in claiming that ArenaNet ignores issues sometimes.

Of course, if you're at all critical of the game, users here with the wool over their eyes will defend ArenaNet. This of course requires that they make vague attacks on you, the complainee, because you should know that ArenaNet is infallible, and the truth is that without ArenaNet providing Guild Wars, our sun would implode, our atmosphere would dissipate, and we would die a grotesque death. So instead of making critical comments, whether your comments are correct or not, you should instead be sacrificing your firstborn child to ArenaNet. They don't want you to, but the misguided fools on fansite forums do.

So, ArenaNet tells you to post on one of the forums. You do. And these loyal sheep flame you on sight, normally. Don't believe me? Look through this forum and Riverside.

2) I know ArenaNet visits these foums. I don't recall saying they didn't.

3) I wanted to see exactly how much faction sitting afk gets you. I've done it twice. Got 600 faction for a win, 160 faction for a loss. Decided that even afk'ing those garbage missions wasn't worth the effort to log in. Get off your pedestal boy.


There, hopefully you're a bit more clear on where I stand.

Thank you.
robrobrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 04:05 AM // 04:05   #13
The Greatest
 
Arkantos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robrobrob
1) If you think nobody on this forum flames, you must have joined yesterday.
My join date is Feb 2006. Do you think I joined yesterday? What I said was nobody flamed him. I never said nobody flames.
PS-Yes, I know you said that sarcastically.
Arkantos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 04:07 AM // 04:07   #14
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Default

You are correct, I mis-read that statement myself. I apologize.
robrobrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 04:40 AM // 04:40   #15
Jungle Guide
 
Isileth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Profession: R/W
Default

Leechers are a problem. One thing ive found a lot of people have said to me after ive pmed that about leeching is that they are doing pve only and dont want to be forced into pvp. Personally i agree. Although leeching isnt the right way to go about this problem. Forcing people that only want to pve into pvp is annoying. If its only a few fights then i guess thats ok you may as well give them a taste of the rest of the game and hope they like it. But 10k factions worth of games is a lot. And when the alternative is running the same mission over and over sitting afk suddenly starts to look mighty appealing. I was lucky in that members of my guild where running the supply mission so i teamed with them and we chatted while doing it so it was actually pretty fun. 10k is a big target to reach. When you get 200ish for losing and 600 for a win (not likely because these people dont want to pvp remember ) or 400 a run it can easily take several hours if not days to accumulate said ammount. Maybe drop the required ammount down a bit or give a pve alternative like killing 10 hard targets and getting 1k for each etc.
I do pvp, pve to me is the extra bit on the side but i did find it annoying that people are forced to farm faction. Farming is extremely boring imo. Sure the rewards may be great but some people just dont have time to do the same thing over and over which is when other games on your shelf start looking a good alternative. I dont think the realms of pvp and pve should be so close together.
Obviousely some of these people arent just trying to finish the storyline and are farming faction for guilds. But if you remove the need for pve players to leech it would be a lot easier to spot those who are trying to farm faction for guilds.
Isileth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 06:35 AM // 06:35   #16
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Guild: Knights of the Void
Profession: Mo/
Default

I hate the afk people! I am a PvE gal, but when I decide to do something, I DO it. I hate the idea that I have to do super repetative quests or PvP to get the faction required for a quest. At the same time though, whichever I choose, I will DO it. I won't sit around and say "I PvE so I won't move since I am forced to PvP," that is BS!

I have always thought that there should be a feature that allows the team to vote a member off while in mission. I don't think they should be kicked from the area so much as just not in the group anymore. Which would make them a hostile to each group or the group and monsters. That will teach them!
CorstedPirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 06:48 AM // 06:48   #17
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Moon
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ira Blinks
Basically I translate this as
1) they don't even know about this problem (nor reading this forum)
2) they don't see it as problem
3) they not going to make adjustments to the mission. Submit report if you like, but unless 100+ people wasted thier breath on you nothing will be done.

Happy leeching everyone.


Edit: oops, this was meant to be in Riverside Inn.
That reply was actually the generic bot-reply. Reply that reply with an url to some of the threads discussing leecher problem, a human will read it this time, and reply.


VVV- I think it's the 'ask a question' software NCsoft is using, that automatically sends a robot reply. When I played EVE online, they had the same system, and the same thing. First message was from a robot, and if you replied, you got a non-robot reply for your reply.

Last edited by Kaguya; May 23, 2006 at 07:17 AM // 07:17..
Kaguya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 07:14 AM // 07:14   #18
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Guild: Knights of the Void
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaguya
That reply was actually the generic bot-reply. Reply that reply with an url to some of the threads discussing leecher problem, a human will read it this time, and reply.
I wrote a letter to my Senator once. I had to resend it 5 times before I got a non generic reply. If Anet does it on the second time around, that is pretty good!
CorstedPirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 07:26 AM // 07:26   #19
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Profession: Mo/Me
Default

I find it unproffesional for a company to ask complaints be posted on fan forums. Many complaints won't get heard this way, and guarantee's only the biggest complainers get heard.

There are many fansites, and in fact, you must go out of your way to sign up for one, post with enough evidence or reasoning to avoid flames, and particularly argue your point with the community until you are tired and have absolutely no idea if your suggestion or complaint is heard.

Sadly, it is unsatisfying for customers, and only convenient for the developers who may choose to browse forums at their own liesure. Not that they don't look and act upon certain issues, it is just that it takes little reasoning to believe they will act upon what issues keep rising up amongst a plethora of forums such as these in guildwarsguru.com. So the simple complaints that may or may not be warranted may not even get any recognition (bot or no bot :P).

As for the problem at hand, it seems that they do not have any idea's on how to solve the problem as it seems like a game mechanic flaw. They wanted random missions pvp style.
guppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23, 2006, 01:48 PM // 13:48   #20
Banned
 
shardfenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Guild: Il Power Overwhelming Il [HaX]
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix Avenger
Wouldnt it be easy to just kick people out of the group who have not moved/used a skill for 5 mins? (or some other amount of time)
No.
every 5 minutes (or some other amount of time), come back and move your character.
Or...bots.

I read it as:
1: A human made up a short reply to this to make it feel personal, then added the stuff they usually do about the forums.
2: We don't care about the problem, because it does not break the game.
3: We have no way of solving it. Provide an explanation on one of our many fansites (a compiled list can be found at www .goaway.com)
shardfenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Response from NCSoft with regards to CE. nitra Questions & Answers 19 Apr 29, 2006 07:09 PM // 19:09
Ira Blinks The Riverside Inn 101 Apr 20, 2006 05:27 AM // 05:27
To: Anet Re: Leechers. cc.pyro Sardelac Sanitarium 46 May 31, 2005 05:12 PM // 17:12
Anets response to the celestial sig problem Playful Kitty The Riverside Inn 207 May 29, 2005 10:05 AM // 10:05
Forefall Questions & Answers 2 Apr 18, 2005 10:26 PM // 22:26


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:10 PM // 16:10.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("