Curse

Age · Dec 12, 2008, 10:33 PM // 22:33

In a nut shell yes they are.

xDusT II · Dec 12, 2008, 10:36 PM // 22:36

Yes they are. If anyone in this thread has said otherwise they are wrong.

Rhamia Darigaz · Dec 12, 2008, 10:47 PM // 22:47

the margin by which wars are better than dervs and sins is directly proportional to the skill of your opponents; dervs and sins don't kill teams with good monks and coordinated midline shutdown. this is why you see wars everywhere in organized pvp and scythe/ms-db sins in pve. erf shakur is the exception because mobs on their asses can't do 250 dmg/attack to you.

Issac · Dec 12, 2008, 10:55 PM // 22:55

I say they are, I'd take warrior over derv any day. But that's just me.

Xx_Sorin_xX · Dec 12, 2008, 11:42 PM // 23:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by maraxusofk

in pve, go use paragon to tank. p/w doylak sig, adred skills and watch yourself.

don't actually do this.

yes warriors are still viable. My main is a warrior and i don't have trouble H/Hing. I don't PUG so i don't know about that. As others have said though, Necromancers dominate PvE above all classes these days.

Don't know much about PvP..don't typically play it.

DarklingKiller · Dec 13, 2008, 01:17 AM // 01:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Azazel The Assassin

Nope. Paragons and Dervishes outclass them pretty much.

If you want a tank with good damage - go Dervish. Scythe and enchantments for self survival and PBAoE damage.

If you want a tank that can support himself and his teammates, go P/W and slap on a sword or axe. Spec into Leadership, Tactics/Command/Motivation, and Sword/Axe Mastery.

Of course, I hate warriors because 90% of those I meet are idiotic Wammos with FoW armor and Chaos Gloves that overagro EVERY time.

That's cause most are retards and dont use a bow to aggro. Works a hella lot better than running in like a moron.